NCT04977401

Brief Summary

The EPSILON study aims to comparatively evaluate the submucosal injection using ORISETM gel and glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2021

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2022

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 5, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection)Rectum polypearly gastric cancerendoscopic resectionsubmucosal injection solution

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure

    Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure (defined as the dissected surface (mm2)/ESD duration (min). The dissected surface is defined as maximal diameter of specimen (mm) x perpendicular minimal diameter of specimen (mm) measured on ex-vivo pinned stretched specimen onto a cork. ESD duration is defined as the time from first submucosal injection to final cut time.

    At day 0 during ESD

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Total procedure duration

    At day 0 during ESD

Other Outcomes (13)

  • Number of per-procedural bleeding

    At day 0 during ESD

  • Total hemostatic time

    At day 0 during ESD

  • Need for haemostatic forceps

    At day 0 during ESD

  • +10 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group Glycerol

SHAM COMPARATOR

Submucosal injection using glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.

Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissectionDevice: use of glycerol as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Group Gel ORISE

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Submucosal injection using ORISETM gel during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.

Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissectionDevice: use of Orise Gel as lifting agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Interventions

Dissecting superficial gastric or rectal lesion/polyp after injection of the submucosa for lifting, using a electrosurgical knife through the endoscope

Group Gel ORISEGroup Glycerol

Injection of some colloidal solution (ORISE gel) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.

Group Gel ORISE

Injection of some colloidal solution (glycerol) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.

Group Glycerol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • o Patients must have given written informed consent
  • o Subjects with documented gastric or rectal lesions with indication of endoscopic removal by ESD, namely:
  • Gastric focal lesion with suspicion of early gastric cancer (low or high grade dysplasia with features of early gastric cancer; adenocarcinoma with morphology of superficial lesion and work-up of superficial lesion)
  • Rectal polyps (adenoma or superficial carcinoma) from 0 to 15 cm from the anal margin; with features being recognized indications of ESD: more than 20mm granular LST, more than 20mm non granular LST, more than 20mm villous or bulging polyps, Paris 0-IIa+IIc lesions, lesions with suspicious pattern (Kudo Vi / JNET 2B), lesions with anal canal involvement.

You may not qualify if:

  • Gastric and rectal neuroendocrine tumour (NET) with indication of ESD will be excluded
  • Gastric and rectal lesions with indication of ESD but strong fibrosis due to previous partial resection will be excluded
  • Subject is currently enrolled in another confounding research
  • Subjects with any other location of ESD (esophagus, duodenum and colon) will not be included.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles. (ULB)

Brussels, 1070, Belgium

Location

Evangelisches Krankenhaus

Düsseldorf, 40217, Germany

Location

Keio University Hospital

Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

    PMID: 19693750BACKGROUND
  • Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 21;14(27):4289-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4289.

  • Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using flexknife. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 May-Jun;40(5):378-84. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200605000-00004.

  • Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2666-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1627-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

  • Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):763-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, Conio M, Haringsma J, Langner C, Meisner S, Messmann H, Morino M, Neuhaus H, Piessevaux H, Rugge M, Saunders BP, Robaszkiewicz M, Seewald S, Kashin S, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Deprez PH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

  • Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Mizushima Y, Oka M, Enomoto S, Kakushima N, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Iguchi M, Shimizu Y, Ichinose M, Omata M. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2004 Jul;36(7):579-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814517.

  • Castro R, Libanio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):777-788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777.

  • Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sagara Y, Okada M, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Miura Y, Sunada K, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

  • Yamamoto H, Hayashi Y, Despott EJ. The pocket-creation method for endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with saline-immersion: another potential option to overcome challenges in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug;90(2):288-289. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.244. No abstract available.

  • Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):570-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861352.

  • Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.

  • Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakamura H, Hotta K, Horimatsu T, Sakamoto N, Fu KI, Tsuruta O, Kawano H, Kashida H, Takeuchi Y, Machida H, Kusaka T, Yoshida N, Hirata I, Terai T, Yamano HO, Kaneko K, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi Y, Tamai N, Nakano N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Iwatate M, Ishikawa H, Murakami Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):526-33. doi: 10.1111/den.12644. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Arnaud Lemmers, MD,PhD

    Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles. (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
A computer-based block randomization scheme will be created using block randomization and stratifying by center and by organ type (stomach/rectum). Data will be collected through a printed CRFs and then anonymized and entered into a central web based secured platform.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A multicentric, randomized, open label prospective study: * All subjects with indications of gastric and rectal ESD undergo screening and baseline visit * Informed consent is obtained when scheduling the ESD procedure * Randomization is made at the time of the ESD procedure after confirmation of the indication * ESD is performed using a 25 G needle, a dual-knife-J with glycerol (standard solution) or ORISETM gel in order to remove the lesion en-bloc. Additional saline injection through the electrosurgical knife will be left at the discretion of the endoscopist * A follow-up visit is scheduled at 2-4 weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, Professor, Head of Clinic, Endoscopy Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2021

First Posted

July 26, 2021

Study Start

September 21, 2021

Primary Completion

December 15, 2022

Study Completion

January 5, 2023

Last Updated

October 23, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations