Adherence in Upper Extremity Home-based Rehabilitation
Promoting Adherence in Upper Extremity Home-based Rehabilitation Through Motivational Interviewing and Ecological Momentary Assessment
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the proposal is to determine the feasibility of implementing Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and Motivational Interviewing (MI) methods to enhance adherence for a 4-week self-initiated arm training protocol. A non-randomized feasibility study using a 4-week UE training protocol will be conducted in 15 individuals within the first 12 months post-stroke living in the community. EMA data will be collected using a mobile app to automate real-time collection of adherence data on a daily basis. MI will be used to produce self-generated training plans (training goals, training schedule), guided by the therapist before the start of training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2022
CompletedNovember 1, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.1 years
August 26, 2021
October 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (25)
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 4 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 6 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 8 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 11 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 22 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 29 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 37 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
Day 39 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 4 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 6 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 8 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 11 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 22 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 29 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 37 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
Day 39 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 4 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 6 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 8 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 11 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 22 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 29 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 37 visit
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
Day 39 visit
Decision making factors effecting the program adherence through semi-structured interviews
Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with all participants to collect qualitative data on participants' experiences related to the shared decision-making process in phase 1, and adherence to arm training in phase 2 of study.
Day 39 visit
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change scores in Fugl-Meyer Assessment from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
Change scores in Motor Activity Log from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
Change scores in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
Change scores in UE accelerometry data calculated using bilateral magnitude ratio from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up.
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
Study Arms (1)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects with motor impairment will work closely with an occupational therapist to identify a goal and select activities that they will work on at home to improve the function of their affected arm.
Interventions
Therapist guided period delivered virtually (WebEx/Zoom). Participants will be patients associated with NYULH and will have access to Zoom. Each session will last 45 min, and will completed 3x/week by research therapists, who are part of the study.
The 4-week UE training is completed in the participants home on their own and communication with study staff is virtual. Participants will receive daily communication through the Expiwell app to answer survey questions related to adherence, and safety/adverse events. Participants will also complete weekly check-ins with their research therapist over Zoom to answer questions about difficulties related to UE training activities, refinement of training goals, and to receive feedback on their training performance. Each weekly check-in will be approximately 45 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (\> 18 years old) diagnosed with stroke at least 6 months ago at the time of screening
- Living in the community
- Have presence of UE motor impairment on the affected side (Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores \< 66)
- Availability of mobile technology (tablet or smartphone) with internet connection to use phone app and Zoom videochat)
- Be medically stable
- Able to provide written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving active occupational or physical therapy for the treatment of the affected UE
- Presence of severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental Status Exam \<24)
- Self-reported moderate to severe pain of the affected UE with use
- Presence of unilateral spatial neglect (Star Cancellation Task scores \< 44)
- Presence of neurological diagnosis other than stroke.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NYU Langone Healthlead
- American Occupational Therapy Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kim GJ, Gahlot A, Magsombol C, Waskiewicz M, Capasso N, Van Lew S, Goverover Y, Dickson VV. Protocol for a remote home-based upper extremity self-training program for community-dwelling individuals after stroke. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Mar 17;33:101112. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101112. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PMID: 37113325DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Grace Kim, MD
NYU Langone Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2021
First Posted
September 2, 2021
Study Start
September 22, 2021
Primary Completion
October 24, 2022
Study Completion
October 24, 2022
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.The investigator who proposed to use the data.
- Access Criteria
- Upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to gjk207@nyu.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).