Randomized Trial of ACT and a Care Management App in Primary Care-based Buprenorphine Treatment
Randomized Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and a Care Management App in Primary Care-based Buprenorphine Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
127
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed IMPOWR Research Center at Montefiore-Einstein (IMPOWR-ME) will create a multidisciplinary and synergistic program of research to test multimodal treatments that address both chronic pain and opioid use disorder. IMPOWR-ME will generate critical knowledge about the effectiveness, implementation, and cost effectiveness of providing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and/or a care management smartphone app for individuals in primary care-based buprenorphine treatment. Patients with lived experience with chronic pain and/or opioid use disorder, patient and policy advocates, payors, and health system partners will be engaged in all stages of the research. IMPOWR-ME is well-positioned to become a long-lasting hub for stakeholder-engaged research with multidisciplinary senior and early stage investigators focused on reducing overdose through better treatments for OUD and CP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2027
May 18, 2026
May 1, 2026
4.2 years
August 24, 2021
May 14, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Pain Interference
Change in Pain Interference on average over the prior 7-day period will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. The BPI pain interference subscale consists of 7 items which asks patients to rate how much pain has interfered with mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, sleep, enjoyment of life, and general activity using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents "Does not interfere" and 10 represents "Completely interferes" such that higher scores are associate with greater pain interference. Scores from the seven items are averaged to obtain a mean score. Higher scores are indicative of more interference with daily life. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 36 weeks
Illicit Opioid Use
Illicit opioid use will be a composite outcome defined by self-reported opioid use days over the past 30 days using items from a modified Addiction Severity Index questionnaire. It is defined by the maximum number of days of use of: a) heroin, b) fentanyl \[unprescribed\], and c) prescription opioids or analgesics \[unprescribed\]. The possible range of days is 0-30. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 36 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Psychological Flexibility
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Psychological Inflexibility
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Psychological Flexibility Related to Substance Use
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Committed Action
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Pain Acceptance
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Valera smartphone application (app) alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this cohort will receive the Valera app and will receive a smartphone with network connectivity if necessary.
ACT + Valera app
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this cohort will receive both acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and the Valera app (and a smartphone with network connectivity if necessary).
treatment as usual (TAU)
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this cohort will not receive any experimental treatments.
Interventions
For those randomized to a cohort with the Valera app, the app (and cellphones if necessary) will be provided. The app is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved. It consists of 2 components: a participant-facing Smartphone Application and a corresponding online Care Manager Dashboard. Smartphones and internet access will be provided as needed for the 12-week study duration.
TAU for Buprenorphine (BUP) treatment typically consists of regularly scheduled visits every 1-2 months with primary care physicians and/or nurse care managers in Montefiore primary care settings. During these 15-min follow up visits, providers typically inquire about opioid and other substance use, opioid craving, symptoms of opioid withdrawal, and risk of relapse. In addition, at each visit, urine toxicology tests are conducted and providers review results of prior urine toxicology tests with patients. If opioid or other substance use is ongoing, typically providers will intensify treatment, including increasing the frequency of visits, referring to social workers or mental health providers, recommending self-help groups, and/or recommending outpatient drug treatment programs (e.g., individual and group counseling).
