RCE With FMT in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation
Retrograde Colonic Enema With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation vs Retrograde Colonic Enema Only in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Constipation is the most common complaint in childhood gastrointestinal disease, affecting an estimated 20% of the global children.The treatment strategies consist of diet control, behavioral intervention and oral and sometimes rectal laxatives. Given higher success rate and fewer side effects, the laxative PEG3350 has been considered the first choice in childhood constipation.However, effectiveness of PEG 3350 laxative is not lasting, and the use of PEG increases the risk of fecal incontinence. Additional treatment interventions are still necessary.Enema can act directly on the rectum and distal colon to quickly relieve symptoms of fecal impaction which is considered one of main source of intractable constipation. Children with fecal impaction who received enema had fewer fecal incontinence and diarrhea than children who received PEG. There have been lots of evidence that enema is effective in fecal impaction in children with functional constipation.But there are still cases of recurrences noted after enema. Fecal bacteria transplantation (FMT) is a new treatment method emerging in recent years, which is widely used in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal diseases. FMT has been proved to play a very prominent role in correcting intestinal flora disorders. By transplanting exogenous flora into the intestinal tract of patients, FMT can inhibit bacterial reproduction, regulate intestinal environment and cascade the body immunity, so as to achieve the therapeutic effect of disease. Retrograde colonic enema with FMT, an new method, provides the possibility for the treatment of childhood constipation. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based support for the treatment of childhood constipation by retrograde colonic enema with FMT. Therefore, we designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of retrograde colonic enema with FMT in the treatment of childhood constipation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 13, 2022
CompletedNovember 22, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.2 years
August 26, 2021
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week
the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
Baseline
improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week
the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment
improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per week
the frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Satisfaction with bowel function
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
Baseline
Satisfaction with bowel function
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment
Satisfaction with bowel function
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Bowel movements
Baseline
Bowel movements
at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment
Bowel movements
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Painful or hard bowel movements
Baseline
Painful or hard bowel movements
at the end of 4-weeks FMT treatment
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fecal supernatant
ACTIVE COMPARATORFecal supernatant is used for treatment of childhood Constipation
non-Fecal supernatant
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo is used for treatment of childhood Constipation
Interventions
Fecal supernatant from a child registered in the specimen bank that matches the subject's age, gender, and weight .
a placebo designed to match the FMT+RCE group based on appearance including 0.9% physiological saline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old;
- Roman IV criteria for childhood constipation;
- After a course of PEG and a course of Chinese medicine treatment was ineffective;
- Barium enema showing fecal impaction.
You may not qualify if:
- Congenital and/or acquired intestinal diseases, such as congenital megacolon, intestinal stenosis, polyps, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, inflammation, and tumors;
- Anorectal diseases, such as anal atresia, fistula, abscess, and tumor;
- Neurological diseases, such as brain and spinal cord diseases;
- genetic metabolic diseases;
- psychosocial and behavioral diseases;
- other systemic diseases;
- Refused to participate in.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shengjing Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
Related Publications (14)
Wang S, Xu M, Wang W, Cao X, Piao M, Khan S, Yan F, Cao H, Wang B. Systematic Review: Adverse Events of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0161174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161174. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27529553BACKGROUNDGurram B, Sue PK. Fecal microbiota transplantation in children: current concepts. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019 Oct;31(5):623-629. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000787.
PMID: 31169545BACKGROUNDXu D, Chen VL, Steiner CA, Berinstein JA, Eswaran S, Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Owyang C. Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1043-1050. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000198.
PMID: 30908299BACKGROUNDTian H, Ding C, Gong J, Ge X, McFarland LV, Gu L, Wei Y, Chen Q, Zhu W, Li J, Li N. Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Pilot Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov/Dec;50(10):865-870. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000472.
PMID: 26751143BACKGROUNDOhkusa T, Koido S, Nishikawa Y, Sato N. Gut Microbiota and Chronic Constipation: A Review and Update. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 12;6:19. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00019. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30809523BACKGROUNDKassam Z, Dubois N, Ramakrishna B, Ling K, Qazi T, Smith M, Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, Budree S, Panchal P, Kelly CP, Osman M. Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2070-2072. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1913670. Epub 2019 Oct 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 31665572BACKGROUNDGough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;53(10):994-1002. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir632.
PMID: 22002980BACKGROUNDVriesman MH, Koppen IJN, Camilleri M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. Management of functional constipation in children and adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;17(1):21-39. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0222-y. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
PMID: 31690829BACKGROUNDClemente MG, Mandato C, Poeta M, Vajro P. Pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Recent solutions, unresolved issues, and future research directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 28;22(36):8078-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8078.
PMID: 27688650BACKGROUNDWoodworth MH, Carpentieri C, Sitchenko KL, Kraft CS. Challenges in fecal donor selection and screening for fecal microbiota transplantation: A review. Gut Microbes. 2017 May 4;8(3):225-237. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1286006. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
PMID: 28129018BACKGROUNDVindigni SM, Surawicz CM. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;46(1):171-185. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2016.09.012.
PMID: 28164849BACKGROUNDShen ZH, Zhu CX, Quan YS, Yang ZY, Wu S, Luo WW, Tan B, Wang XY. Relationship between intestinal microbiota and ulcerative colitis: Mechanisms and clinical application of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):5-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.5.
PMID: 29358877BACKGROUNDDai M, Liu Y, Chen W, Buch H, Shan Y, Chang L, Bai Y, Shen C, Zhang X, Huo Y, Huang D, Yang Z, Hu Z, He X, Pan J, Hu L, Pan X, Wu X, Deng B, Li Z, Cui B, Zhang F. Rescue fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic-associated diarrhea in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2019 Oct 21;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2604-5.
PMID: 31639033BACKGROUNDGu X, Yang Z, Kou Y, Yang F, Wang Y, Chen Y, Wang E, Jiang X, Bai Y, Zhang Z, Zhang S. Effects of Retrograde Colonic Enema-Based Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2288-2297. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002958. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
PMID: 38989869DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2021
First Posted
September 5, 2021
Study Start
November 10, 2020
Primary Completion
January 20, 2022
Study Completion
May 13, 2022
Last Updated
November 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11