The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Print Lung Screening Communication Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
326
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether a picture narrative format is more successful, than text with pictures or text alone, in communicating lung screening information (primarily defined by positive attitudes towards the design and increase in knowledge) to people likely to be invited to lung screening where available.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 8, 2021
CompletedOctober 26, 2021
October 1, 2021
1 month
August 17, 2021
October 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge scores
Participants will be asked 6 multiple choice questions related to the lung screening information presented to the participants during the intervention, covering; Procedure, Eligibility - who, Eligibility - why, Benefits, Adverse effects, Potential results.
Immediately post-intervention
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility self-assessment
Concordance between self-reported personal eligibility for lung cancer screening and actual eligibility based on self-reported age and smoking behaviour.
Immediately post-intervention
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Attitudes
Self-administered four-item lung cancer screening attitudes measure covering cancer fear, fatalism, benefits, and worry, previously used by Smits et al 2018.
Immediately post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Participant Design appraisal ratings
Immediately post-intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
Treatment compliance
Immediately post-intervention
Study Arms (3)
Picture narrative lung screening information
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format which uses text in combination with sequences of pictures to communicate a coherent message. The designs follow conventions from comics/graphic narratives and key stakeholders were involved during the design process.
Text with pictures lung screening information
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format that uses text with non-narrative pictures for decoration. The pictures have been extracted from the picture narratives being used Arm 1.
Text-only lung screening information
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm receive information about lung screening purpose, eligibility, benefits and risks in a format that uses text and no pictures.
Interventions
Lung screening information formatted as picture narratives
Lung screening information formatted as text and non-narrative pictures
Lung screening information formatted as text with no pictures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Living in Glasgow
- Willing and able to respond unaided to invitation to participate in the trial and give informed consent.
- Aged between 49 and 75 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow
Glasgow, G12 0XH, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathryn Robb, PhD
University of Glasgow
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The investigators will be blind to intervention allocation because the intervention and questionnaire is to be undertaken independently and remotely by the participants. Although the intervention is not masked from participants, they will not be informed of the purpose of the study or the different conditions until after they have completed all study measures.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Behavioural Science and Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2021
First Posted
August 23, 2021
Study Start
August 27, 2021
Primary Completion
October 8, 2021
Study Completion
October 8, 2021
Last Updated
October 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- On publication of the study results for a period of ten years.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be made publicly available.
Anonymised individual level study data will be shared via the University of Glasgow's repository Enlighten: Research Data.