Intervention will be provided over 12 weeks with weekly 1-hour sessions using a group format with the overall goal to foster psychological flexibility. ACT will assist participants to notice their internal triggers; abandon their attempts to manage these triggers via active avoidance (suppression or other control-based strategies including opioid or other substance use) and to make commitments to engage in behaviors consistent with their chosen values or goals (rather than allowing negative thoughts, feelings, or pain symptoms to dictate behavior).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or older;
- English or Spanish proficiency;
- receiving BUP treatment for OUD for at least 14 days (thus a stabilized BUP dose); and
- CP with at least moderate pain severity (score greater than or equal to 4 on Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) scale). Comorbid psychiatric conditions and use of psychotropic medications will be allowed
You may not qualify if:
- Acute exacerbation of psychiatric conditions precluding the ability to participate in the study (e.g., acute mania, active suicidality/homicidality, psychosis);
- psychotropic medication changes within the past three months prior to enrollment;
- CP related to malignancy;
- received ACT or similar therapeutic intervention in the past;
- initiated psychotherapy within the past three months;
- neurocognitive conditions that may prevent participants from accessing telehealth services;
- current use of a smartphone health platform similar to the Valera app;
- are unable or unwilling to provide signed consent for participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Weill Medical College of Cornell Universitycollaborator
- Wake Forest University Health Sciencescollaborator
- University of Miamicollaborator
- Valera Healthcollaborator
- Tulane Universitycollaborator
- Albert Einstein College of Medicinelead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
Related Publications (55)
Nahvi S, Blackstock O, Sohler NL, Thompson D, Cunningham CO. Smoking cessation treatment among office-based buprenorphine treatment patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Aug;47(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
PMID: 24912863BACKGROUNDCunningham CO, Roose RJ, Starrels JL, Giovanniello A, Sohler NL. Prior buprenorphine experience is associated with office-based buprenorphine treatment outcomes. J Addict Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(4):287-93. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31829727b2.
PMID: 23722632BACKGROUNDFox AD, Sohler NL, Starrels JL, Ning Y, Giovanniello A, Cunningham CO. Pain is not associated with worse office-based buprenorphine treatment outcomes. Subst Abus. 2012;33(4):361-5. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2011.638734.
PMID: 22989279BACKGROUNDWilliams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3.
PMID: 23152245BACKGROUNDDavis MC, Zautra AJ, Wolf LD, Tennen H, Yeung EW. Mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral interventions for chronic pain: differential effects on daily pain reactivity and stress reactivity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Feb;83(1):24-35. doi: 10.1037/a0038200. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
PMID: 25365778BACKGROUNDGarland EL, Manusov EG, Froeliger B, Kelly A, Williams JM, Howard MO. Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement for chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse: results from an early-stage randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Jun;82(3):448-459. doi: 10.1037/a0035798. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
PMID: 24491075BACKGROUNDVowles KE, Witkiewitz K, Cusack KJ, Gilliam WP, Cardon KE, Bowen S, Edwards KA, McEntee ML, Bailey RW. Integrated Behavioral Treatment for Veterans With Co-Morbid Chronic Pain and Hazardous Opioid Use: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Pain. 2020 Jul-Aug;21(7-8):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
PMID: 31760109BACKGROUNDKaiser RS, Mooreville M, Kannan K. Psychological Interventions for the Management of Chronic Pain: a Review of Current Evidence. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015 Sep;19(9):43. doi: 10.1007/s11916-015-0517-9.
PMID: 26209170BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Vowles KE. Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):178-87. doi: 10.1037/a0035623.
PMID: 24547803BACKGROUNDKashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):865-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
PMID: 21151705BACKGROUNDHayes, S., Strosahl, K. & Wilson, K. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy : An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change / S.C. Hayes, K.D. Strosahl, K.G. Wilson. (2011).
BACKGROUNDHayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
PMID: 16300724BACKGROUNDVeehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KM. Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(1):5-31. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 26818413BACKGROUNDKwok SS, Chan EC, Chen PP, Lo BC. The "self" in pain: the role of psychological inflexibility in chronic pain adjustment. J Behav Med. 2016 Oct;39(5):908-15. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9750-x. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
PMID: 27278752BACKGROUNDVowles, K. E. & Thompson, M. in Mindfulness and acceptance in behavioral medicine: Current theory and practice. 31-60 (New Harbinger Publications, Inc., 2011)
BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behav Res Ther. 2005 Oct;43(10):1335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.003. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
PMID: 16086984BACKGROUNDWicksell RK, Melin L, Lekander M, Olsson GL. Evaluating the effectiveness of exposure and acceptance strategies to improve functioning and quality of life in longstanding pediatric pain--a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2009 Feb;141(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.006. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
PMID: 19108951BACKGROUNDDahl, J., Wilson, K. G. & Nilsson, A. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy 35, 785-801 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80020-0
BACKGROUNDWicksell RK, Ahlqvist J, Bring A, Melin L, Olsson GL. Can exposure and acceptance strategies improve functioning and life satisfaction in people with chronic pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD)? A randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther. 2008;37(3):169-82. doi: 10.1080/16506070802078970.
