Intraocular Pressure Reduction Efficacy of Rhopressa and Lumigan in Normal Tension Glaucoma
NTG
1 other identifier
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness and the first leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide. The intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for all the spectrum of glaucoma. Reducing IOP in glaucoma increases the likelihood of preventing progression of the disease and preserving the quality of life of the patient. Although prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) and prostamides (PMs) are de facto first-line treatment options for managing glaucoma, it is a common clinical experience to see their treatment effects plateau to a level beyond which no clinically significant IOP reduction is likely. It is also common to find minimal IOP treatment effects in the following conditions: patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG), patients with thicker central corneal thickness (CCT), and patients with higher levels of corneal hysteresis (CH). CH is a possible proxy for the ability of the scleral tissue around the optic nerve to dissipate energy away from the optic nerve fibers. Netarsudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. There is a paucity of research on the efficacy of netarsudil in patients with NTG, thicker CCT, and higher levels of CH. This study aims to investigate the above issues by evaluating the efficacy of netarsudil and bimatoprost in subjects with NTG, thicker corneas, and higher levels of CH. Hypotheses
- Netarsudil will have non-inferior efficacy compared to Bimatoprost in treating NTG.
- Corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis will reduce the efficacy of netarsudil similar to bimatoprost in NTG.
- Netarsudil will change corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis similar to bimatoprost in NTG.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 6, 2021
August 1, 2021
11 months
July 19, 2021
August 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-treatment IOP
Change in IOPs (GAT, DCT, and ORA) from baseline.
3 months post-treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Post-treatment IOP change by CCT
3 months post-treatment
Post-treatment IOP change by CH
3 months post-treatment
Post-treatment change in CCT
3 months post-treatment
Post-treatment change in CH
3 months post-treatment
Study Arms (2)
Group 1: Normal tension glaucoma subjects with thin corneas
EXPERIMENTALNTG subjects with CCT ≤ 540 nm will be randomized to receive either netarsudil or bimatoprost.
Group 2: Normal tension glaucoma subjects with thick corneas
EXPERIMENTALNTG subjects with CCT \> 540 nm will be randomized to receive either netarsudil or bimatoprost.
Interventions
Subjects will be randomly assigned to this group
Subjects will be randomly assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- New NTG patients naïve to treatment.
- Patient with 360 degrees open angles on gonioscopy.
- Patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathies (GON).
- Patients with three repeatable visual field defects over two visits.
- Subjects must have IOPs ≤ 21 mmHg and no recorded IOPs \> 21 mmHg at any time.
- Glaucomatous optic neuropathy and visual field criteria:
- Category 1 and 2 of the glaucoma diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO) will be adopted in this study.
- ISGEO Category 1 classification of glaucoma:
- Reliable and repeatable visual field defects consistent with a glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and either a vertical cup-disc ratio (VCDR) at the 97.5th percentile of the normal population (about 0.7 VCDR), or VCDR asymmetry between the right and left eyes at the 97.5th percentile of the normal population (i.e., about 0.2).
- ISGEO Category 2 classification of glaucoma:
- Visual field results are not definitive or are unattainable due to patient inability to perform an adequate quality test, and optic disc has VCDR of at the 99.5th percentile of the normal population (i.e., VCDR of about 0.9) or VCDR asymmetry between the right and left eyes at the 99.5th percentile of the normal population (i.e a CDR asymmetry of about 0.3).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with IOPs greater than 21 mmHg at any previous point in time
- Patients with corneal pathology
- Previous ocular surgery in the past 6 months
- Patients with any other types of glaucoma other than NTG
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to follow-up for a 3-month period
- Patients with systemic conditions where a non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy cannot be ruled out.
- Subjects who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering becoming pregnant
- Subjects who could be pregnant will be screened for pregnancy thus: Those who are not pregnant nor considering becoming pregnant and are not on any birth-control at the time of recruitment will be excluded from participation because of the risk of pregnancy unknown to the patient at the time of recruitment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Salus Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Roberts Eyecare Associates
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jingyun Wang, Ph.D
Salus University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2021
First Posted
July 29, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months to 1 year after after completion of study
- Access Criteria
- Access to IPD shall be obtained through email request from Edgar U Ekure (OD, MS, FAAO). Email: exe0003@salus.edu
1. Raw clean data for statistical analyses 2. Other data will be shared as needed