A Positioning Navigation Template for Assisting the Placement of Modular Hemipelvic Endoprostheses for Patients Undergoing Pelvic Bone Tumor Resection.
A Novel Positioning Navigation Template for Accurately and Precisely Assisting the Placement of Modular Hemipelvic Endoprostheses for Patients Undergoing Pelvic Bone Tumor Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Acetabular reconstruction in situ after extensive pelvic resection is technically challenging because the significant loss of bone stock and bony landmarks. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of an individualized navigation template for acetabular reconstruction following pelvic malignancy resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent type II or II+III pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis. In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 14), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the navigation template. To compare the displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery between the two groups, an innovative method based on pelvic CT was developed and a validation group of cases was used to assess the effectiveness of this measurement approach. In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without hip joint reconstruction were included. The displacements for the validation group were calculated and compared with 0 cm, the theoretical value. Subsequently, the displacements between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group were compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2021
CompletedJuly 28, 2021
May 1, 2021
7.6 years
May 30, 2021
July 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the change of acetabular rotation center before and after surgery between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group.
Compare the change of acetabular rotation center (the displacement displayed in centimeters) before and after surgery between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group based on preoperative and postoperative CT images.
"through study completion, an average of 2 years"
Study Arms (3)
the template-guided group
EXPERIMENTALIn the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis.
the traditional operation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the traditional operation group (n = 14), acetabulum was manually reconstructed using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis by the surgeon's experience.
the validation group
SHAM COMPARATORIn the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without acetabulum reconstruction.
Interventions
In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 14), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the navigation template. To compare the displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery between the two groups, an innovative method based on pelvic CT was developed and a validation group of cases was used to assess the effectiveness of this measurement approach. In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without hip joint reconstruction were included. The displacements for the validation group were calculated and compared with 0 cm, the theoretical value. Subsequently, the displacements between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group were compared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All the patients diagnosed with a pelvic tumor;
- Underwent limb salvage surgery following type II or II+III pelvic resection;
- Acetabulum reconstruction using a modular, titanium hemipelvic prosthesis.
You may not qualify if:
- A lack of postoperative CT images;
- Having undergone revision surgery or noninitial/primary resection;
- unable to calculate the hip displacement by the specific measurement method we proposed.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nong Lin
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donghua Huang
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2021
First Posted
July 28, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 31, 2020
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
July 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share