PMID: 18608312BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Velleman SC. Psychological flexibility in adults with chronic pain: a study of acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in primary care. Pain. 2010 Jan;148(1):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.034. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
PMID: 19945795BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, MacKichan F, Eccleston C. Contextual cognitive-behavioral therapy for severely disabled chronic pain sufferers: effectiveness and clinically significant change. Eur J Pain. 2007 Apr;11(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
PMID: 16762571BACKGROUNDVowles KE, McCracken LM. Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: a study of treatment effectiveness and process. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;76(3):397-407. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.3.397.
PMID: 18540733BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM. Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain. 1998 Jan;74(1):21-27. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00146-2.
PMID: 9514556BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Zhao-O'Brien J. General psychological acceptance and chronic pain: there is more to accept than the pain itself. Eur J Pain. 2010 Feb;14(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
PMID: 19349199BACKGROUNDLin J, Klatt LI, McCracken LM, Baumeister H. Psychological flexibility mediates the effect of an online-based acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: an investigation of change processes. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):663-672. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001134.
PMID: 29320375BACKGROUNDWetherell JL, Afari N, Rutledge T, Sorrell JT, Stoddard JA, Petkus AJ, Solomon BC, Lehman DH, Liu L, Lang AJ, Atkinson HJ. A randomized, controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2011 Sep;152(9):2098-2107. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
PMID: 21683527BACKGROUNDLuciano JV, Guallar JA, Aguado J, Lopez-Del-Hoyo Y, Olivan B, Magallon R, Alda M, Serrano-Blanco A, Gili M, Garcia-Campayo J. Effectiveness of group acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia: a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EFFIGACT study). Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.029. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
PMID: 24378880BACKGROUNDLuciano JV, D'Amico F, Feliu-Soler A, McCracken LM, Aguado J, Penarrubia-Maria MT, Knapp M, Serrano-Blanco A, Garcia-Campayo J. Cost-Utility of Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia Versus Recommended Drugs: An Economic Analysis Alongside a 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted in Spain (EFFIGACT Study). J Pain. 2017 Jul;18(7):868-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
PMID: 28342891BACKGROUNDHayes, S. C. et al. A Preliminary trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance-abusing methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Behavior Therapy 35, 667-688 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80014-5
BACKGROUNDLuoma JB, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC, Fletcher L. Slow and steady wins the race: a randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy targeting shame in substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb;80(1):43-53. doi: 10.1037/a0026070. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
PMID: 22040285BACKGROUNDStotts AL, Green C, Masuda A, Grabowski J, Wilson K, Northrup TF, Moeller FG, Schmitz JM. A stage I pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy for methadone detoxification. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Oct 1;125(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PMID: 22425411BACKGROUNDJakubowski A, Lu T, DiRenno F, Jadow B, Giovanniello A, Nahvi S, Cunningham C, Fox A. Same-day vs. delayed buprenorphine prescribing and patient retention in an office-based buprenorphine treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Dec;119:108140. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108140. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
PMID: 33138925BACKGROUNDCunningham CO, Giovanniello A, Kunins HV, Roose RJ, Fox AD, Sohler NL. Buprenorphine treatment outcomes among opioid-dependent cocaine users and non-users. Am J Addict. 2013 Jul-Aug;22(4):352-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.12032.x.
PMID: 23795874BACKGROUNDCunningham C, Giovanniello A, Sacajiu G, Whitley S, Mund P, Beil R, Sohler N. Buprenorphine treatment in an urban community health center: what to expect. Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(7):500-6.
PMID: 18928077BACKGROUNDTan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
PMID: 15042521BACKGROUNDMcLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M. The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9(3):199-213. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(92)90062-s.
