COmputerized CTG Self-MOnitoring Versus Standard Doppler Assessment in Late-onset FGR: COSMOS Study
COSMOS
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fetal growth restriction is one of the major causes of perinatal morbidity, mortality and adverse neurological outcome. Growth restricted fetuses do not reach their potential due to multiple factors. Although early (\<32 weeks' gestation) FGR is associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes, late FGR (≤ 32 weeks' gestation) is more common in daily maternal-fetal medicine care. Despite its' prevalence, optimal standard for monitoring differs between the centers and may be difficult in case of limited access to advanced perinatal care. We present a protocol for COmputerized CTG Self-MOnitoring versus Standard Doppler assessment in Late-onset FGR (COSMOS) trial, which is a prospective, cross-over, open-label and randomized trial that compares two different protocols for late-onset FGR observation. All women carrying fetuses with late-onset FGR with positive end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery will be invited to participate in the randomized trial. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: CTG - a group that will receive electronic device for cCTG home assessment, and Doppler - a group that will be monitored according to standard Doppler velocimetry criteria. Further management will depend on the arm of the study. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be collected and analyzed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 15, 2022
December 1, 2022
1.8 years
August 13, 2021
December 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Condition at birth
Incidence of Apgar score at 5 min \<7 or arterial pH of \<7.0 or venous \<7.1 or resuscitation (compressions, medications, intubation)
5 minutes after delivery
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
Incidence any admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Brain injury
Incidence of Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade II or above-defined as bleeding into the ventricles; or hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy or periventricular leukomalacia or seizures recorded by EEG
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Ventilation
defined as need of positive pressure (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP or nasal CPAP) or intubation rate
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Respiratory distress syndrome
defined as need of surfactant and ventilation as a result of prematurity
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Cardiovascular support/treatment
Incidence of anaemia-defined as low haemoglobin and/or haematocrit requiring blood transfusion or DIC - disseminated coagulopathy or ductus arteriosus treatment or hypotensive treatment
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Neonatal sepsis
Incidence of confirmed bacteraemia in cultures or necrotizing enterocolitis \- Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Retinopathy
incidence of retinopathy requiring laser or anti-VEGF administration
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 6 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Fetal/neonatal death
Rate of death in utero or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 4 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
anytime after the recruitment visit or after delivery before discharge from the hospital or up to 4 weeks after delivery if discharged earlier
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Maternal anxiety levels
at the recruitment visit and every 2 weeks until delivery
Compliance
after the recruitment visit until delivery
Number of hospital visits
after the recruitment visit until delivery
Mode of delivery
through study completion, an average of 5 weeks after the recruitment visit
Onset of labour
through study completion, an average of 5 weeks after the recruitment visit
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
cCTG
EXPERIMENTALcCTG group, that will undergo a following process: EFW and Doppler assessment biweekly, and instead of additional weekly Doppler-only assessment, the patients will be provided with an electronic cCTG device at no cost (Carebits). Women will be asked to apply Carebits device at least twice weekly for at least 30 minutes (e.g. Mondays-Thursdays) with minimum 72 hours interval in case of 2 sessions per week. The trace will be examined by an independent centre, available 24 hours daily. The person examining the trace is trained or already specialized in Obs\&Gynae. In case of situation requiring medical intervention, the patient will be immediately contacted by phone and advised to self-refer to the nearest Antenatal Unit. In case of normal trace, a full report will follow within 30 minutes after last reading of the trace.
Doppler
ACTIVE COMPARATORDoppler group, that will undergo a standard process of antenatal care in case of FGR. The EFW and CTG STV will be assessed biweekly. In case of positive end-diastolic flow in UA, Doppler assessment (MCA PI, UA PI, DV PI, Ut PI) will be provided on a weekly basis. In case of deterioration to AEDF/REDF, further management will depend on clinical situation and the patient will be excluded from the study group (applies to both arms).
Interventions
Self-applied home computerized CTG device used twice weekly instead of standard Doppler assessment once weekly.
Standard Doppler assessment provided once weekly in case of late FGR with positive end diastolic flow in the umbilical artery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women aged 18 years or older,
- singleton pregnancy,
- ≥32+0 and ≤36+6 weeks' of gestation,
- fluent in Polish or English,
- diagnosed with late-onset FGR based of the Delphi criteria,
- with positive EDF in UA,
- with macroscopically normal fetus on ultrasound assessment.
You may not qualify if:
- multiple pregnancy,
- fetal malformations,
- abnormal genetic testing results (if available),
- uncertain pregnancy dating,
- indication for immediate delivery within 48 hours after enrollment,
- preterm prelabour rupture of membranes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Polandlead
- Bielanski Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Mother and Child
Warsaw, 01-211, Poland
Related Publications (10)
Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):298-312. doi: 10.1002/uog.22134. No abstract available.
PMID: 32738107RESULTNohuz E, Riviere O, Coste K, Vendittelli F. Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):621-628. doi: 10.1002/uog.20282. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
PMID: 30950117RESULTCiobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
PMID: 30883981RESULTFigueras F, Gratacos E. Stage-based approach to the management of fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):655-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4412. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
PMID: 24839087RESULTGordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, Silver RM, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884.
PMID: 26909664RESULTMolina LCG, Odibo L, Zientara S, Obican SG, Rodriguez A, Stout M, Odibo AO. Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;56(1):61-66. doi: 10.1002/uog.20854. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 31520557RESULTBaschat AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
PMID: 29606482RESULTAkolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):65.e1-65.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
PMID: 30878322RESULTAntenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2018 Apr. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553127/
PMID: 31990493RESULTLai J, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Impact of new definitions of preeclampsia at term on identification of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):518.e1-518.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
PMID: 33166504RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Urszula Nowacka, MD
Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2021
First Posted
September 5, 2021
Study Start
December 13, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The deidentified participant data will become available upon publishing the protocol and results of the study. Study protocol will be available immediately following publication.
- Access Criteria
- The data will be provided on request for anyone after methodologically sound proposal (contact details: urszula.nowacka@imid.med.pl).
Data will be available on reasonable request