NCT04986358

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to make a precise inventory of the complications that may occur postoperatively in the more or less long term in a cohort of patients who should benefit from surgical management of Hallux Valgus.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
479

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 5, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 19, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Hallux ValgusComplications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Onset complication within 1 year after the intervention

    Collection of the type of complication and its degree of severity (Clavien Dindo classification)

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Evaluation of patient satisfaction

    2 years

  • Onset all complications within 2 years after the intervention

    2 years

Study Arms (1)

Patient cohorte

OTHER

Cohort of patients who will benefit from surgical management of their Hallux Valgus with post-operative follow-up at 2 years

Other: Follow up at 2 years

Interventions

The patients will have a follow-up to carry out 2 years after their intervention in addition to their traditional care

Patient cohorte

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with medical insurance.
  • Patient who recieved information about study and signes a consent to participate in the study.
  • Major patient requiring surgical management of a Hallux Valgus.

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor patient.
  • Patient participating in another interventional study.
  • Patient with one of the following pathologies: Rheumatoid arthritis, haemophilia, inflammatory rheumatism or neurological spasticity.
  • Patient to undergo a one-step bilateral Hallux Valgus surgical treatment (surgery of both feet on the same day).
  • Patient refusing to sign the consent form.
  • Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information.
  • Patient under the protection of justice, under curatorship ou under tutorship.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinique Saint Jean

Saint-Jean-de-Védas, 34430, France

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Monteagudo M, Martinez-de-Albornoz P. Management of Complications After Hallux Valgus Reconstruction. Foot Ankle Clin. 2020 Mar;25(1):151-167. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

    PMID: 31997742BACKGROUND
  • Barg A, Harmer JR, Presson AP, Zhang C, Lackey M, Saltzman CL. Unfavorable Outcomes Following Surgical Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Systematic Literature Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 19;100(18):1563-1573. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00975.

    PMID: 30234626BACKGROUND
  • Raikin SM, Miller AG, Daniel J. Recurrence of hallux valgus: a review. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Jun;19(2):259-74. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 29.

    PMID: 24878414BACKGROUND
  • Filippi J, Briceno J. Complications after Metatarsal Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus: Malunion, Nonunion, Avascular Necrosis, and Metatarsophalangeal Osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2020 Mar;25(1):169-182. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

    PMID: 31997743BACKGROUND
  • Lee KB, Kim MS, Park KS, Lee GW. Importance of postoperative sesamoid reduction on the outcomes of proximal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Aug;25(4):434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

    PMID: 30321971BACKGROUND
  • Lee KT, Park YU, Jegal H, Lee TH. Deceptions in hallux valgus: what to look for to limit failures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Sep;19(3):361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

    PMID: 25129349BACKGROUND
  • Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Sep 27;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-21.

    PMID: 20868524BACKGROUND
  • Zambelli R, Baumfeld D. Intraoperative and Postoperative Evaluation of Hallux Valgus Correction: What Is Important? Foot Ankle Clin. 2020 Mar;25(1):127-139. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

    PMID: 31997740BACKGROUND
  • Bock P, Kluger R, Kristen KH, Mittlbock M, Schuh R, Trnka HJ. The Scarf Osteotomy with Minimally Invasive Lateral Release for Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: Intermediate and Long-Term Results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Aug 5;97(15):1238-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00971.

    PMID: 26246258BACKGROUND
  • Jeuken RM, Schotanus MG, Kort NP, Deenik A, Jong B, Hendrickx RP. Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Scarf to Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Correction. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Jul;37(7):687-95. doi: 10.1177/1071100716639574. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

    PMID: 27009063BACKGROUND
  • Lee KB, Cho NY, Park HW, Seon JK, Lee SH. A comparison of proximal and distal Chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):202-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34449.

    PMID: 25628283BACKGROUND
  • Lai MC, Rikhraj IS, Woo YL, Yeo W, Ng YCS, Koo K. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparing Percutaneous Chevron-Akin Osteotomies vs Open Scarf-Akin Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):311-317. doi: 10.1177/1071100717745282. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

    PMID: 29241361BACKGROUND
  • Brogan K, Lindisfarne E, Akehurst H, Farook U, Shrier W, Palmer S. Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1197-1204. doi: 10.1177/1071100716656440. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

    PMID: 27381179BACKGROUND
  • Kaufmann G, Mortlbauer L, Hofer-Picout P, Dammerer D, Ban M, Liebensteiner M. Five-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Chevron Osteotomy in Comparison with the Open Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 20;102(10):873-879. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00981.

    PMID: 32149929BACKGROUND
  • Chong A, Nazarian N, Chandrananth J, Tacey M, Shepherd D, Tran P. Surgery for the correction of hallux valgus: minimum five-year results with a validated patient-reported outcome tool and regression analysis. Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):208-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34891.

    PMID: 25628284BACKGROUND
  • Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P, Jenkinson C. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb;94(2):215-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27634.

    PMID: 22323689BACKGROUND
  • Coughlin MJ, Freund E. Roger A. Mann Award . The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2001 May;22(5):369-79. doi: 10.1177/107110070102200503.

    PMID: 11428754BACKGROUND
  • Lee KM, Ahn S, Chung CY, Sung KH, Park MS. Reliability and relationship of radiographic measurements in hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2613-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2368-6. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

    PMID: 22544667BACKGROUND
  • Talbot KD, Saltzman CL. Assessing sesamoid subluxation: how good is the AP radiograph? Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Aug;19(8):547-54. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900808.

    PMID: 9728703BACKGROUND
  • Smith RW, Reynolds JC, Stewart MJ. Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle. 1984 Sep-Oct;5(2):92-103. doi: 10.1177/107110078400500208. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6389278BACKGROUND
  • Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):932-66. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8666613BACKGROUND
  • Lewis TL, Ray R, Miller G, Gordon DJ. Third-Generation Minimally Invasive Chevron and Akin Osteotomies (MICA) in Hallux Valgus Surgery: Two-Year Follow-up of 292 Cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):1203-1211. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01178.

    PMID: 33764936BACKGROUND
  • Lehman DE. Salvage of complications of hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003 Mar;8(1):15-35. doi: 10.1016/s1083-7515(02)00130-4.

    PMID: 12760572BACKGROUND
  • Costa MT, de Almeida Pinto RZ, Ferreira RC, Sakata MA, Frizzo GG, Santin RA. OSTEOTOMY OF THE FIRST METATARSAL BASE ON THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE HALLUX VALGUS RESULTS AFTER MEAN FOLLOW-UP TIME OF EIGHT YEARS. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;44(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30075-6. eCollection 2009 Jan.

    PMID: 27004179BACKGROUND
  • Fuhrmann RA, Zollinger-Kies H, Kundert HP. Mid-term results of Scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus. Int Orthop. 2010 Oct;34(7):981-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0958-z. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

    PMID: 20157812BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hallux Valgus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Foot DeformitiesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Wayan HEBRARD, MD

    Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Patient cohorte
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2021

First Posted

August 2, 2021

Study Start

January 5, 2022

Primary Completion

October 19, 2024

Study Completion

October 19, 2025

Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations