Delivery Pain and Postpartum Comfort
Effects of Acupressure and Shower Applied in the Delivery on the Intensity of Labor Pain and Postpartum Comfort
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study was aimed that acupressure applied on the BL32 point and shower application reduced the intensity of labor pain experienced by the pregnant women in the active phase of labor and increased their postpartum comfort
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2021
CompletedJuly 27, 2021
July 1, 2021
9 months
June 25, 2021
July 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Reduce labor pain
The participants were applicated acupressure, and shower as for birth pain. Pain has been evaluated with VASP.
Evaluation was done until delivery (on average between 8-12 hours)
Postpartum comfort levels
Postpartum comfort levels of the groups who received acupressure and shower in the postpartum period were evaluated.Postpartum comfort level has been evaluated with PPCQ.
2 hours after birth
A maternal information form
This form consisted of 13 items asking for the participants' sociodemographic characteristics
before birth
Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VASP)
This scale is a 0-10 cm ruler developed by Bond and Pilowsky (Hawker et al., 2011; Aslan and Öztürk, 2014; Kömürcü and Ergin, 2014; Bond and Pilowsky, 1996). VASP is a 10 cm ruler which assessment with "no pain" at one end and "worst pain" at the other end. A Turkish validity and reliability study of the VASP was performed by Aslan and Öztürk (Aslan and Öztürk, 2014; Kömürcü and Ergin, 2014; Aslan, 2004).
Evaluation was done until delivery (on average between 8-12 hours)
Postpartum Comfort Questionnaire (PPCQ)
The 48-item General Comfort Scale, developed by Kolcaba (Kolcaba, 1994), was first adapted into Turkish in 2008 by Kuğuoğlu and Karabacak, who also conducted a Turkish validity and reliability study on the scale (Kuğuoğlu and Karabacak, 2008). Based on the Turkish version of the GCS, Karakaplan and Yıldız (Karakaplan and Yıldız, 2010) developed the PPCQ. The PPCQ is a 5-point questionnaire with 34 items. Participants give items between 1 (strongly agree) and 5 points (strongly disagree). The lowest score possible is 34, and the highest score is 170, with higher scores indicating higher comfort levels.
2 hours after birth
Evalution labour pain
VASP was evaluated before and after acupressure and shower applications.
Evaluation was done until delivery (on average between 8-12 hours)
Evalution postpartum comfort
Postpartum Comfort levels were evaluated in the postpartum period.
2 hours after birth
Study Arms (3)
Acupressure group
EXPERIMENTALIn the acupressure uterine contractions were checked before the care application began. Acupressure was applied when the women's cervical dilation reached 4-5 cm, 6-7 cm and 8-10 cm. This method was applied 18 times during uterine contractions. The application stopped at the end of each contraction and resumed once another contraction started. No application was performed between contractions.
Shower Group
EXPERIMENTALThe shower group, uterine contractions were checked before the care application began. A shower was applied when the women's cervical dilation reached 4-5 cm, 6-7 cm and 8-10 cm. This method was applied 18 times during uterine contractions. The application stopped at the end of each contraction and resumed once another contraction started. No application was performed between contractions.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe women in the control group underwent routine hospital care. They were administered neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological methods to reduce labour pain.
Interventions
A researcher sat behind the women to comfortably access the sacral area and be in the appropriate position. The researcher then applied deep rotational pressure on the BL32 points until her nail bed colour changed to prevent any discomfort in the participants
During uterine contractions, these participants took a shower while standing, with a researcher on hand to assist her (average time: 20 minutes). The water's temperature was between 22°C and 26°C.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having a foetus in vertex presentation
- Having a foetus weighing 2.5-4 kg, as determined through ultrasonography
- Being primiparous
- Being between 37 and 42 gestational weeks with a single foetus
- Having planned to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery
- Not having used nonpharmacological pain control methods previously
- Having a cervical dilation less than 5 cm (Dabiri et al., 2014)
- Not having received analgesia or anaesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Were having a systemic disease during pregnancy (gestational diabetes, hypertension)
- Taking medication regularly
- Having a problem that prevented the woman from communicating
- Undergoing psychiatric treatment (pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy)
- Requiring an operative vaginal delivery (forceps, vacuum)
- Receiving pharmacological interventions for labour pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medipol University
Istanbul, 34180, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AYCA SOLT KIRCA, Phd
Kırklareli University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
DERYA KANZA GÜL, Md, Phd
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2021
First Posted
July 27, 2021
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 25, 2020
Study Completion
January 31, 2020
Last Updated
July 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share