NCT04984122

Brief Summary

The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a modified cervical conization that is performed with an electrosurgical loop. It may be performed under local anesthesia (LA) or under general anesthesia (GA), and practice patterns differ widely. In some countries, specific guidelines for the choice of anesthesia during LEEP are provided, whereas, in other countries, the choice of anesthesia is not specified. LEEP under LA is more economical, obviating the need for anesthesia staff, equipment, and operating room fees. However, LEEP under LA may be more difficult to perform, may be more difficult to learn, may lead to inferior surgical results, and may result in more pain and patient dissatisfaction. This study aimed to compare loop electrosurgical excision procedures under local anesthesia vs general anesthesia regarding patients' satisfaction, histopathologic results, and short-term morbidity

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
248

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 9, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • visual analog scale 1

    VAS score ( 0 cm = no pain, 10 cm = worst pain imaginable) reported for the pain felt at 1 hour after procedure.

    up to 1 hour after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • visual analog scale 2

    up to 2 hour after the procedure

Study Arms (2)

Control

OTHER

GA group intravenous 2-3 μ/kg fentanyl followed by 2 mg/kg propofol. were administered for anesthesia induction. After a laryngeal mask insertion anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of sevoflurane in an oxygen (60%) and nitrous oxide (40%) mixture to maintain a minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.8%-1.3%.

Procedure: LEEP

Study

OTHER

In the LA group, after positioning of the patient, 50 mg of lidocaine spray (5 pumps, 10 mg in each pump) were applied to the ectocervix, then 2 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was injected submucosally using a 27-gauge needle tip at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock locations in the ectocervix.

Procedure: LEEP

Interventions

LEEPPROCEDURE

According to the size of the cervix, a loop electrode size was selected. The electrical power for the loop electrode was set to 50 W cut and 45 W coagulation in blended mode. LEEP was performed by carefully passing the loop around the transformation zone from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock. An additional top-hat excision was performed in patients with a lesion deep in the cervical canal. After completion of the excision, hemostasis was exclusively obtained using the ball electrode in spray coagulation mode. No suturing or other methods were used for hemostasis.

ControlStudy

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were \> 21 years old; were not pregnant
  • The patient had one of the following indications for LEEP:
  • histologyproven, persistent, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL);
  • a histology-proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL);
  • discrepancies between cytological reports and colposcopic impressions;
  • investigation for unsatisfactory colposcopy;
  • microinvasion or adenocarcinoma in situ on cervical punch biopsy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with cervical or vaginal infection; Patients with an abnormal menstrual cycle; who were taking anticoagulants, Patients with a coagulation defect Patients with mental incapacity Patients with previous hysterectomy with removal of the cervix Patients with a history of cervical cancer.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Kemal Gungorduk

Muğla, 35460, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Education and Research Hospital

Muğla, 48000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor - Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2021

First Posted

July 30, 2021

Study Start

August 9, 2021

Primary Completion

April 30, 2022

Study Completion

August 31, 2022

Last Updated

March 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations