NCT05008289

Brief Summary

Gait disorders are symptoms that significantly compromise the quality of life and functionality of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). When they are not responsive to drug dopaminergic therapy and deep brain stimulation (DBS), the management of these symptoms is a challenge in clinical practice. Although deep brain stimulation is useful in the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, gait symptoms remains a challenge in patients undergoing this therapy. This is because, in addition to adjustments in the DBS programming not adding evident benefit in some patients with gait disorders, motor symptoms tend to progress over the years. In this context, spinal cord invasive electrical stimulation was proposed as a potential and effective therapy in a group of patients with PD who presented with gait impairment. More recently, the application of transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord has emerged as a possible therapeutic option, as it could stimulate neural elements in a non-invasive way. The general objective will be to study the effect of transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord on gait in PD patients with deep brain stimulation refractory to dopaminergic therapy. The method of the present study will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, phase II clinical trial that will evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord in patients with PD and deep brain stimulation who present gait disorders refractory to dopaminergic therapy. The primary outcome will be the change in gait speed between pre-stimulation and post-stimulation conditions between the two groups (active and placebo) assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Secondary outcomes will be the effects of stimulation on other gait measures (speed, step length, stride length, cadence, step width, sway time, support time and the presence of blocks), other motor symptoms (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), cognitive alterations, quality of life and side effects. Statistical analysis will be performed using ANOVA for repeated measures and 38 patients will be included. The expected results are supported by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord, which may improve gait disorders in participants with PD and DBS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 27, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2021

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

parkinson diseasemagnetic transcutaneous stimulationspinal cord stimulationgait in parkinson diseasedeep brain stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Timed Up and Go - Test 5 Meters (TUG-Test 5M)

    The primary outcome will be the change in gait speed between pre-stimulation and post-stimulation conditions between the two groups (active and placebo) assessed using the 5-meter total Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Mixel model ANOVA, with TUG as the dependent variable, and time and group as independent variables - "group" would have two levels ("active" and "placebo"). Our alternative hypotesis is that "the time vs. group" interaction effect is significant. Then we should use post hoc statistical tests to explore our data further and to compare the effects of active versus placebo at different time levels.

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Freezing of gait score (FOG SCORE)

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation.

  • Percentage of freezing by video analysis of Timed Up and Go - Test

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation.

  • Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) - Part III

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation.

  • Timed Up and Go - Test 5 Meters (TUG-Test 5M) Dual Task

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation.

  • Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)

    Baseline, immediately after the fifth day of stimulation, seven days after the stimulation, twenty-eight days after stimulation.

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

ACTIVE

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Magnetic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Device: Magnetic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulationDevice: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

PLACEBO

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Interventions

In the active group, non-invasive spinal cord stimulation will be applied by placing a circular magnetic coil (Magventure®️ MagPro®️ R20) on the skin, in the upper thoracic region (thoracic level T2-T3). The intensity of stimulation will represent 100% of the motor threshold, which is determined by abdominal muscle contractions, found from single pulses, gradually applied every 10 seconds until the onset of contractions. The intermittent theta burst stimulation protocol will consist of 20 stimulation trains, with an interval of 8 seconds between trains, each train will have 20 bursts, and each burst will have 3 pulses at 50 Hertz repeated at 5 Hertz. In total 1200 pulses will be applied for 3 minutes and 58 seconds.

Also known as: TMS
ACTIVE

To create a sensation of muscle contraction and impression of active stimulation, both the placebo and active groups will be subjected to the sensory effect of transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation (TENS). The surface electrodes of TENS (model Neurodyn®️, Ibramed®️) will be placed in parallel at the height of the thoracic level T2-T3, with the following parameters: 80Hertz, 150ms, approximately at 60 miliampère. In the placebo group, a coil will be allocated in the thoracic region T2-T3, however this coil will not be connected to the stimulation device, and another active coil will be positioned about 15cm behind, away from its field of view, to provide the idea from the sound stimulus that it is being stimulated.

Also known as: TENS
ACTIVEPLACEBO

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women (non-pregnant) aged between 21 and 80 years;
  • Presence of deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus
  • Participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease at Hoehn Yahr stages between 2 and 4 during off-medication, whose primary symptom includes altered gait and/or balance (score equal to or greater than 1 on sub-item 2.12 of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) \["gait and balance"\]). Patients should present the above symptoms even though they are optimized from a drug point of view and with optimized programming. The criteria to be optimized will be defined by a neurologist specialized in movement disorders who will evaluate the case.
  • Able to give informed consent in accordance with institutional policies;
  • Able to meet all testing and follow-up requirements as defined by the study protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with unstabilized psychiatric comorbidities;
  • Impossibility to consent to their participation in the study;
  • Patients with uncontrolled infection or other uncontrolled pre-existing medical conditions (eg, decompensated diabetes, high blood pressure, symptomatic pneumo or heart disease);
  • Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Patients who cannot walk, not even with unilateral aid of a walking aid device or another person, when they are without their medication for Parkinson's Disease (off-medication);
  • Presence of cardiac pacemaker.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Sao Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2021

First Posted

August 17, 2021

Study Start

November 27, 2020

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

July 1, 2025

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations