NCT05037799

Brief Summary

Selection of the appropriate administered activity for each patient's body habitus is very important to obtain diagnostic image quality. Current SPECT imaging guidelines suggest "…an effort to tailor the administered activity to the patient's habitus and imaging equipment should be made… \[however\] strong evidence supporting one particular weight-based dosing scheme does not exist." An increase in body weight leads to higher fractions of attenuated and scattered photons, resulting in lower quality PET images for a given injected activity. Weight-based tracer dosing is commonly recommended as a solution in whole-body PET imaging with F-18-FDG. In contrast, Rb-82 PET imaging has traditionally been performed using a single dose (e.g. 40 mCi) administered for all patients but this is known to result in lower count-density and image quality in larger patients. This effect can be mitigated to some degree by administration of Rb-82 activity as a proportion of body weight while maintaining accuracy for the detection of disease. The objective of this project is to determine whether Rb-82 activity administered as a squared function of patient weight (quadratic dosing) can standardize PET myocardial perfusion image quality over a wide range of body weights. Sequential patients referred for dipyridamole stress Rb-82 PET perfusion imaging at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Patients will be divided into 4 weight groups to determine if there are significance differences in image quality or accuracy of injected Rb-82 activity between patients. Twelve (12) patients will be recruited in each of the 4 weight groups (3 in each 10 kg interval) to uniformly sample the full range of patient weights from 30 to 190 kg. Based on the previous oncology PET literature image quality is not expected to change as a function of weight, i.e. SNR and CNR will be proportional to weight0 (no weight-dependence) with quadratic dosing of Rb-82. Two operators will perform the PET image analysis as described above.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 8, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 29, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

September 2, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Rubidium-82 PETMyocardial Perfusion Imagingdiagnostic accuracyweight based dosingimage enhancement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rubidium PET image quality

    Stress gated signal-to-noise ratio measured in the left ventricle myocardium and blood cavity

    During the participant scan

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rubidium activity accuracy

    During the participant scan

  • Rubidium timing accuracy

    During the participant scan

Study Arms (4)

Group 1

body-weight \< 50kg

Drug: Rb-82 Radioisotope

Group 2

50 kg ≤ body-weight \< 100 kg

Drug: Rb-82 Radioisotope

Group 3

100 kg ≤ body-weight \< 150 kg

Drug: Rb-82 Radioisotope

Group 4

150 kg ≤ body-weight \< 200 kg

Drug: Rb-82 Radioisotope

Interventions

Quadratic dosing: Rubidium-82 activity prescribed as a squared function of body-weight instead of linear function of body-weight or fixed activity independent of body-weight

Also known as: PET perfusion imaging
Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Male/female participants, 18 years of age or older, referred for dipyridamole stress Rb-82 PET perfusion imaging at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients referred to the University of Ottawa Heart Institute for clinically indicated dipyridamole stress, Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for diagnosis or risk stratification for myocardial ischemia.
  • at least 18 years of age.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with contraindications to dipyridamole stress PET MPI including: 1) severe reactive airway disease; 2) less than 3 days post-MI/ACS presentation; 3) unstable crescendo angina; 4) high-grade AV block; 5) allergy to dipyridamole or theophyllines; 6) caffeine within 24 hours; 7) theophyllines within 48 hours; 8) severe claustrophobia; and 9) those who may be pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • de Groot EH, Post N, Boellaard R, Wagenaar NR, Willemsen AT, van Dalen JA. Optimized dose regimen for whole-body FDG-PET imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2013 Aug 12;3(1):63. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-63.

    PMID: 23938036BACKGROUND
  • Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, Verzijlbergen FJ, Barrington SF, Pike LC, Weber WA, Stroobants S, Delbeke D, Donohoe KJ, Holbrook S, Graham MM, Testanera G, Hoekstra OS, Zijlstra J, Visser E, Hoekstra CJ, Pruim J, Willemsen A, Arends B, Kotzerke J, Bockisch A, Beyer T, Chiti A, Krause BJ; European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

    PMID: 25452219BACKGROUND
  • Koopman D, van Osch JA, Jager PL, Tenbergen CJ, Knollema S, Slump CH, van Dalen JA. Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines. EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40658-016-0158-z. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

    PMID: 27682837BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Interventions

Rubidium-82

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rob deKemp, PhD

    Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2021

First Posted

September 8, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

November 29, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations