Evaluate the Clinical Usefulness of [F-18]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Diagnosis Compared to MRI Diagnosis
A Multi Center, Non-randomized, Open, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Clinical Usefulness of [F-18]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Diagnosis Compared to MRI Diagnosis in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups
1 other identifier
interventional
398
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Only in subjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a single dose of \[F-18\]Florastamin at 10 ± 1 mCi is IV administered at Visit 2, and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT images are obtained from the head to thigh after 110 ± 10 minutes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.1 years
August 5, 2021
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity analyzed for patients based on histological findings
For the sensitivity and specificity analyzed for patients of MRI diagnostic imaging and PET/CT diagnostic imaging based on histological findings, present the frequency, percentage and corresponding 95% confidence interval for each group, and conduct the McNemar's test for between-group difference. If the p-value from the McNemar's test is \<0.05 for both sensitivity and specificity, superiority of PET/CT diagnostic imaging to MRI diagnostic imaging is declared.
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Diagnostic sensitivity analyzed for lesions based on histological findings
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
Diagnostic specificity analyzed for lesions based on histological findings
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
Negative predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for patients based on histological findings
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
Positive predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for patients based on histological findings
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
Negative predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for lesions based on histological findings
MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
MRI / [F-18]Florastamin
OTHERMRI and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT are performed for each subject.
Interventions
A single dose of \[F-18\]Florastamin at 10 ± 1 mCi is IV administered at Visit 2, and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT images are obtained from the head to thigh after 110 ± 10 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult men aged at least 20 years determined to be at the high risk of prostate cancer based on screening diagnosis performed at the Urology Department (Patients who require prostate histology due to abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) or abnormal PSA levels, etc., and have a palpable node during DRE or satisfy PSA\>3.0 ng/mL)
- Subjects who were not previously diagnosed with prostate cancer at the time of screening
- Subjects who can conduct prostate histology
- Subjects with the ECOG Performance score of ≤2 at screening
- Subjects who satisfy the following conditions for hematology, kidney function test and liver function test
- ① Platelets \> 50,000/mm3
- ② BUN and serum creatinine \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- ③ AST and ALT \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- ④ PT (INR) or aPTT \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Subjects who were fully informed by the investigator about the objectives, details of the study and characteristics of the study drug, etc. during the screening visit and provide voluntary written consent to take part in this study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who were previously diagnosed with prostate cancer
- Subjects with a history of acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or other urinary infection within 4 weeks of screening
- Subjects who conducted cystoscopy, urethral catheter procedure or colonoscopy within 4 weeks of screening
- Subjects who conducted prostate histology or prostate surgery (other than treatment for prostate hyperplasia or bladder outlet obstruction) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 1 year of screening
- Subjects who received 5-alpha reductase inhibitors within 3 months of screening or currently on them at screening
- Subjects with hypersensitivity to any component of the radiopharmaceutical product
- Subjects determined by the investigator to have difficulty in conducting the study due to serious medical disease
- Subjects determined by the investigator to have difficulty in lying still for 30-60 minutes in a supine position for radiography (CT, MRI, etc.) (example: panic disorder) or have psychiatric disorder causing difficulty in imaging
- Subjects who are planned to administer contraindicated concomitant medication (antiplatelet agents/anticoagulants, thrombolytics or circulatory improvement agents) between 5 days before biopsy and \[Visit 3 + 3D\]
- Subjects who are otherwise determined to be ineligible to take part in this study at the medical discretion of the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- FutureChemlead
Study Sites (5)
National Cancer Center
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (17)
Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, Brawer MK, Flanigan RC, Patel A, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Walsh PC, Scardino PT, Lange PH, Subong EN, Parson RE, Gasior GH, Loveland KG, Southwick PC. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1542-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542.
PMID: 9605898BACKGROUNDPark HK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE. T1c prostate cancer detection rate and pathologic characteristics: comparison between patients with serum prostate-specific antigen range of 3.0 to 4.0 ng/mL and 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL in Korean population. Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.067. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
PMID: 16806412BACKGROUNDJohnson DC, Raman SS, Mirak SA, Kwan L, Bajgiran AM, Hsu W, Maehara CK, Ahuja P, Faiena I, Pooli A, Salmasi A, Sisk A, Felker ER, Lu DSK, Reiter RE. Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
PMID: 30509763BACKGROUNDHofman MS, Murphy DG, Williams SG, Nzenza T, Herschtal A, Lourenco RA, Bailey DL, Budd R, Hicks RJ, Francis RJ, Lawrentschuk N. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol. BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):783-793. doi: 10.1111/bju.14374. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
PMID: 29726071BACKGROUNDChang SS. Overview of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S13-8.
PMID: 16985927BACKGROUNDSzabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, Antonarakis ES, Fan H, Dannals RF, Chen Y, Mease RC, Vranesic M, Bhatnagar A, Sgouros G, Cho SY, Pomper MG. Initial Evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):565-74. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8.
PMID: 25896814BACKGROUNDMaurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Apr;13(4):226-35. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
PMID: 26902337BACKGROUNDRhee H, Thomas P, Shepherd B, Gustafson S, Vela I, Russell PJ, Nelson C, Chung E, Wood G, Malone G, Wood S, Heathcote P. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography May Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.3000. Epub 2016 May 21.
PMID: 27220897BACKGROUNDLee I, Lim I, Byun BH, Kim BI, Choi CW, Woo SK, Lee KC, Kang JH, Kil HS, Park C, Chi DY, Park J, Song K, Lim SM. A microdose clinical trial to evaluate [18F]Florastamin as a positron emission tomography imaging agent in patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04883-y. Epub 2020 May 26.
PMID: 32458006BACKGROUNDOken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.
PMID: 7165009BACKGROUNDAhmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PMID: 28110982BACKGROUNDValerio M, Anele C, Charman SC, van der Meulen J, Freeman A, Jameson C, Singh PB, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Transperineal template prostate-mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Sep;118(3):384-90. doi: 10.1111/bju.13306. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PMID: 26332050BACKGROUNDWeinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
PMID: 26427566BACKGROUNDLeisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00345.x.
PMID: 10877288BACKGROUNDWang W, Davis CS, Soong SJ. Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares. Stat Med. 2006 Jul 15;25(13):2215-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.2332.
PMID: 16220470BACKGROUNDLi J, Fine J. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2537-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1836.
PMID: 15287083BACKGROUNDJia Y, Zhu LY, Xian YX, Sun XQ, Gao JG, Zhang XH, Hou SC, Zhang CC, Liu ZX. Detection rate of prostate cancer following biopsy among the northern Han Chinese population: a single-center retrospective study of 1022 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 29;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1238-9.
PMID: 28851376BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ji Youl Lee, Ph.D
The Catholic University of Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2021
First Posted
August 13, 2021
Study Start
April 28, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share