Incisive CT Clinica Trial Protocol
A Retrospective, Single-center, Readerblind, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial Was Conducted to Evaluate the Function of Incisive CT Precise Image and Precise Cardiac Function
1 other identifier
observational
112
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the new features of Incisive CT: Precise Image, (PI) and Precise Cardiac (PC) had the expected effectiveness
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 25, 2021
August 1, 2021
1 month
August 10, 2021
August 18, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The quality of PI/PC and iDose4/ cardiac imaging reconstructed images was basically equal or above 3 score
Scoring criteria 5 points The image quality of PI/PC is better than that of iDose4/ cardiac imaging, which can be used for diagnosis, very satisfied 4 points The image quality of PI/PC is better than that of contrast products, and the image of iDose4/ cardiac imaging can be used for diagnosis, satisfactory 3 points The image quality of PI/PC is basically equivalent to that of iDose4/ cardiac imaging. The image quality is defective, which does not affect the diagnosis, but is normal 2. The image quality of PI/PC is not lower than iDose4/ cardiac imaging, but the image quality is poor, which affects the diagnosis and is not satisfactory 1 points The image quality is lower than iDose4/ cardiac imaging after using PI/PC, the image quality is poor, cannot diagnose, unsatisfactory
through study completion, an average of 2months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Imaging reconstruction enhancement condition using PI/PC compared with using iDose4/ cardiac basically equivalence to or above 3 score
through study completion, an average of 2months
Imaging reconstruction diagnostic confidence using PI/PC compared with using iDose4/ cardiac basically equivalence to or above 3 score
through study completion, an average of 2months
Imaging reconstruction clarity using PI/PC compared with using iDose4/ cardiac basically equivalence to or above 3 score
through study completion, an average of 2months
Imaging reconstruction Noise level using PI/PC compared with using iDose4/ cardiac basically equivalence to or above 3 score
through study completion, an average of 2months
Imaging reconstruction Image texture using PI/PC compared with using iDose4/ cardiac basically equivalence to or above 3 score
through study completion, an average of 2months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Test Group
Using PI/PC reconstruct raw data
Control Group
Using Idose4/Cardiac Image reconstruct raw data
Interventions
Retrospectively collects CT Images and reconstruct using PI/PC and Idose4/Cardiac Images to assessment the performance of the two new software functions of Incisive CT. No direct intervention to patients. And ICF is exempted by EC.
Eligibility Criteria
The original data of the images are from the patient base in the age range of 18 to 75 years (18≤ age ≤75 years)
You may qualify if:
- The original data of the images are from the patient base in the age range of 18 to 75 years (18≤ age ≤75 years)
- Original image data are collected in Incisive CT (version 4.5) and traceable;
You may not qualify if:
- \- The investigator deemed it inappropriate to include the original image data for this clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chao Du, Deputy Director
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2021
First Posted
August 25, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share