NCT05035784

Brief Summary

Constipation is the most common complaint in childhood gastrointestinal disease, affecting an estimated 20% of the global children.The treatment strategies consist of diet control, behavioral intervention and oral and sometimes rectal laxatives. Given higher success rate and fewer side effects, the laxative PEG3350 has been considered the first choice in childhood constipation.However, effectiveness of PEG 3350 laxative is not lasting, and the use of PEG increases the risk of fecal incontinence. Additional treatment interventions are still necessary.Enema can act directly on the rectum and distal colon to quickly relieve symptoms of fecal impaction which is considered one of main source of intractable constipation. Children with fecal impaction who received enema had fewer fecal incontinence and diarrhea than children who received PEG. There have been lots of evidence that enema is effective in fecal impaction in children with functional constipation.But there are still cases of recurrences noted after enema. Fecal bacteria transplantation (FMT) is a new treatment method emerging in recent years, which is widely used in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal diseases. FMT has been proved to play a very prominent role in correcting intestinal flora disorders. By transplanting exogenous flora into the intestinal tract of patients, FMT can inhibit bacterial reproduction, regulate intestinal environment and cascade the body immunity, so as to achieve the therapeutic effect of disease. Retrograde colonic enema with FMT, an new method, provides the possibility for the treatment of childhood constipation. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based support for the treatment of childhood constipation by retrograde colonic enema with FMT. Therefore, we designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of retrograde colonic enema with FMT in the treatment of childhood constipation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 10, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 13, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week

    the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods

    Baseline

  • improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week

    the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods

    at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment

  • improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week

    the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods

    at the end of 12 weeks follow-up

  • Satisfaction with bowel function

    Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).

    Baseline

  • Satisfaction with bowel function

    Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).

    at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment

  • Satisfaction with bowel function

    Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).

    at the end of 12 weeks follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Bowel movements

    Baseline

  • Bowel movements

    at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment

  • Bowel movements

    at the end of 12 weeks follow-up

  • Painful or hard bowel movements

    Baseline

  • Painful or hard bowel movements

    at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fecal supernatant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fecal supernatant is used for treatment of childhood Constipation

Drug: Fecal supernatant

non-Fecal supernatant

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo is used for treatment of childhood Constipation

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Fecal supernatant from a child registered in the specimen bank that matches the subject's age, gender, and weight .

Fecal supernatant

a placebo designed to match the FMT+RCE group based on appearance including 0.9% physiological saline.

non-Fecal supernatant

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • years old;
  • Roman IV criteria for childhood constipation;
  • After a course of PEG and a course of Chinese medicine treatment was ineffective;
  • Barium enema showing fecal impaction.

You may not qualify if:

  • Congenital and/or acquired intestinal diseases, such as congenital megacolon, intestinal stenosis, polyps, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, inflammation, and tumors;
  • Anorectal diseases, such as anal atresia, fistula, abscess, and tumor;
  • Neurological diseases, such as brain and spinal cord diseases;
  • genetic metabolic diseases;
  • psychosocial and behavioral diseases;
  • other systemic diseases;
  • Refused to participate in.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shengjing Hospital

Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Wang S, Xu M, Wang W, Cao X, Piao M, Khan S, Yan F, Cao H, Wang B. Systematic Review: Adverse Events of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0161174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161174. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27529553BACKGROUND
  • Gurram B, Sue PK. Fecal microbiota transplantation in children: current concepts. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019 Oct;31(5):623-629. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000787.

    PMID: 31169545BACKGROUND
  • Xu D, Chen VL, Steiner CA, Berinstein JA, Eswaran S, Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Owyang C. Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1043-1050. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000198.

    PMID: 30908299BACKGROUND
  • Tian H, Ding C, Gong J, Ge X, McFarland LV, Gu L, Wei Y, Chen Q, Zhu W, Li J, Li N. Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Pilot Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov/Dec;50(10):865-870. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000472.

    PMID: 26751143BACKGROUND
  • Ohkusa T, Koido S, Nishikawa Y, Sato N. Gut Microbiota and Chronic Constipation: A Review and Update. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 12;6:19. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00019. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 30809523BACKGROUND
  • Kassam Z, Dubois N, Ramakrishna B, Ling K, Qazi T, Smith M, Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, Budree S, Panchal P, Kelly CP, Osman M. Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2070-2072. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1913670. Epub 2019 Oct 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31665572BACKGROUND
  • Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;53(10):994-1002. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir632.

    PMID: 22002980BACKGROUND
  • Vriesman MH, Koppen IJN, Camilleri M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. Management of functional constipation in children and adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;17(1):21-39. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0222-y. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

    PMID: 31690829BACKGROUND
  • Clemente MG, Mandato C, Poeta M, Vajro P. Pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Recent solutions, unresolved issues, and future research directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 28;22(36):8078-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8078.

    PMID: 27688650BACKGROUND
  • Woodworth MH, Carpentieri C, Sitchenko KL, Kraft CS. Challenges in fecal donor selection and screening for fecal microbiota transplantation: A review. Gut Microbes. 2017 May 4;8(3):225-237. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1286006. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

    PMID: 28129018BACKGROUND
  • Vindigni SM, Surawicz CM. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;46(1):171-185. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2016.09.012.

    PMID: 28164849BACKGROUND
  • Shen ZH, Zhu CX, Quan YS, Yang ZY, Wu S, Luo WW, Tan B, Wang XY. Relationship between intestinal microbiota and ulcerative colitis: Mechanisms and clinical application of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):5-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.5.

    PMID: 29358877BACKGROUND
  • Dai M, Liu Y, Chen W, Buch H, Shan Y, Chang L, Bai Y, Shen C, Zhang X, Huo Y, Huang D, Yang Z, Hu Z, He X, Pan J, Hu L, Pan X, Wu X, Deng B, Li Z, Cui B, Zhang F. Rescue fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic-associated diarrhea in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2019 Oct 21;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2604-5.

    PMID: 31639033BACKGROUND
  • Gu X, Yang Z, Kou Y, Yang F, Wang Y, Chen Y, Wang E, Jiang X, Bai Y, Zhang Z, Zhang S. Effects of Retrograde Colonic Enema-Based Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2288-2297. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002958. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2021

First Posted

September 5, 2021

Study Start

November 10, 2020

Primary Completion

January 20, 2022

Study Completion

May 13, 2022

Last Updated

November 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations