NCT05004285

Brief Summary

Only in subjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a single dose of \[F-18\]Florastamin at 10 ± 1 mCi is IV administered at Visit 2, and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT images are obtained from the head to thigh after 110 ± 10 minutes.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
398

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 28, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2021

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate Cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity analyzed for patients based on histological findings

    For the sensitivity and specificity analyzed for patients of MRI diagnostic imaging and PET/CT diagnostic imaging based on histological findings, present the frequency, percentage and corresponding 95% confidence interval for each group, and conduct the McNemar's test for between-group difference. If the p-value from the McNemar's test is \<0.05 for both sensitivity and specificity, superiority of PET/CT diagnostic imaging to MRI diagnostic imaging is declared.

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Diagnostic sensitivity analyzed for lesions based on histological findings

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

  • Diagnostic specificity analyzed for lesions based on histological findings

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

  • Negative predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for patients based on histological findings

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

  • Positive predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for patients based on histological findings

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

  • Negative predictive value of diagnosis analyzed for lesions based on histological findings

    MRI and PET/CT conduct at V2(0 day), TPM Biopsy conduct at V3(V2+1~14 day).

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

MRI / [F-18]Florastamin

OTHER

MRI and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT are performed for each subject.

Drug: [F-18]Florastamin

Interventions

A single dose of \[F-18\]Florastamin at 10 ± 1 mCi is IV administered at Visit 2, and \[F-18\]Florastamin PET/CT images are obtained from the head to thigh after 110 ± 10 minutes.

MRI / [F-18]Florastamin

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMale patients aged 20 years or older.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult men aged at least 20 years determined to be at the high risk of prostate cancer based on screening diagnosis performed at the Urology Department (Patients who require prostate histology due to abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) or abnormal PSA levels, etc., and have a palpable node during DRE or satisfy PSA\>3.0 ng/mL)
  • Subjects who were not previously diagnosed with prostate cancer at the time of screening
  • Subjects who can conduct prostate histology
  • Subjects with the ECOG Performance score of ≤2 at screening
  • Subjects who satisfy the following conditions for hematology, kidney function test and liver function test
  • ① Platelets \> 50,000/mm3
  • ② BUN and serum creatinine \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • ③ AST and ALT \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • ④ PT (INR) or aPTT \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Subjects who were fully informed by the investigator about the objectives, details of the study and characteristics of the study drug, etc. during the screening visit and provide voluntary written consent to take part in this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who were previously diagnosed with prostate cancer
  • Subjects with a history of acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or other urinary infection within 4 weeks of screening
  • Subjects who conducted cystoscopy, urethral catheter procedure or colonoscopy within 4 weeks of screening
  • Subjects who conducted prostate histology or prostate surgery (other than treatment for prostate hyperplasia or bladder outlet obstruction) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 1 year of screening
  • Subjects who received 5-alpha reductase inhibitors within 3 months of screening or currently on them at screening
  • Subjects with hypersensitivity to any component of the radiopharmaceutical product
  • Subjects determined by the investigator to have difficulty in conducting the study due to serious medical disease
  • Subjects determined by the investigator to have difficulty in lying still for 30-60 minutes in a supine position for radiography (CT, MRI, etc.) (example: panic disorder) or have psychiatric disorder causing difficulty in imaging
  • Subjects who are planned to administer contraindicated concomitant medication (antiplatelet agents/anticoagulants, thrombolytics or circulatory improvement agents) between 5 days before biopsy and \[Visit 3 + 3D\]
  • Subjects who are otherwise determined to be ineligible to take part in this study at the medical discretion of the investigator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

National Cancer Center

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Korea University Anam Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, South Korea

Location

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, Brawer MK, Flanigan RC, Patel A, Richie JP, deKernion JB, Walsh PC, Scardino PT, Lange PH, Subong EN, Parson RE, Gasior GH, Loveland KG, Southwick PC. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1542-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542.

    PMID: 9605898BACKGROUND
  • Park HK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE. T1c prostate cancer detection rate and pathologic characteristics: comparison between patients with serum prostate-specific antigen range of 3.0 to 4.0 ng/mL and 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL in Korean population. Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.067. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

    PMID: 16806412BACKGROUND
  • Johnson DC, Raman SS, Mirak SA, Kwan L, Bajgiran AM, Hsu W, Maehara CK, Ahuja P, Faiena I, Pooli A, Salmasi A, Sisk A, Felker ER, Lu DSK, Reiter RE. Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.

    PMID: 30509763BACKGROUND
  • Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Williams SG, Nzenza T, Herschtal A, Lourenco RA, Bailey DL, Budd R, Hicks RJ, Francis RJ, Lawrentschuk N. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol. BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):783-793. doi: 10.1111/bju.14374. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

    PMID: 29726071BACKGROUND
  • Chang SS. Overview of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S13-8.

    PMID: 16985927BACKGROUND
  • Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, Antonarakis ES, Fan H, Dannals RF, Chen Y, Mease RC, Vranesic M, Bhatnagar A, Sgouros G, Cho SY, Pomper MG. Initial Evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):565-74. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8.

    PMID: 25896814BACKGROUND
  • Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Apr;13(4):226-35. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

    PMID: 26902337BACKGROUND
  • Rhee H, Thomas P, Shepherd B, Gustafson S, Vela I, Russell PJ, Nelson C, Chung E, Wood G, Malone G, Wood S, Heathcote P. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography May Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.3000. Epub 2016 May 21.

    PMID: 27220897BACKGROUND
  • Lee I, Lim I, Byun BH, Kim BI, Choi CW, Woo SK, Lee KC, Kang JH, Kil HS, Park C, Chi DY, Park J, Song K, Lim SM. A microdose clinical trial to evaluate [18F]Florastamin as a positron emission tomography imaging agent in patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04883-y. Epub 2020 May 26.

    PMID: 32458006BACKGROUND
  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7165009BACKGROUND
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

    PMID: 28110982BACKGROUND
  • Valerio M, Anele C, Charman SC, van der Meulen J, Freeman A, Jameson C, Singh PB, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Transperineal template prostate-mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Sep;118(3):384-90. doi: 10.1111/bju.13306. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

    PMID: 26332050BACKGROUND
  • Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

    PMID: 26427566BACKGROUND
  • Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00345.x.

    PMID: 10877288BACKGROUND
  • Wang W, Davis CS, Soong SJ. Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares. Stat Med. 2006 Jul 15;25(13):2215-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.2332.

    PMID: 16220470BACKGROUND
  • Li J, Fine J. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2537-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1836.

    PMID: 15287083BACKGROUND
  • Jia Y, Zhu LY, Xian YX, Sun XQ, Gao JG, Zhang XH, Hou SC, Zhang CC, Liu ZX. Detection rate of prostate cancer following biopsy among the northern Han Chinese population: a single-center retrospective study of 1022 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 29;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1238-9.

    PMID: 28851376BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ji Youl Lee, Ph.D

    The Catholic University of Korea

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: compare PET/CT Imaging Diagnosis with MRI Diagnosis for one subject
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2021

First Posted

August 13, 2021

Study Start

April 28, 2021

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations