Impact of an Open Lung Extubation Strategy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perioperative respiratory complications are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Postoperative atelectasis plays a central role in their development. Protective "open lung" mechanical ventilation aims to minimize the occurrence of atelectasis during the perioperative period. Randomized controlled studies have been performed comparing various "open lung" ventilation protocols, but these studies report varying and conflicting effects. The interpretation of these studies is complicated by the absence of imagery supporting the pulmonary impact associated with the use of different ventilation strategies. Imaging studies suggest that the gain in pulmonary gas content in "open lung" ventilation regimens disappears within minutes after the extubation. Thus, the potential benefits of open-lung ventilation appear to be lost if, at the time of extubation, no measures are used to keep the lungs well aerated. Recent expert recommendations on good mechanical ventilation practices in the operating room conclude that there is actually no quality study on extubation. Extubation is a very common practice for anesthesiologists as part of their daily clinical practice. It is therefore imperative to generate evidence on good clinical practice during anesthetic emergence in order to potentially identify an effective extubation strategy to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 17, 2022
CompletedMay 31, 2022
May 1, 2022
1 month
July 26, 2021
May 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Protocol adherence rate
During emergence from general anesthesia, a research assistant will observe the adherence to the protocol. The adherence rate will be defined as the number of extubations performed according to the protocol and the patient assigned group divided by the total number of awakenings. In the event of a breach of the protocol, the specific elements that led to the deviation will be noted as well as the reasons given by the treating anesthesiologist to justify it.
At the end of the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of eligible patients per week
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Rate of consent to participate in the protocol
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Rate of missing values
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other Outcomes (3)
Estimated baseline rates of postoperative respiratory complications in the two intervention groups
7 days following the patient enters the recovery room
Comparison of pulmonary aeration using the qLUS score in the two intervention groups
15 minutes after the patient enters the recovery room
Re-intubation rate in the operating room
At the end of the surgery
Study Arms (2)
Emergence from general anesthesia with an open lung extubation strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATOREmergence from general anesthesia with a conventional extubation strategy
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Before starting emergence from anesthesia, the patient will be transferred to their hospital bed or stretcher and seated at 30 degrees. Secretions from the patients' oropharynx will be suctioned. To prevent the patient from coughing, the anesthetic gas or intravenous agent will be stopped after the transfer and suction procedure are completed. The FiO2 will be maintained at the same level or increased to 50% (minimum FiO2) with a fresh gas flow rate greater than or equal to 10 L.min-1. The ventilation mode will be changed to pressure support. The level of pressure support will be modified by the anesthesiologist to generate the same volumes as with controlled ventilation. The PEEP will be maintained at the same level. The minimum respiratory rate will be reduced by 4 min-1. The inspiratory flow for triggering will be 2 L.min-1.
Before starting emergence from anesthesia, the patient will be transferred to his hospital bed or stretcher and kept in the supine position. Secretions from the patients' oropharynx will be suctioned. To prevent the patient from coughing, the anesthetic gas or intravenous agent will be stopped after the transfer and suction procedure are completed. The FiO2 will be increased to 100% with a fresh gas flow rate greater than or equal to 10 L.min-1. The ventilator will be stopped with the APL valve open to atmosphere. The patient will be manually ventilated with the reservoir bag until spontaneous ventilation resumes. Then, the patient may be manually assisted if the treating anesthesiologist deems it necessary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age requiring elective surgery under general anesthesia and hospitalization.
- Patients with a moderate or high risk of postoperative pulmonary complication according to the ARISCAT score (score of 26 or more)
You may not qualify if:
- Expected or known difficult intubation according to the treating anesthesiologist
- Postoperative mechanical ventilation (planned or unplanned)
- Neuromuscular disease
- Intrathoracic surgery
- Respiratory failure, sepsis or mechanical ventilation in the month preceding anesthesia
- Pregnancy
- Patient refusal
- Ultrasound sub-study:
- Body mass index greater than 40 kg.m-2
- Extensive postoperative chest dressings
- Clinician's refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Girard J, Zaouter C, Moore A, Carrier FM, Girard M. Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2023 Oct;70(10):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02533-z. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
PMID: 37498442DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Girard, MD, FRCPC
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2021
First Posted
August 6, 2021
Study Start
November 3, 2021
Primary Completion
December 17, 2021
Study Completion
January 17, 2022
Last Updated
May 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share