Diaphragm Ultrasound to Evaluate the Antagonistic Effect of Sugammadex
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of muscle relaxants is an indispensable in the general anesthesia but is prone to accidents, which are often related to residual muscle relaxant. Therefore, how to timely and effectively eliminate the residual effect of muscle relaxants after surgery has become an urgent clinical problem. Rocuronium is a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant that is primarily metabolized by the liver. Patients with liver dysfunction can affect the metabolic process of rocuronium, thereby delaying the recovery of muscle relaxation. Sugammadex (SUG) is a novel specific antagonist of aminosteroid muscle relaxants, which can effectively antagonize muscle relaxants at different depths. However, whether liver dysfunction affects the antagonistic effect of SUG against rocuronium has not been reported yet. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that with the increase of patients' liver Child-Pugh grade, the recovery time of rocuronium antagonized by the same dose of SUG after surgery will be prolonged, and the incidence of muscle relaxation residual will be increased in the short term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.4 years
July 18, 2021
August 30, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the recovery rate of muscle relaxation
the incidence of residual muscle relaxation at different time points after the operation and the baseline recovery rate of the diaphragm(immediately after extubation, 10minutes, 30minutes and 2hours) When the patients' consciousness and spontaneous breathing are restored, participants can open their eyes according to the doctor's instructions, shake hands firmly, and at the same time, participants can complete the movement of raising their head continuously for more than 5 seconds to remove the tracheal tube.
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
muscle relaxation onset time
within 3 minutes
intraoperative rocuronium dosage
through anesthesia completion, up to 2 hours
PACU monitoring time
about 2 hours
the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications
within 7 days after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Child-Pugh A
EXPERIMENTAL1. Diaphragm ultrasound scan before induction of anesthesia. 2. Anesthesia method: During anesthesia induction, propofol 2.5mg/kg and sufentanil 5μg/kg will be injected intravenously. When the BIS value drops below 60, the muscle relaxation monitor will be calibrated. After T1 and TOF are stable, rocuronium will be injected intravenously at 0.6 mg/kg. During the maintenance stage of anesthesia, the pneumoperitoneum pressure will be at a low level of 8-10mmHg, propofol TCI will be applied to maintain the plasma concentration of 2.5-5.5 μg/mL, remifentanil TCI will be used to keep the plasma concentration of 0.5-5 ng/mL, and rocuronium will be continuously pumped intravenously with 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/h for deep muscle relaxations, with the the post-tetanic twitch count (PTC) value of 1 to 2. 3. When the TOF value was ≥2%, patients in each group will be given SUG (2mg/kg). 4. Diaphragm ultrasound scan at the immediate time,10min, 30min and 2h after extubation.
Child-Pugh B
EXPERIMENTAL1. Diaphragm ultrasound scan before induction of anesthesia. 2. Anesthesia method: During anesthesia induction, propofol 2.5mg/kg and sufentanil 5μg/kg will be injected intravenously. When the BIS value drops below 60, the muscle relaxation monitor will be calibrated. After T1 and TOF are stable, rocuronium will be injected intravenously at 0.6 mg/kg. During the maintenance stage of anesthesia, the pneumoperitoneum pressure will be at a low level of 8-10mmHg, propofol TCI will be applied to maintain the plasma concentration of 2.5-5.5 μg/mL, remifentanil TCI will be used to keep the plasma concentration of 0.5-5 ng/mL, and rocuronium will be continuously pumped intravenously with 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/h for deep muscle relaxations, with the the post-tetanic twitch count (PTC) value of 1 to 2. 3. When the TOF value was ≥2%, patients in each group will be given SUG (2mg/kg). 4. Diaphragm ultrasound scan at the immediate time,10min, 30min and 2h after extubation.
Child-Pugh C
EXPERIMENTAL1. Diaphragm ultrasound scan before induction of anesthesia. 2. Anesthesia method: During anesthesia induction, propofol 2.5mg/kg and sufentanil 5μg/kg will be injected intravenously. When the BIS value drops below 60, the muscle relaxation monitor will be calibrated. After T1 and TOF are stable, rocuronium will be injected intravenously at 0.6 mg/kg. During the maintenance stage of anesthesia, the pneumoperitoneum pressure will be at a low level of 8-10mmHg, propofol TCI will be applied to maintain the plasma concentration of 2.5-5.5 μg/mL, remifentanil TCI will be used to keep the plasma concentration of 0.5-5 ng/mL, and rocuronium will be continuously pumped intravenously with 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/h for deep muscle relaxations, with the the post-tetanic twitch count (PTC) value of 1 to 2. 3. When the TOF value was ≥2%, patients in each group will be given SUG (2mg/kg). 4. Diaphragm ultrasound scan at the immediate time,10min, 30min and 2h after extubation.
