NCT05022121

Brief Summary

Guidelines advocate several complementary modalities as alternatives to drugs and other invasive treatments for chronic low back pain (LBP) conditions. However, there is little high-quality research investigating treatments for back-related leg pain, one of the more severe and disabling presentations of LBP. The investigators are conducting a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a future phase II multi-site randomized clinical trial (RCT). The future trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of a novel supported biopsychosocial self-management (SBSM) intervention versus Medical Care (MC).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 26, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 26, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 20, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

May 18, 2021

Results QC Date

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (16)

  • Number of Particpants Screened Per Month

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the average number of participants screened per month is reported

    6 month period of active study screening

  • Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are Female

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of female participants in the study is reported

    6 month period of active study screening

  • Percentage of Screened Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

    As a measure of recruitment feasibility, the number of participants from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

    6 month period of active study screening

  • Number of Participants Enrolled Per Month

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the average number of participants recruited per month is reported.

    6 month period of active study screening

  • Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are Female

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of female participants enrolled in the study is reported.

    6 month period of active study enrollment

  • Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Are From Racial or Ethnic Minority Populations

    As a measure of enrollment feasibility, the number of participants enrolled from racial or ethnic minority populations is reported.

    6 month period of active enrollment

  • Percentage of Enrollees Not Receiving Any Treatment

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees not receiving any treatment is reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees Receiving Prohibited Treatments

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees receiving prohibited treatments, (contamination), during the 12-week intervention phase of the study is reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees Satisfied With Treatment

    As a measure of intervention acceptability and credibility associated with feasibility, treatment satisfaction was reported by participants via a 7-point Likert satisfaction scale, ranging from 1, "completely satisfied," to 7, "completely dissatisfied," where lower numbers indicate greater satisfaction. The percentage of enrollees satisfied with treatment is reported as a percent value representing those who choose "somewhat satisfied" or better on the scale.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees Attending Required Sessions

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees attending the minimum number of required study sessions (6 for SBSM and 2 for Medical Care) are reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees in Supported Biopsychosocial Self-management Group Reporting Participation in Home Practice

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the supported biopsychosocial self-management arm of the study who self-report participation in home treatment practice is reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees in Medical Care Group Reporting Taking Medications as Prescribed

    As a measure of participant treatment adherence associated with feasibility, the number of enrollees who are part of the medical care arm self-reporting taking medications as prescribed is reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Provider Visits Where All Required Intervention Activities Were Delivered

    As a measure of provider fidelity, the percentage of provider vists where 100% of required intervention activities were delivered is reported.

    Through study treatment, an average of 3 months

  • Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 3 Assessment

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 3 assessment is reported.

    Month 3 assessment

  • Percentage of Enrollees Completing the Month 6 Assessment

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of enrollees completing the month 6 assessment is reported.

    Month 6 assessment

  • Percentage of Weekly Pain Severity and Frequency Assessments Completed

    As a measure of data collection feasibility, the number of weekly pain severity and frequency assessments completed by participants is reported.

    Through completion of all weekly assessments, an average of 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

EXPERIMENTAL

Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

Behavioral: Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

Medical Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Medical Care

Drug: Medical Care

Interventions

Participants receive training and instruction in skills to engage in healthy physical, psychological, and social self-management behaviors. This will be accomplished through 6-12 sessions with a trained chiropractor or physical therapist. Patients will receive training and instruction in exercises targeting posture, strength, stabilization, and mobility based on their individual needs. They will learn psychological strategies including problem solving and cognitive restructuring to address unhelpful thoughts and emotions. Social strategies include pleasant activity planning with a social focus, and communication techniques for navigating relationships to garner support for self-sufficiency. Other elements include providing key evidence based information about BRLP and spinal manipulation therapies (SMT). SMT will include manipulation, mobilization and soft-tissue treatment. Other intervention elements include enablement, persuasion, and resources and materials to support the patient.

Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management (SBSM)

Medical care will be comprised of primarily medication management, which is a standard first-line approach for back-related leg pain in primary care. Choice of medications is informed by the current evidence and the American College of Physicians guidelines on noninvasive treatment for LBP which balances evidence for risks and benefits when making recommendations. Decisions regarding medication selection will be made collaboratively between the study provider and patient after a discussion of risk/benefit profiles and patient preferences, including prior response. Study providers licensed to prescribe FDA-approved medications will call-in the prescription for the medication of choice to the participant's preferred pharmacy, as is typical in clinical practice.

Medical Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Back-related leg pain (BRLP) consistent with the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classifications 2-4 (radiating pain into proximal or distal extremity with or without neurological signs).
  • years of age or older.
  • Back-related leg pain severity of 3 or higher at all screening assessments (0 to 10 scale)
  • Episode duration of 12 weeks or more
  • Ability to read English fluently

You may not qualify if:

  • Spinal stenosis (QTF 7)
  • Specific, non-mechanical causes of BRLP (QTF 11; e.g. infection, tumor)
  • Contraindications to study interventions (e.g. spinal fracture (QTF 5))
  • Inflammatory conditions of the lumbar spine (QTF 11)
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Progressive neurological deficits
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Pregnancy, nursing
  • Ongoing care from another healthcare provider for BRLP
  • Severe unmanaged comorbid conditions (e.g. substance abuse, major depressive disorder, stage 3 hypertension).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainSciaticaChronic PainIntervertebral Disc Displacement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSciatic NeuropathyMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeuralgiaSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, Anatomical

Results Point of Contact

Title
Brent Leininger
Organization
University of Minnesota

Study Officials

  • Linda Hanson, DC, MS

    University of Minnesota

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2021

First Posted

August 26, 2021

Study Start

January 26, 2022

Primary Completion

February 20, 2023

Study Completion

February 20, 2023

Last Updated

March 15, 2024

Results First Posted

March 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations