Study Stopped
No participant
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and PENG Block for Hip Arthroplasty
Comparison of the Effect of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and PENG Block on Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicentric, Randomized, Prospective Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Hip arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures especially in elderly patients due to deformation of joint. Patients may complain severe pain due to the surgical trauma and the prosthesis. Regional anesthesia methods may be performed to reduce opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects. The hip joint consists of the femoral head and the acetabulum. Sensory innervation of the hip joint is provided by the femoral nerve, obturator nerve, articular branches of the sciatic nerve, and superior gluteal nerve. Because of the increasing use of ultrasound (US) in anesthesia practice, US-guided nerve blocks are widely used. One of the most used methods in the management of analgesia after hip surgery is the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB). Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) is a novel fascial block defined by Arango et al. In this block, it is aimed to block the femoral nerve and the accessory obturatory nerve by injecting local anesthetic between the pubic ramus and the psoas tendon. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to compare the efficacy of PENG block and FICB for postoperative analgesia management in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis. Our primary aim is to compare global recovery scores, and our secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale-NRS), and side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting, etc.) related with opioid use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2022
CompletedAugust 12, 2022
August 1, 2022
9 months
August 20, 2021
August 10, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global recovery scoring system (patient satisfaction scale)
This scoring system includes evaluating emotional state (12 questions), physical comfort (12 questions), psychological support (7 questions), physical independence (12 questions), and pain (7 questions).
Change from baseline scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale-NRS)
Postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours
Opioid consumption
Postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group FICB = Fascia iliaca compartment block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFICB will be performed with a suprainguinal approach under US guidance. The probe will be placed sagittally to view the ilium and iliacus muscle. The probe will be moved medially and inferiorly along the inguinal ligament to view the femoral artery. The probe will then be moved superiorly and laterally along the inguinal ligament towards the anterior superior iliac crest to reach the lateral aspect of the femoral nerve. The deep circumflex artery will be visualized 1-2 cm cephalad to the inguinal ligament and superficial to the iliac fascia. The needle will be inserted with in-plane method 2-4 cm caudal to the inguinal ligament to reach below the fascia ilica. After the block site is confirmed with 5 ml of saline, 30 ml of local anesthetic solution containing 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.
Group PENG
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe probe will be placed on the anterior inferior iliac crest in the transverse plane. Then, the pubic ramus will be visualized by rotating 45 degrees. The femoral artery, iliopubic process and psoas muscle will be visualized. The needle will be punctured with the in-plane method to reach between the pubic ramus and the psoas tendon. After the block site is confirmed with 5 ml of saline, 30 ml of local anesthetic solution containing 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.
Interventions
Intravenous 0.5 mg/kg tramodol and 400 mg ibuprofen will be administered to all patients 30 minutes before the end of the surgical procedure. In the postoperative period, patients will be administered ibuprofen iv 400 mg 3x1. If the NRS score is ≥ 4, 0.5 mg kg-1 iv meperidine will be administered as a rescue analgesic.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ASA classification I-III, aged 50-80 years, who were scheduled for hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia, will be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- history of bleeding diathesis,
- receiving anticoagulant treatment,
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
- patients who do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Hospital
Muğla, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
O'Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 33456890BACKGROUNDPepe J, Ausman C, Tafti D, Madhani NB. Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block. 2025 Sep 14. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK518973/
PMID: 30085515BACKGROUNDGiron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
PMID: 30063657BACKGROUNDCiftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Altintas HM, Tekin B, Sakul BU, Alici HA. A possible mechanism of motor blockade of high volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A cadaveric study. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Nov;74:110407. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110407. Epub 2021 Jun 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 34175637BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient, and the outcomes assessor who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2021
First Posted
September 1, 2021
Study Start
September 23, 2021
Primary Completion
June 20, 2022
Study Completion
July 20, 2022
Last Updated
August 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigator's will not share IPD