Interventions
This study is a prospective, double-blind, low-intervention, non-randomized controlled clinical trial involving 99 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Ⅰ-Ⅲ, body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, who will undergo laparoscopic radical resection of liver cancer under general anesthesia in the Wuhan Union Hospital. Ultrasonography will be applied to monitor the change rate of diaphragm thickness at different time after extubation to evaluate the recovery rate of muscle relaxant, which indirectly reflects the dose-effect relationship of SUG antagonizing against rocuronium in patients with different liver Child-Pugh grades preoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years old.
- Patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical resection of liver cancer under general anesthesia.
- Patients ASA classification Ⅰ-Ⅲ.
- Body mass index 18.5 kg/m2 \~ 24.9 kg/m2
- Able to give informed consent.
- The surgical position is suitable for BIS monitoring and muscle relaxation monitoring.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with allergic to rocuronium and SUG.
- Patients with central and peripheral nervous system diseases, such as polio, Parkinson's disease, peripheral neuropathy, etc..
- Patients with neuromuscular system diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, atrophic myotonia, etc..
- Patients with diaphragm dysfunction, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, mediastinal pneumatosis.
- Pregnant women or nursing mothers.
- Judging by the researchers, patients with other conditions who are unsuitable for clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China
Related Publications (12)
Whittaker R, Wedell D. Review of neuromuscular blockers. Compendium. 1991 Jun;12(6):408, 410, 412 passim.
PMID: 1718602BACKGROUNDNaguib M, Magboul MM. Adverse effects of neuromuscular blockers and their antagonists. Drug Saf. 1998 Feb;18(2):99-116. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818020-00002.
PMID: 9512917BACKGROUNDArino-Irujo JJ, Calbet-Manueco A, De la Calle-Elguezabal PA, Velasco-Barrio JM, Lopez-Timoneda F, Ortiz-Gomez JR, Fabregat-Lopez J, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Fornet-Ruiz I, Perez-Cajaraville J. [Neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Part 1]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Mar;57(3):153-60. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70190-0. Spanish.
PMID: 20422848BACKGROUNDFuchs-Buder T, Schmartz D. [Residual neuromuscular blockade]. Anaesthesist. 2017 Jun;66(6):465-476. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0325-1. German.
PMID: 28573344BACKGROUNDBrull SJ, Kopman AF. Current Status of Neuromuscular Reversal and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):173-190. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001409.
PMID: 27820709BACKGROUNDMurphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
PMID: 20442260BACKGROUNDAytac I, Postaci A, Aytac B, Sacan O, Alay GH, Celik B, Kahveci K, Dikmen B. Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.06.011. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
PMID: 26768931BACKGROUNDShay D, Wongtangman K, Eikermann M, Schaefer MS. The effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on morbidity after general anesthesia and surgery. Neuropharmacology. 2020 Aug 15;173:108134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108134. Epub 2020 May 19.
PMID: 32416089BACKGROUNDHawkins J, Khanna S, Argalious M. Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade: Uses and Limitations. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(19):2140-2148. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190704101145.
PMID: 31272347BACKGROUNDTao J, Zhang W, Yue H, Zhu G, Wu W, Gong W, Fang H, He G, Hu X, Zhao H, Liu A. Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Shenzhen, China, 2015-2018. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 26;9(1):13948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50173-5.
PMID: 31558731BACKGROUNDSun Y, Sun S, Chen R, Shen J, Chen X, Lin Y, Yao S. Diaphragm ultrasonography as a monitor in assessing antagonistic effect of sugammadex on rocuronium in patients with Child-Pugh grades A and B. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 5;11:1370021. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1370021. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38686365DERIVEDSun S, Sun Y, Chen R, Yao C, Xia H, Chen X, Lin Y, Yao S. Diaphragm ultrasound to evaluate the antagonistic effect of sugammadex on rocuronium after liver surgery in patients with different liver Child-Pugh grades: study protocol for a prospective, double-blind, non-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e052279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052279.
PMID: 35105573DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yun Lin, MD, PhD.
Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2021
First Posted
August 31, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators don not plan to make the IPD collected in this study available to other researchers.