NCT04980729

Brief Summary

Background: Acetabular reconstruction in situ after extensive pelvic resection is technically challenging because the significant loss of bone stock and bony landmarks. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of an individualized navigation template for acetabular reconstruction following pelvic malignancy resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent type II or II+III pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis. In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 14), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the navigation template. To compare the displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery between the two groups, an innovative method based on pelvic CT was developed and a validation group of cases was used to assess the effectiveness of this measurement approach. In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without hip joint reconstruction were included. The displacements for the validation group were calculated and compared with 0 cm, the theoretical value. Subsequently, the displacements between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group were compared.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
7.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 30, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7.6 years

First QC Date

May 30, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Pelvic tumorAcetabular reconstructionNavigation templateHip rotation centerPlacement in situ

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the change of acetabular rotation center before and after surgery between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group.

    Compare the change of acetabular rotation center (the displacement displayed in centimeters) before and after surgery between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group based on preoperative and postoperative CT images.

    "through study completion, an average of 2 years"

Study Arms (3)

the template-guided group

EXPERIMENTAL

In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis.

Device: Acetabular reconstruction after tumor resection.

the traditional operation group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the traditional operation group (n = 14), acetabulum was manually reconstructed using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis by the surgeon's experience.

Device: Acetabular reconstruction after tumor resection.

the validation group

SHAM COMPARATOR

In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without acetabulum reconstruction.

Device: Acetabular reconstruction after tumor resection.

Interventions

In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 14), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the navigation template. To compare the displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery between the two groups, an innovative method based on pelvic CT was developed and a validation group of cases was used to assess the effectiveness of this measurement approach. In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without hip joint reconstruction were included. The displacements for the validation group were calculated and compared with 0 cm, the theoretical value. Subsequently, the displacements between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group were compared.

the template-guided groupthe traditional operation groupthe validation group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All the patients diagnosed with a pelvic tumor;
  • Underwent limb salvage surgery following type II or II+III pelvic resection;
  • Acetabulum reconstruction using a modular, titanium hemipelvic prosthesis.

You may not qualify if:

  • A lack of postoperative CT images;
  • Having undergone revision surgery or noninitial/primary resection;
  • unable to calculate the hip displacement by the specific measurement method we proposed.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasms

Study Officials

  • Nong Lin

    2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Donghua Huang

    2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study is a "Retrospective Cohort Study" through retrospectively collecting patients undergoing acetabulum reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection. The patients were interfered with or without the acetabular navigation template during the hip reconstruction process.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2021

First Posted

July 28, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 31, 2020

Study Completion

July 31, 2020

Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share