Vestibular Socket Therapy With Simultaneous Implant Placement Versus Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement

NCT05005585 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: vst versus contour aug.
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 28
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 3

Brief Summary

immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone.

Conditions

Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Implant survival

  If there is no pain or tenderness on use, no mobility, no history of exudates and radiographic bone loss is less than 2 mm from initial surgery implant the implant is considered successful

  12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Changes in the height and thickness of the labial plate of bone

  12 months

• Changes in soft tissue height

  12 months

Study Arms (2)

vestibuler socket therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

immediate implant placement in esthatic zone with final crown placement after 2 months with VST technique

Procedure: immediate implant

contour augmentation

EXPERIMENTAL

Early implant placement in esthatic zone with contour augmentation and final crown after 3 months of implant placement

Procedure: immediate implant

Interventions

immediate implant PROCEDURE

immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation technique

contour augmentation; vestibuler socket therapy

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone
• Intact adjacent teeth
• Adequate palatal and apical bone that allows achieving implant primary stability.
• Compromised sockets type II defect (Nicolas Elian 2007)
• ≥18 years
• Systemically healthy patients

You may not qualify if:

• Extraction sockets with acute or chronic infection or with adjacent infected teeth
• Heavy Smokers \> than 10 cigarettes daily
• Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy during or within the last 6 months.
• Unmotivated patients to maintain adequate oral hygiene to follow up.
• Patients with physical disabilities that could affect follow up.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Study Sites (3)

Faculty of dentistry Cairo university

Cairo, Giza Governorate, 11865, Egypt

Location

Faculty of dentistry

Cairo, Manial, 12911, Egypt

Location

Iman AbdelWahab Radi

Cairo, 11518, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Immediate Dental Implant Loading

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implantation; Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic; Oral Surgical Procedures; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Prosthesis Implantation; Dentistry; Prosthodontics

Study Officials

• Iman Radi, PHD

  Professor of prosthodontics

  STUDY DIRECTOR

• AbdelSalam ElAsakry, BDS

  Private Practice

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

amir elawady, BDS

CONTACT

00201020205791; amir112093@miuegypt.edu.eg

Mohamed Elkhashab, PHD

CONTACT

00201006611525; mohamed.elkhashab@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: outcome assessor isnt involved in the intervension
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Model Details: VST with immediate implant placement versus contour augmentation with early implant placement in fresh extraction sockets in esthetic zone.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 6, 2021
• First Posted: August 13, 2021
• Study Start: December 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2023
• Study Completion: April 1, 2023
• Last Updated: November 18, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Locations

EG (3)