Simultaneous Traction and Neural Mobilization
Effects of Simultaneous Traction and Neural Mobilization on Pain and Function in Cervical Radiculopathy.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint of the musculoskeletal system which generally has a huge impact on health care expenditure; ascribed to visits to health care providers, disability, and sick leaves. A variety of manual therapy techniques including Cervical traction (CT) and neural mobilization techniques (NMTs) have been prescribed in the management of CR because of their immediate analgesic effect. Both techniques have been proposed to reduce pain and functional limitations in CR. Traction increases the separation of the vertebral bodies which eventually reduces the central pressure in the disk space and encourages the disk nucleus to get back to a central position. The current literature lends assistance to the utilization of the traction in addition to other physical therapy procedures for pain reduction, with less significant impact on function and disability. Further studies should investigate to explore the most effective traction method and dosage, the subgroups of patients with CR, or the pain stage (acute, subacute, or chronic) most benefited by this intervention and the physical therapy procedures that yield the most effective outcomes when combined with traction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2022
CompletedFebruary 24, 2023
February 1, 2023
1 year
August 23, 2021
February 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS for pain is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. Similar to visual analogue scale (VAS), the NPRS is anchored by describing pain severity extremes. The NPRS can be administered verbally or graphically for self-completion.
week 4
Neck Disability Index (NDI) for function
NDI used to measure cervical pain and functional disability. The NDI was created using a questionnaire with 10 questions based on the Oswestry Index, which evaluates restrictions to ordinary life in relation to lumbar pain. The subjects selected a score of one to six (0 to 5) in 10 items: reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, leisure life, pain intensity, ordinary life, and raising an object. The higher the sum of each item's score, the more severe the functional disability related to cervical abnormality. Zero to four points, five to 14 points, 15 to 24 points, 25 to 34 points, and 35 points or higher signify no disability, weak disability, moderate disability, severe disability, and complete disability, respectively
week 4
Short Form Quality of Life 12: (physical, mental)
The developers of short form (SF) 36 have consequently, suggested that a 12 item sub-set of the items may accurately reproduce the two summary component scores which can be derived from the SF 36 \[the physical component score (PCS) and the mental component score (MCS)\]. The scores were put in the free online orthopedic calculator "ortho tool kit" and two summary scores have been generated: Physical component score and mental component score.
week 4
Study Arms (2)
Simultaneous Cervical Traction & Neural Mobilization
EXPERIMENTALTraction is a maneuver of distracting force to the cervical spine to cervical segments/grants decompression of nerve roots. For traction, 10% of the total body weight would be taken. Previous researches that investigated cervical traction found adequate effectiveness on pain reduction in neck and arm as well as improvement in nerve function parameters, and enhancement in neck mobility. The patient would be placed in a supine lying position with the cervical spine placed at 15º of flexion. The head strap will be fitted under the patient's occiput and chin. A safety switch will be given to the patient and ask him to press it if he would feel any kind of discomfort.
consecutive Cervical Traction & Neural Mobilization
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe same description is for active comparator except for treatment mode to consecutive.
Interventions
Simultaneously Mechanical Cervical traction with Neural Mobilization of the upper limb for 3 times a week, 45 minutes per day for 4 weeks
consecutive Mechanical Cervical traction with Neural Mobilization of the upper limb for 3 times a week, 45 minutes per day for 4 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy for 6 months will be included.
- Participants with Positive Spurling and Upper Limb Neural Tension Tests (ULNTTs) will be included.
- Participants of age 20 to 60 will be included
You may not qualify if:
- The participants with cervical myelopathy and other pathologies will not be included.
- The participants with Vertigo/dizziness will not be included.
- The participants with bilateral symptoms will not be included.
- The participants with other musculoskeletal conditions in the affected limb will not be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Physiotherapy Clinic
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.
PMID: 25659245BACKGROUNDAyub A, Osama M, Ahmad S. Effects of active versus passive upper extremity neural mobilization combined with mechanical traction and joint mobilization in females with cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):725-730. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170887.
PMID: 30664500BACKGROUNDSavva C, Korakakis V, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C. Cervical traction combined with neural mobilization for patients with cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:279-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
PMID: 33992259BACKGROUNDTarazona D, Boody B, Hilibrand AS, Stull J, Bell K, Fang T, Goyal D, Galetta M, Kaye D, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Woods BI, Radcliff KE, Rihn JA, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD. Longer Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Negatively Affects Health-related Quality of Life After Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 15;44(10):685-690. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002924.
PMID: 30395087BACKGROUNDEfstathiou MA, Stefanakis M, Savva C, Giakas G. Effectiveness of neural mobilization in patients with spinal radiculopathy: a critical review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Apr;19(2):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
PMID: 25892373BACKGROUNDRomeo A, Vanti C, Boldrini V, Ruggeri M, Guccione AA, Pillastrini P, Bertozzi L. Cervical Radiculopathy: Effectiveness of Adding Traction to Physical Therapy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Phys Ther. 2018 Apr 1;98(4):231-242. doi: 10.1093/physth/pzy001.
PMID: 29315428BACKGROUNDCaridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J. 2011 Oct;7(3):265-72. doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9218-z. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
PMID: 23024624BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arshad Malik, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2021
First Posted
August 25, 2021
Study Start
August 15, 2021
Primary Completion
August 20, 2022
Study Completion
August 20, 2022
Last Updated
February 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share