Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Influence of General and Local Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
248
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a modified cervical conization that is performed with an electrosurgical loop. It may be performed under local anesthesia (LA) or under general anesthesia (GA), and practice patterns differ widely. In some countries, specific guidelines for the choice of anesthesia during LEEP are provided, whereas, in other countries, the choice of anesthesia is not specified. LEEP under LA is more economical, obviating the need for anesthesia staff, equipment, and operating room fees. However, LEEP under LA may be more difficult to perform, may be more difficult to learn, may lead to inferior surgical results, and may result in more pain and patient dissatisfaction. This study aimed to compare loop electrosurgical excision procedures under local anesthesia vs general anesthesia regarding patients' satisfaction, histopathologic results, and short-term morbidity
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2022
CompletedMarch 3, 2023
March 1, 2023
9 months
July 25, 2021
March 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
visual analog scale 1
VAS score ( 0 cm = no pain, 10 cm = worst pain imaginable) reported for the pain felt at 1 hour after procedure.
up to 1 hour after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
visual analog scale 2
up to 2 hour after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Control
OTHERGA group intravenous 2-3 μ/kg fentanyl followed by 2 mg/kg propofol. were administered for anesthesia induction. After a laryngeal mask insertion anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of sevoflurane in an oxygen (60%) and nitrous oxide (40%) mixture to maintain a minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.8%-1.3%.
Study
OTHERIn the LA group, after positioning of the patient, 50 mg of lidocaine spray (5 pumps, 10 mg in each pump) were applied to the ectocervix, then 2 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was injected submucosally using a 27-gauge needle tip at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock locations in the ectocervix.
Interventions
According to the size of the cervix, a loop electrode size was selected. The electrical power for the loop electrode was set to 50 W cut and 45 W coagulation in blended mode. LEEP was performed by carefully passing the loop around the transformation zone from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock. An additional top-hat excision was performed in patients with a lesion deep in the cervical canal. After completion of the excision, hemostasis was exclusively obtained using the ball electrode in spray coagulation mode. No suturing or other methods were used for hemostasis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were \> 21 years old; were not pregnant
- The patient had one of the following indications for LEEP:
- histologyproven, persistent, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL);
- a histology-proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL);
- discrepancies between cytological reports and colposcopic impressions;
- investigation for unsatisfactory colposcopy;
- microinvasion or adenocarcinoma in situ on cervical punch biopsy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with cervical or vaginal infection; Patients with an abnormal menstrual cycle; who were taking anticoagulants, Patients with a coagulation defect Patients with mental incapacity Patients with previous hysterectomy with removal of the cervix Patients with a history of cervical cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kemal Gungorduk
Muğla, 35460, Turkey (Türkiye)
Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Education and Research Hospital
Muğla, 48000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor - Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2021
First Posted
July 30, 2021
Study Start
August 9, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
August 31, 2022
Last Updated
March 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03