Cerebral Palsy Upper Extremity Orthotic Device
Use of Low Cost Orthotic Device to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Upper extremity therapies for children with cerebral palsy (CP) have been validated for improving function in higher functioning patients. Those who function at the lowest end of the scale, on the Manual Ability Classification System scale (MACS) III-V, comprise 34-54% of the population, but as yet have no evidence-based interventions specific to their needs. Lower functioning children often retain some voluntary control of the elbow in spite of limited finger motion. A dynamic splint, or exoskeleton, could utilize the tenodesis effect from elbow motion to drive finger release while retaining flexor tone for grasp, potentially creating a portable, home-based therapeutic tool. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an upper extremity orthotic device in improving the upper extremity function of children with cerebral palsy who have limited use of their hands.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 26, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.7 years
August 3, 2021
December 21, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Assisting Hand Assessment from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) is a test of hand function in children with difficulties using one of their hands. The AHA measures how effectively the affected hand and arm is used in bimanual performance. An assessment is performed by observing the child's spontaneous handling of toys in a relaxed and playful session. The scale is 0-100, and a higher score indicates better function. A change of +5 is clinically significant.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change in Melbourne Assessment-2 from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
The Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) is a valid and reliable criterion-referenced test for evaluating four elements of upper limb movement quality in children with a neurological impairment aged 2.5 to 15 years: (i) Range of movement, (ii) Accuracy of reach and placement, (iii) Dexterity of grasp, release and manipulation and (iv) Fluency of movement. The full test comprises 14 test items which require a child to reach to, grasp, release and manipulate simple objects. Each child's test performance is video recorded for subsequent scoring. Scoring is completed across the 30 score items using a three, four or five point scale and individually defined scoring criteria. Item scores relating to each element of movement measured are summed within the corresponding sub-scale. A raw score scale change of 3 for range of motion, dexterity, and fluency; and a change of 4 for accuracy is considered clinically significant.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change in Children's Hand Use Experience Questionnaire from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
CHEQ is a newly developed questionnaire. It has been developed for children and adolescents with decreased function in one hand, for example hemiplegic CP, obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) and upper limb reduction deficiency, and for their parents. The scale is 0-100, with the higher score indicating better abilities.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change in range of motion for shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
pre treatment, immediate post treatment, and 3 month followup
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in motion analysis parameters from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
pre treatment, immediate post treatment
Study Arms (2)
Orthotic + Occupational Therapy
EXPERIMENTALOccupational Therapy alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
3D printed orthotic which uses elbow motion to facilitate finger extension
6 weekly sessions of occupational therapy, without use of an assistive orthotic device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of cerebral palsy, age 4-17 years, moderate-severe hand disability as graded by the Manual Ability Classification System, active movement of the elbow, ability to follow commands and participate in goal-making and repetitive tasks
You may not qualify if:
- mild or extremely severe hand disability, Botox or orthopaedic surgery within the past 6 months, severe contractures, lack of voluntary arm motion, unable to follow commands due to severe cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Rutgers NJMS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Children's Specialized Hospital
Union, New Jersey, 07083, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2021
First Posted
August 27, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share