The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. Currently, there are no studies evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on post colonoscopy these abdominal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a random number generator. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive abdominal massages twice a day after colonoscopy, and participants assigned to the control group will receive only "routine care". The abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and satisfaction levels of the patients will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale. Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the physiological and psychological health levels of patients after colonoscopy and help them return to their daily life activities and social lives faster. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical application and help evaluate the effects of the use of the relevant intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2021
CompletedMarch 14, 2025
March 1, 2025
7 months
July 10, 2021
March 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Abdominal pain
Abdominal pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value
The end of the second day.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Abdominal distension
The end of the second day.
Other Outcomes (2)
Comfort
The end of the second day.
High Satisfaction
The end of the second day.
Study Arms (2)
Abdominal Massage Group
EXPERIMENTALAbdominal massage for 15 minutes twice a day application.
Placebo Group
NO INTERVENTIONAbdominal massage was not applied.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being of 18 years of age and above
- owning a cell phone
- having a body mass index below 30
- being conscious and having location
- people, and time orientation
- having no communication barriers
- being able to communicate in Turkish
- giving written informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- were receiving sedation
- having previously received intestine resection or other intestinal surgery
- having an uncontrolled psychopathological illness
- receiving colonoscopy for treatment
- having active lower gastrointestinal system bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34384, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (25)
Steffenssen MW, Al-Najami I, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Baatrup G. Patient-reported complications related to colonoscopy: a prospective feasibility study of an email-based survey. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S65-S70. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1535188. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
PMID: 30523730BACKGROUNDSumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.
PMID: 12145595BACKGROUNDErstad DJ, Krowsoski LS, Kaafarani HM. Abdominal Pain After Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):486-487. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.060. Epub 2017 Jan 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 28056353BACKGROUNDYi CH, Liu TT, Lei WY, Hung JS, Chen CL. Influence of Rectal Decompression on Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Physiology following Colonoscopy in Healthy Adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:4101248. doi: 10.1155/2016/4101248. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
PMID: 27651788BACKGROUNDLiu TT, Yi CH, Lei WY, Yu HC, Hung JS, Chen CL. Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jun;4(6):E725-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392223. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PMID: 27336061BACKGROUNDDevitt J, Shellman L, Gardner K, Nichols LW. Using positioning after a colonoscopy for patient comfort management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31820f9ac3.
PMID: 21455041BACKGROUNDKim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):190-204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190.
PMID: 30670909BACKGROUNDLynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109.
PMID: 25946475BACKGROUNDSteinberg EN, Howden CW. Randomized controlled trial of rectal tube placement for the management of abdominal distension following colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Nov;46(5):444-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70038-5.
PMID: 9402119BACKGROUNDHilzenrat N, Fich A, Odes HS, Krugliak P, Eidelman L, Gaspar N, Weisberg G, Rosenthal A, Delgado JL, Ginat R, Sperber AD. Does insertion of a rectal tube after colonoscopy reduce patient discomfort and improve satisfaction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):54-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.47.
PMID: 12518131BACKGROUNDLee JG, Vigil H, Leung JW. A randomized controlled trial of total colonic decompression after colonoscopy to improve patient comfort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03458.x.
PMID: 11197295BACKGROUNDLamas K, Lindholm L, Stenlund H, Engstrom B, Jacobsson C. Effects of abdominal massage in management of constipation--a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
PMID: 19217105BACKGROUNDLiu Z, Sakakibara R, Odaka T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Hattori T. Mechanism of abdominal massage for difficult defecation in a patient with myelopathy (HAM/TSP). J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1280-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0825-9. Epub 2005 May 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 15895308BACKGROUNDSinclair M. The use of abdominal massage to treat chronic constipation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Oct;15(4):436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
PMID: 21943617BACKGROUNDDehghan M, Fatehi Poor A, Mehdipoor R, Ahmadinejad M. Does abdominal massage improve gastrointestinal functions of intensive care patients with an endotracheal tube?: A randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;30:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
PMID: 29389471BACKGROUNDMcClurg D, Lowe-Strong A. Does abdominal massage relieve constipation? Nurs Times. 2011 Mar 29-Apr 4;107(12):20-2.
PMID: 21520798BACKGROUNDArabul M, Kandemir A, Celik M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Aslan F, Vatansever S, Unsal B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):523-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0416.
PMID: 23161296BACKGROUNDChou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
PMID: 26827847BACKGROUNDAyan M, Tas U, Sogut E, Arici S, Karaman S, Esen M, Demirturk F. [Comparing efficiencies of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol in patients with primary dysmenorrhea pain by using Visual Analog Scale]. Agri. 2013;25(2):78-82. doi: 10.5505/agri.2013.42103. Turkish.
PMID: 23720082BACKGROUNDGallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
PMID: 11719741BACKGROUNDKjeldsen HB, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J. Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain. Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):980-984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26310997BACKGROUNDGagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004.
PMID: 16153776BACKGROUNDUysal N, Eser I, Akpinar H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31824c235a.
PMID: 22472671BACKGROUNDAltun Ugras G, Yuksel S, Isik MT, Tasdelen B, Dogan H, Mutluay O. Effect of abdominal massage on bowel evacuation in neurosurgical intensive care patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):558-566. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12575. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
PMID: 33179847BACKGROUNDPreece J. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 May;8(2):101-5. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610.
PMID: 12188155BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
DİLEK ÖZTÜRK, MSc
specify Unaffiliated
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Aysel GÜRKAN, PhD
specify Unaffiliated
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2021
First Posted
July 28, 2021
Study Start
November 9, 2020
Primary Completion
May 31, 2021
Study Completion
May 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- No time limit
- Access Criteria
- No Access Criteria
Study results will be shared.