NCT04992481

Brief Summary

Objectives: to assess the efficiency of four prophylactic protocols on white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: 1. professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish, 2. PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy 3. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse, 4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy versus a control group not subjected to any prophylactic program. Materials and Methods: Patients (n=150, 111 women and 39 men, age 16-50y,) who began orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances bonded to both dental arches have been provided with detailed initial oral hygiene instruction recommendations. The hygienic recommendations comprised: toothbrushing every surface after every meal (4 minutes) with a fluoridated toothpaste (1450 ppm) using the roll and Bass methods with a soft toothbrush recommended for fixed appliance, interdental toothbrushes, single-tufted brushes and dental floss recommended for fixed appliance. An instruction leaflet has been delivered to every subject, as well. A reinstruction was made during every control visit referring to the results of the oral hygiene assessment. Subsequently, the patients were randomly allocated (using number random generator) into five groups (n=30), including four study groups (I, II, III, IV) and one control group (K). Group I: professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish, group II: PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy, group III: PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse, group IV: PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy, control group (K) not subjected to any prophylactic program. The period of observation was 12 months, with prophylactic visits every four weeks and examinations every 12 weeks. The assessment of white spot lesions was proceeded on the labial surfaces of upper and lower teeth, with patient on the dental chair in proper dental lighting, after cleaning and drying the assessed surfaces.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2013

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2016

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2021

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

white spotorthodontic treatmentcaries prophylaxis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • WSLs presence on teeth

    The assessment of white spot lesions was proceeded on the labial surfaces of upper and lower teeth, with patient on the dental chair in proper dental lighting, after cleaning and drying the assessed surfaces. WSL index according to Gorelick et al. \[28\] was used as follows: 0 - no visible WSL or surface disruption (no demineralization) * visible WSL, covering less than 1/3 of surface, without surface disruption (mild demineralization) * visible WSL, covering more than 1/3 of the surface, with a roughened surface, but not requiring restoration (moderate demineralization) * visible cavitation, requiring restoration (severe demineralization) Every dental surface was subjected to visual-tactile examination performed on a dental chair with proper dental lighting, using dental probe and a mirror. Caries was diagnosed on the level of cavitation, the presence of fillings has been noted as well.

    12 months

Study Arms (5)

1. professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm constituted of randomly selected 30 participants. In this group professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish were performed.

Procedure: PMTCProcedure: fluoride varnish

2. PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm constituted of randomly selected 30 participants. In this group PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy were performed.

Procedure: PMTCProcedure: fluoride varnishProcedure: gaseous ozone therapy

3. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm contituted of randomly selected 30 participants. In this group PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse were applied.

Procedure: PMTCProcedure: fluoride varnishProcedure: domestic octenidin mouth rinse

4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm constituted of randomly selected 30 participants. In this group PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy were performed.

Procedure: PMTCProcedure: fluoride varnishProcedure: gaseous ozone therapyProcedure: domestic octenidin mouth rinse

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group not subjected to any prophylactic program constituted of randomly selected 30 participants.

Interventions

PMTCPROCEDURE

In patients from the study groups I, II, III, IV a professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC) including air-polishing was proceeded on every visit using a glycine-based prophylaxis powder (Air-Flow Soft, EMS, Switzerland).

1. professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish2. PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy3. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy

In patients from groups I, II, III, IV a fluoride varnish of 5% NaF (Profluorid Varnish, Voco, Germany) was applied with a microbrush. Every patient was instructed to stop from drinking and eating for the next two hours (as recommended by the manufacturer).

1. professional mechanical tooth cleaning (PMTC)+fluoride varnish2. PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy3. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy

Patients from groups II and IV were additionally subjected to in-office ozone therapy using OzonyTron-OZ (Mymed, Germany). Ozone was applied on a silicone double-jaw tray of a proper size (allowing even ozone distribution in the oral cavity) following professional mechanical tooth cleaning. A Full Mouth Desinfection program lasting 5 minutes was used.

2. PMTC+fluoride varnish+gaseous ozone therapy4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy

Patients from groups III and IV received a domestic mouthrinse (Octenidol MD, Schülke, Germany) and were recommended to use 15 ml of the liquid for 30 seconds after evening toothbrushing.

3. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse4. PMTC+fluoride varnish+domestic octenidin mouth rinse+ gaseous ozone therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • permanent dentition
  • fixed appliances bonded to both dental arches (no more than 4 weeks prior to the study)

You may not qualify if:

  • inborn tooth anormalities
  • prosthetics restorations

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (22)

  • Øgaard B: White spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: mechanisms and fluoride preventive aspects. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:183-193

    RESULT
  • Scheie AA, Arneberg P, Krogstad O. Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Jun;92(3):211-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00881.x.

  • Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E: Clinical and histological manifestations of dental caries. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E, editors. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. Copenhagen, Denmark: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003, p. 71-99.

    RESULT
  • Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul;94(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90453-2.

  • Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):206-10. doi: 10.2319/051710-262.1.

  • Shungin D, Olsson AI, Persson M. Orthodontic treatment-related white spot lesions: a 14-year prospective quantitative follow-up, including bonding material assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):136.e1-8; discussion 136-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.020.

  • Kozak U, Sekowska A, Chalas R. The Effect of Regime Oral-Hygiene Intervention on the Incidence of New White Spot Lesions in Teenagers Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(24):9460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249460.

  • Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019.

  • Maxfield BJ, Hamdan AM, Tufekci E, Shroff B, Best AM, Lindauer SJ. Development of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: perceptions of patients, parents, orthodontists, and general dentists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):337-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.024.

  • Derks A, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, Katsaros C. Caries preventive measures used in orthodontic practices: an evidence-based decision? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.028.

  • Stecksen-Blicks C, Renfors G, Oscarson ND, Bergstrand F, Twetman S. Caries-preventive effectiveness of a fluoride varnish: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. Caries Res. 2007;41(6):455-9. doi: 10.1159/000107932. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

  • Ogaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara SE. Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jul;120(1):28-35. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.114644.

  • Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Benson BJ. Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 May;101(5):403-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70112-N.

  • Demito CF, Vivaldi-Rodrigues G, Ramos AL, Bowman SJ. The efficacy of a fluoride varnish in reducing enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004 Nov;7(4):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00305.x.

  • Msallam FA, Grawish ME, Hafez AM, Abdelnaby YL. Decalcification prevention around orthodontic brackets bonded to bleached enamel using different topical agents. Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0170-4. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

  • Sharda S, Gupta A, Goyal A, Gauba K. Remineralization potential and caries preventive efficacy of CPP-ACP/Xylitol/Ozone/Bioactive glass and topical fluoride combined therapy versus fluoride mono-therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2021 Aug;79(6):402-417. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1869827. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

  • Hochli D, Hersberger-Zurfluh M, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Interventions for orthodontically induced white spot lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017 Apr 1;39(2):122-133. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw065.

  • Tahmasbi S, Mousavi S, Behroozibakhsh M, Badiee M. Prevention of white spot lesions using three remineralizing agents: An in vitro comparative study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Winter;13(1):36-42. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.006. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

  • Lale S, Solak H, Hincal E, Vahdettin L. In Vitro Comparison of Fluoride, Magnesium, and Calcium Phosphate Materials on Prevention of White Spot Lesions around Orthodontic Brackets. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 30;2020:1989817. doi: 10.1155/2020/1989817. eCollection 2020.

  • Hu H, Feng C, Jiang Z, Wang L, Shrestha S, Yan J, Shu Y, Ge L, Lai W, Hua F, Long H. Effectiveness of remineralizing agents in the prevention and reversal of orthodontically induced white spot lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4153-4167. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03610-z. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

  • Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982 Feb;81(2):93-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-x.

  • Grocholewicz K, Miklasz P, Zawislak A, Sobolewska E, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. Fluoride varnish, ozone and octenidine reduce the incidence of white spot lesions and caries during orthodontic treatment: randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 17;12(1):13985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18107-w.

Study Officials

  • Katarzyna Grocholewicz, DDS, PhD

    Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The patients have been randomly divided (using number random generator) into five groups (n=30), including four study groups (I, II, III, IV) and one control group (K).
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: To participate in the study 167 healthy adults (16-50 years) who began orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances bonded to both dental arches were eligible and consecutively invited. Informed consent was obtained from 150 patients (111 women and 39 men). The patients have been randomly divided (using number random generator) into five groups (n=30), including four study groups (I, II, III, IV) and one control group (K).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2021

First Posted

August 5, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 30, 2016

Study Completion

June 30, 2016

Last Updated

August 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share