Study Stopped
Investigator left organization before study initiated.
Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy
Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy Patients Receiving Moderate Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare an Enhanced Recovery Pathway to the current pre-operative/recovery practices of the endoscopy department on patient post-procedure outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedDecember 15, 2021
November 1, 2021
3 months
July 20, 2021
November 30, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare recovery time stamps before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
We will compare mean recovery times between control and intervention groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
1-2 hours
To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
We will perform a Chi-square analysis for presence or absence of nausea and/or vomiting in the recovery period (measured by: administration of anti-emetic, documentation on N/V flowchart, and/or documentation in nursing narrative note) between control and intervention groups.
1-2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare patient satisfaction scores before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
15 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Prospective Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALFor the experimental group, we will recruit 200 participants who will receive the Enhanced Recovery Pathway, which will be ordered as a standing order set by the attending provider and managed by their peri-procedural nurses. The modified ERP for this study includes the following interventions: nursing managed order sets with ERP instructions to receive goal-directed fluid management within anesthesia approved parameters utilizing the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol for IV fluid administration, PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis, early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters, and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters.
Retrospective Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe retrospective group will consist of 200 randomly selected medical records of patients who had colonoscopy procedures for a 6 month period prior to study implementation (between 10/1/2019 to 4/1/2020). The retrospective control group will have received the current standard of care including: IV fluids for management of intra-procedural hypotension as indicated/ordered by the physician, PO intake at 30-45 minutes, up to a chair at 60 minutes, and all procedure related complications will have been treated (e.g. PONV) per physician order as is the current standard of practice in the GI Lab recovery area.
Interventions
PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis.
Goal directed IV fluids to be administered starting preop per the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol (LR @ 5mL/kg/hr).
Patient transferred up to the chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters and patient safety.
Patient will be offered PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters and patient safety.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient colonoscopy under moderate sedation
- Colonoscopy Indications: Screening
You may not qualify if:
- More than one sedation procedure scheduled same day
- Allergy to ondansetron
- Past PONV requiring scopolamine patches
- Diagnoses: ESRD, heart failure, cirrhosis, long QT syndrome
- Patients requiring fluid restrictions, such as dialysis patients
- Post-procedure NPO requirements, such as procedure-related NPO status (stent placement, pneumatic dilation, etc.) or second procedure in another location
- High Fall Risk Patients
- Adults unable to consent
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (14)
Alghanem SM, Massad IM, Rashed EM, Abu-Ali HM, Daradkeh SS. Optimization of anesthesia antiemetic measures versus combination therapy using dexamethasone or ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0567-3. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
PMID: 19517165BACKGROUNDAmornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov 16;5(11):527-33. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.527.
PMID: 24255744BACKGROUNDBrown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R, Chan E, Kim MP. The Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs and Their Application in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-2-77.
PMID: 29977464BACKGROUNDApfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196.
PMID: 15190136BACKGROUNDEllett ML. Review of propofol and auxiliary medications used for sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;33(4):284-95; quiz 296-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3181eac371.
PMID: 20679780BACKGROUNDCrenshaw JT, Winslow EH. Preoperative fasting: old habits die hard. Am J Nurs. 2002 May;102(5):36-44; quiz 45. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200205000-00033.
PMID: 12006853BACKGROUNDGan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting--can it be eliminated? JAMA. 2002 Mar 13;287(10):1233-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.10.1233. No abstract available.
PMID: 11886298BACKGROUNDJoliat GR, Ljungqvist O, Wasylak T, Peters O, Demartines N. Beyond surgery: clinical and economic impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3824-0.
PMID: 30594252BACKGROUNDLichtenstein GR, Cohen LB, Uribarri J. Review article: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy--the importance of adequate hydration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):633-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03406.x.
PMID: 17697197BACKGROUNDLjungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
PMID: 28097305BACKGROUNDSaraghi M. Intraoperative Fluids and Fluid Management for Ambulatory Dental Sedation and General Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2015 Winter;62(4):168-76; quiz 177. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.4.168.
PMID: 26650497BACKGROUNDShaikh SI, Nagarekha D, Hegade G, Marutheesh M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: A simple yet complex problem. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):388-396. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.179310.
PMID: 27746521BACKGROUNDSom A, Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Arora MK, Baidya DK. Combination of 5-HT3 Antagonist and Dexamethasone Is Superior to 5-HT3 Antagonist Alone for PONV Prophylaxis After Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1418-1426. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001617.
PMID: 27870735BACKGROUNDWeinberg L, Faulkner M, Tan CO, Liu DH, Tay S, Nikfarjam M, Peyton P, Story D. Fluid prescription practices of anesthesiologists managing patients undergoing elective colonoscopy: an observational study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 10;7:356. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-356.
PMID: 24916073BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angela Maeder, PhD
Northwestern Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, RNC-OB, Clinical Nurse, Labor and Delivery Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2021
First Posted
July 30, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share