Gong's Mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide in Office Workers With Cervical Spine Overload
Comparison of Gong's Mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide on Pain and Range of Motion in Office Workers With Cervical Spine Overload
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neck pain is a frequent and disabling complaint in the general population. One of the most common causes of neck pain is mechanical dysfunction of the cervical spine. Although diverse methods have been proposed for increasing cervical range of motion (ROM), joint mobilization has been confirmed as effective in several studies. Typically, joint mobilization methods for increasing cervical ROM include spinal manipulative therapy, the activator and diversified techniques. There are different mobilization techniques for neck pain, and mulligan's technique is one of them. It has two techniques Sustain Natural Apophyseal Glides (snags) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (nags). Gong's mobilization technique helps to heal physical pain as well as distract the mind from stress. In this study, the effectiveness of gong's mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (snags) will be compared in office workers who have problems with cervical posture and range of motion (ROM) in order to examine the effects of gong's mobilization on cervical pain and cervical ROM. Twenty office workers with problems of cervical posture, pain and ROM is divided into a gong's mobilization group (n=10) and a Snags group (n=10). Gong's mobilization and nags will be administered three times a week for four weeks to each respective group and then changes in cervical posture, pain and cervical ROM will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedApril 22, 2022
April 1, 2022
6 months
August 23, 2021
April 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
universal Goniometer
range of joint
4 weeks
pain of patient
NPRS The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
4 weeks
Function
Item scores range from 0 to 5, and the total score is a total of the item scores (possible range 0 (no pain) - 100 (maximal pain)
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALTen patients will be treated with Gong's mobilization.
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORTen patients will be treated with SNAGs
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both Gender
- Aged 25 to 45 years
- Participants actively working in offices and who had been diagnosed with or self-reported chronic non-specific neck pain.
- NPRS \>4
You may not qualify if:
- Surgical treatment of cervical spine (Cervical Diskectomy)
- Tumor around the neck
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Nervous system disorder(Vestibular disorder)
- Whiplash Injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (4)
Gong W. The effects of cervical joint manipulation, based on passive motion analysis, on cervical lordosis, forward head posture, and cervical ROM in university students with abnormal posture of the cervical spine. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 May;27(5):1609-11. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1609. Epub 2015 May 26.
PMID: 26157273BACKGROUNDBorghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain. 1998 Jul;77(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00058-X.
PMID: 9755013BACKGROUNDJensen C. Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Jun;29(3):197-205. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.722.
PMID: 12828389BACKGROUNDCagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D. Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):679-86. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0269-7. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
PMID: 17160393BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Salman Bashir, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2021
First Posted
August 25, 2021
Study Start
August 5, 2021
Primary Completion
January 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share