PMID: 1334156BACKGROUNDVowles KE, McCracken LM, Sowden G, Ashworth J. Psychological flexibility in coping with chronic pain: further examination of the brief pain coping inventory-2. Clin J Pain. 2014 Apr;30(4):324-30. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829ea187.
PMID: 23887338BACKGROUNDSheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
PMID: 9881538BACKGROUNDDewitt B, Feeny D, Fischhoff B, Cella D, Hays RD, Hess R, Pilkonis PA, Revicki DA, Roberts MS, Tsevat J, Yu L, Hanmer J. Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS(R)-Preference (PROPr) Scoring System. Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):683-698. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18776637. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
PMID: 29944456BACKGROUNDKrebs EE, Lorenz KA, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Wu J, Sutherland JM, Asch SM, Kroenke K. Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1. Epub 2009 May 6.
PMID: 19418100BACKGROUNDNahvi S, Litwin AH, Heo M, Berg KM, Li X, Arnsten JH. Directly observed antiretroviral therapy eliminates adverse effects of active drug use on adherence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jan 1;120(1-3):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.025. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
PMID: 21885212BACKGROUNDNahvi S, Ning Y, Segal KS, Richter KP, Arnsten JH. Varenicline efficacy and safety among methadone maintained smokers: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1554-63. doi: 10.1111/add.12631. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
PMID: 24862167BACKGROUNDBerg KM, Litwin A, Li X, Heo M, Arnsten JH. Directly observed antiretroviral therapy improves adherence and viral load in drug users attending methadone maintenance clinics: a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jan 15;113(2-3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PMID: 20832196BACKGROUNDLin J, Paganini S, Sander L, Luking M, Ebert DD, Buhrman M, Andersson G, Baumeister H. An Internet-Based Intervention for Chronic Pain. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 13;114(41):681-688. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0681.
PMID: 29082858BACKGROUNDSchwartz B, Cohen ZD, Rubel JA, Zimmermann D, Wittmann WW, Lutz W. Personalized treatment selection in routine care: Integrating machine learning and statistical algorithms to recommend cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic therapy. Psychother Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):33-51. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1769219. Epub 2020 May 28.
PMID: 32463342BACKGROUNDKeefe JR, Kim TT, DeRubeis RJ, Streiner DL, Links PS, McMain SF. Treatment selection in borderline personality disorder between dialectical behavior therapy and psychodynamic psychiatric management. Psychol Med. 2021 Aug;51(11):1829-1837. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000550. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
PMID: 32204742BACKGROUNDGarge NR, Bobashev G, Eggleston B. Random forest methodology for model-based recursive partitioning: the mobForest package for R. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 11;14:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-125.
PMID: 23577585BACKGROUNDGenuer, R., Poggi, J.-M. & Tuleau-Malot, C. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recognition Letters 31, 2225-2236 (2010). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014
BACKGROUNDStrobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):323-48. doi: 10.1037/a0016973.
PMID: 19968396BACKGROUNDAustin, P. C. & Tu, J. V. Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models. The American Statistician 58, 131-137 (2004).
BACKGROUNDSanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, Kuntz KM, Meltzer DO, Owens DK, Prosser LA, Salomon JA, Sculpher MJ, Trikalinos TA, Russell LB, Siegel JE, Ganiats TG. Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
PMID: 27623463BACKGROUNDMcCullagh, P. Generalized linear models. (Routledge, 2019).
BACKGROUNDShepard, D. S. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. By M.R. Gold, J.E Siegel, L.B. Russell, and M.C. Weinstein (eds). New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 2, 91-92 (1999). https://doi.org:10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(199906)2:2<91::aid-mhp46>3.0.co;2-i
BACKGROUNDMatthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990 Jan 27;300(6719):230-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230.
PMID: 2106931BACKGROUNDGlick, H. A., Doshi, J. A., Sonnad, S. S. & Polsky, D. Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. (Oxford University Press, 2014).
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hector Perez, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2021
First Posted
September 9, 2021
Study Start
February 2, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 27, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 27, 2027
Last Updated
May 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share