Comparing Semaglutide Versus Placebo on Intestinal Barrier Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (SIB)
SIB
A Randomized Parallel Comparison of Semaglutide Versus Placebo on Intestinal Barrier Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (SIB)
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study plans to learn more about the effect of semaglutide once weekly on intestinal permeability in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 16, 2024
CompletedMarch 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.8 years
July 16, 2021
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in lactulose mannitol ratio (LMR) test as a measure of intestinal permeability between treatment groups
The ratio of lactulose to mannitol will be measured in urine collected within 6 hours after ingestion of dual sugar. This ratio predominantly reflects small intestine permeability.
Week 16 (visit 6)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Differences between treatment groups in plasma LBP
Week 8 (visit 4), Week 16 (visit 6)
Differences between treatment groups in Serum zonulin
Week 8 (visit 4), Week 16 (visit 6)
Differences between treatment groups in Fecal Calprotectin
Week 8 (visit 4), Week 16 (visit 6)
Differences between treatment groups in plasma IL-6
Week 8 (visit 4), Week 16 (visit 6)
Differences between treatment groups in plasma IL-8
Week 8 (visit 4), Week 16 (visit 6)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Exploratory: determine the effect of semaglutide as compared to placebo on intestinal microbiota in relation to changes in intestinal permeability and inflammatory markers
Visit 6 (week 16)
Study Arms (2)
SC semaglutide
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a once weekly, subcutaneous, Semaglutide injection for 16 weeks in addition to the participants background metformin monotherapy. The participants in this arm will begin at a 0.25 mg dose during the randomization visit, at week 4 this will be escalated to a 0.5 mg dose and at week 8 it will be escalated again to a 1.0 mg dose if tolerable by the participant. If the participant cannot tolerate the 0.25 mg dose at randomization or the 0.5 mg dose at week 4 they will be withdrawn from the study.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will be given a once weekly, subcutaneous, placebo injection matching the Semaglutide experimental arm in addition to their background metformin monotherapy.
Interventions
Semaglutide 1.34 mg/mL solution for injection in 1.5 mL pre-filled PDS290 pen-injector provided by Novo Nordisk.
Semaglutide placebo, solution for injection, 1.5 mL pre-filled PDS290 pen-injector provided by Novo Nordisk.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial, except for protocol described pre-screening activities, which require a separate informed consent.
- Male or female, age above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin monotherapy
- Hemoglobin A1c \<8.0% (\<64 mmol/mol) on screening day
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥28 kg/m2
- Low-grade inflammation, defined as elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs- CRP \>1.0 and ≤10 mg/L). Impaired intestinal barrier function results in activation of inflammatory pathway; therefore, excluding subjects with no evidence of inflammation (hs-CRP ≤ 1 mg/L) will help to enrich our study population. Similar threshold for hs-CRP as a marker of "residual inflammatory risk" (29) has been previously used as an independent predictor of future vascular events (26, 30).
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product or related products.
- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child- bearing potential and not using a highly effective contraceptive method.
- Participation in any clinical trial of an approved or non-approved investigational medicinal product within 30 days before screening.
- Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardize patient's safety or compliance with the protocol.
- Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 60 days prior to the day of screening.
- Second anti-diabetic agent use within 3 months of screening.
- Chronic kidney disease defined as eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
- C-reactive protein (hs-CRP \>10.0 mg/L) to eliminate patients with acute inflammatory process at the time of screening.
- Any recent infection or antibiotic use within 3 weeks
- Regular use (more than a week duration) of anti-inflammatory medication (steroid or NSAIDs) within 3 months of screening.
- Regular use (more than a week duration) of any digestive health supplements, such as probiotics or prebiotics within 3 months screening.
- Diagnosis of chronic intestinal inflammatory disease such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or irritable bowel syndrome.
- Prior bariatric or bowel surgery
- Heart failure presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV.
- Presence or history of malignant neoplasm within 5 years prior to the day of screening. Basal and squamous cell skin cancer and any carcinoma in-situ is allowed.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- Novo Nordisk A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Anschutz
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neda Rasouli, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Onyiah, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2021
First Posted
July 28, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 16, 2024
Study Completion
October 16, 2024
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03