NCT04985695

Brief Summary

Randomized controlled trial (1:1) in two parallel groups, multicentric, open-label, comparing two locoregional anesthesia (LRA) techniques as integral parts of multimodal analgesia: the control group will benefit from epidural anesthesia, while the experimental group will benefit from bilateral placement of catheters in the sheath of the rectus abdominis muscles.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
35mo left

Started Oct 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
Oct 2021Apr 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2021

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 11, 2021

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2028

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 10, 2029

Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

postoperative rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in total QoR-15 score

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) included five dimensions: physical comfort, emotional state, pain, psychological support and physical independence. Each item was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (for positive itel, 0="none of the time" to 10="all the time"; for negative items the scoring was reversed).

    Postoperative day 2

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Change in total Qor-15 score on postoperative days 1 and 3 compared to the day before surgery

    Postoperative days 1, and 3

  • Efficacy of postoperative analgesia

    Day 0 and Postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 30

  • Impact of arterial hypotension

    Postoperative days 1, 2 and 3

  • Impact of orthostatic hypotension

    Postoperative days 1, 2 and 3

  • Occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting

    Day 0, Postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 and at hospital discharge up to 30 days

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Thoracic epidural anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia during midline laparotomy

Drug: Epidural analgesiaProcedure: Laparotomy

Bilateral rectus sheath block

EXPERIMENTAL

Bilateral rectus sheath block during midline laparotomy

Drug: Bilateral rectus sheath blockProcedure: Laparotomy

Interventions

All patients received local anesthesia (3-5 ml of 2% Lidocaine). During the preoperative induction of anaesthesia a catheter was inserted 4cm into the epidural space. The catheter will be load during the intervention (0.1 ml/kg/h). In postoperative situation, a patient controlled epidural analgesia was introduced with a debit adapted to the arterial pressure.

Thoracic epidural anesthesia
LaparotomyPROCEDURE

A midline sub or supra umbilical laparotomy or xypho-pubian laparotomy

Bilateral rectus sheath blockThoracic epidural anesthesia

Bilateral rectus sheath block was performed Under general anesthesia and with ultrasound guidance. Rectus sheath block was inserted on each side of the abdomen. All patients received ropivacaine through elastomeric pump

Bilateral rectus sheath block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Class I-IV adult, with programmed midline laparotomy
  • Have given an informed written consent
  • Able to read and understand french language
  • Affiliation to a social security system

You may not qualify if:

  • Local anesthesic contraindication (allergy, porphyria, haemolytic anaemia, uncontrolled epilepsy, or severe cardiac conduction disorders) or TEA (coagulation disorders, progressive neurological disease, or severe spinal disorder),
  • Epidural analgesia contraindication
  • With impossibility to set up bilateral rectus sheath block
  • Participation in another clinical study
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision,
  • Patients undergoing psychiatric care under articles L.3212-1 and L.3213-1 of the French Public Health Code

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy

Metz, Moselle, 57085, France

RECRUITING

CHR Metz-Thionville Hopital Bel Air

Thionville, 57126, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Maury T, Elnar A, Marchionni S, Frisoni R, Goetz C, Becret A. Effect of rectus sheath anaesthesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery quality after elective open abdominal surgery in a French regional hospital: the study protocol of a randomised controlled QoR-RECT-CATH trial. BMJ Open. 2023 May 23;13(5):e069736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069736.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Analgesia, EpiduralLaparotomy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnalgesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Antoine BECRET, MD

    CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2021

First Posted

August 2, 2021

Study Start

October 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 10, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 10, 2029

Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

According to the French law and the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL), we won't be able to publicly share individual participant data, but we plan to share their conclusions through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

Locations