NCT05017597

Brief Summary

Many individuals who have had cancer experience functional limitations during and after their treatments. The most common side effect from cancer treatment that restricts cancer survivors' completion of daily activities is cancer-related fatigue. Here, we propose to investigate whether an interprofessional approach that targets physiologic, psychologic, and ecological factors will minimize cancer-related fatigue and enhance daily life participation for volunteer cancer survivors living in the community. The interprofessional team will include occupational therapy professor and students from Eastern Kentucky University (EKU), physical therapy and dietitian professors and their students from the University of Dayton, and instructional design instructor from EKU. The approach will include (1) individualized exercise programs-via physical therapy; (2) problem-solving strategies including modifying the environment or activity -via occupational therapy; (3) goal development via physical and occupational therapy; and (4) cancer-related fatigue education via instructional design. We hypothesize that this approach will result in participants experiencing less fatigue, increasing their mobility, improving their quality of life, and being more satisfied with how they perform daily activities.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

FunctionFatigueOccupationExercise

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Fatiue Level: Brief Fatigue Inventory

    This 9-item scale assesses the severity and interference of fatigue on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (greatest fatigue) scale

    Change from Baseline measure at 4 weeks

  • Change in Fatiue Level: Brief Fatigue Inventory

    This 9-item scale assesses the severity and interference of fatigue on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (greatest fatigue) scale

    Change from 4 week measure at 8 weeks

  • Perceived Functional Change: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    a semi-structured interview to understand the routine activities that the participant completes daily, specifically their self-care, leisure, and social activities. The participant rates the importance of each of the activities using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates "no importance" and 10 indicates "very important." Then the participant rates their perception of how well they currently perform each of the important activities and how satisfied they are with their performance using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates that "they are not able to perform" or "they are not satisfied" and 10 indicates that "they are able to perform the activity well" or "they are very satisfied." This is repeated for how satisficed with how they currently perform each important activity.

    Change from Baseline measure at 4 weeks

  • Perceived Functional Change: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    a semi-structured interview to understand the routine activities that the participant completes daily, specifically their self-care, leisure, and social activities. The participant rates the importance of each of the activities using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates "no importance" and 10 indicates "very important." Then the participant rates their perception of how well they currently perform each of the important activities and how satisfied they are with their performance using a 0 to 10 scale. Zero indicates that "they are not able to perform" or "they are not satisfied" and 10 indicates that "they are able to perform the activity well" or "they are very satisfied." This is repeated for how satisficed with how they currently perform each important activity.

    Change from 4 week measure at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • One Item Fatigue Scale

    Change from baseline measure at 8 weeks

  • FACIT-Fatigue

    Change from Baseline measure at 8 weeks

  • 6-minute walk test

    Change from baseline measure at 4 weeks

  • 6-minute walk test

    Change from 4 week measure at 8 weeks

  • 30-second Sit to Stand

    Change from baseline measure at 4 weeks

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Maximum heart rate and target heart rate range

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Fatigue management

EXPERIMENTAL

Prescribed exercises by Physical Therapy Problem-Solving Sessions to resume activities that ther person needs to do, wants to do or is expected to do. Four online educational modules: What is Cancer-Related Fatigue? Nutrition, Sleep Hygiene and Exercise

Other: Rehabilitation

Interventions

Exercises completed, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) will be reviewed during \& after each exercise session. Exercises will be modified by either increasing or decreasing the intensity. Decisions will be made based RPE, physical symptoms \& any identified barriers or supports. Weeks 1, 3, 5, \& 7, Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) education will be assigned. During weeks 2, 4, 6, \& 8, CRF education will be reviewed and a plan for how to apply the information will be developed. Participant will be guided through 6 steps of problem solving to address one occupational performance problem identified by participant within Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Goal \& action plan for the week will be shared with the participant electronically. At the beginning of each session, participant will describe progress on previous week action plan. Based on participant's response, either a new goal will be developed or the current one modified..

Fatigue management

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Completed treatment for a cancer diagnosis within 5 years of enrollment
  • Access to mobile device or computer
  • Basic computer or mobile device skills
  • Experience a significant level of fatigue defined as \>= 4 on 0-10 scale using the One-item Fatigue Scale.

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment
  • Unwilling to participate in an exercise program
  • Have metastatic cancer (Stage 4)
  • Do not have physician consent to participate in the exercise program
  • Unable to follow verbal or written assessment instructions
  • Non-English speaking.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221, United States

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist. 1977. 32: 513-531

    BACKGROUND
  • Champion VL, Wagner LI, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Smith L, Cohee A, Ziner KW, Haase JE, Miller KD, Pradhan K, Unverzagt FW, Cella D, Ansari B, Sledge GW Jr. Comparison of younger and older breast cancer survivors and age-matched controls on specific and overall quality of life domains. Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2237-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28737. Epub 2014 May 28.

    PMID: 24891116BACKGROUND
  • Du S, Hu L, Dong J, Xu G, Jin S, Zhang H, Yin H. Patient education programs for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1308-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 23.

    PMID: 26072422BACKGROUND
  • Gellish RL, Goslin BR, Olson RE, McDonald A, Russi GD, Moudgil VK. Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 May;39(5):822-9. doi: 10.1097/mss.0b013e31803349c6.

    PMID: 17468581BACKGROUND
  • Hegel MT, Lyons KD, Hull JG, Kaufman P, Urquhart L, Li Z, Ahles TA. Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered problem-solving-occupational therapy intervention to reduce participation restrictions in rural breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy. Psychooncology. 2011 Oct;20(10):1092-101. doi: 10.1002/pon.1830. Epub 2010 Sep 5.

    PMID: 20821373BACKGROUND
  • Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG. Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

    PMID: 21798685BACKGROUND
  • Hoybye MT, Dalton SO, Deltour I, Bidstrup PE, Frederiksen K, Johansen C. Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 27;102(9):1348-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605646.

    PMID: 20424614BACKGROUND
  • Lindahl-Jacobsen L, Hansen DG, Waehrens EE, la Cour K, Sondergaard J. Performance of activities of daily living among hospitalized cancer patients. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015 Mar;22(2):137-46. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.985253. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

    PMID: 25580840BACKGROUND
  • Lyons KD, Newman RM, Kaufman PA, Bruce ML, Stearns DM, Lansigan F, Chamberlin M, Bartels SJ, Whipple J, Hegel MT. Goal Attainment and Goal Adjustment of Older Adults During Person-Directed Cancer Rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther. 2018 Mar/Apr;72(2):7202205110p1-7202205110p8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.023648.

    PMID: 29426388BACKGROUND
  • Ma Y, He B, Jiang M, Yang Y, Wang C, Huang C, Han L. Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Nov;111:103707. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103707. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

    PMID: 32920423BACKGROUND
  • Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, Snyder C. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.

    PMID: 22895961BACKGROUND
  • Silver JK, Baima J, Newman R, Galantino ML, Shockney LD. Cancer rehabilitation may improve function in survivors and decrease the economic burden of cancer to individuals and society. Work. 2013;46(4):455-72. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131755.

    PMID: 24125901BACKGROUND
  • Owen JE, Klapow JC, Roth DL, Shuster JL Jr, Bellis J, Meredith R, Tucker DC. Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):54-64. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_7.

    PMID: 16097906BACKGROUND
  • Salzer MS, Palmer SC, Kaplan K, Brusilovskiy E, Ten Have T, Hampshire M, Metz J, Coyne JC. A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2010 Apr;19(4):441-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.1586.

    PMID: 19484712BACKGROUND
  • Smith TM, Broomhall CN, Crecelius AR. Physical and Psychological Effects of a 12-Session Cancer Rehabilitation Exercise Program. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec 1;20(6):653-659. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.653-659.

    PMID: 27857248BACKGROUND
  • Yun YH, Lee KS, Kim YW, Park SY, Lee ES, Noh DY, Kim S, Oh JH, Jung SY, Chung KW, Lee YJ, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Shim YM, Zo JI, Park JW, Kim YA, Shon EJ, Park S. Web-based tailored education program for disease-free cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 20;30(12):1296-303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2979. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

    PMID: 22412149BACKGROUND
  • Zabit F, Iyigun G. A comparison of physical characteristics, functions and quality of life between breast cancer survivor women who had a mastectomy and healthy women. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(6):937-945. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181362.

    PMID: 31282398BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsFatigueMotor Activity

Interventions

Rehabilitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Anne Fleischer, Ph.D

    University of Cincinnati

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Posted

August 24, 2021

Study Start

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Only researchers involved in this study, who have been approved by the Institutional Review Board, will have access to the data.

Locations