Study Stopped
Urgent Medical Device Product (ORISE Gel Submucosal Liftiong Agent) Removal by sponsor
EndoscoPic Submucosal dIssection Using geL Versus glycerOl for Submucosal iNjection
EPSILON
1 other identifier
interventional
32
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
The EPSILON study aims to comparatively evaluate the submucosal injection using ORISETM gel and glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2023
CompletedOctober 23, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.2 years
July 8, 2021
October 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure
Increase the dissection speed of the ESD procedure (defined as the dissected surface (mm2)/ESD duration (min). The dissected surface is defined as maximal diameter of specimen (mm) x perpendicular minimal diameter of specimen (mm) measured on ex-vivo pinned stretched specimen onto a cork. ESD duration is defined as the time from first submucosal injection to final cut time.
At day 0 during ESD
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Total procedure duration
At day 0 during ESD
Other Outcomes (13)
Number of per-procedural bleeding
At day 0 during ESD
Total hemostatic time
At day 0 during ESD
Need for haemostatic forceps
At day 0 during ESD
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group Glycerol
SHAM COMPARATORSubmucosal injection using glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Group Gel ORISE
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubmucosal injection using ORISETM gel during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Interventions
Dissecting superficial gastric or rectal lesion/polyp after injection of the submucosa for lifting, using a electrosurgical knife through the endoscope
Injection of some colloidal solution (ORISE gel) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.
Injection of some colloidal solution (glycerol) in the submucosal layer in order to obtain long lifting effect and thus allowing the endoscopist to dissect under the lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- o Patients must have given written informed consent
- o Subjects with documented gastric or rectal lesions with indication of endoscopic removal by ESD, namely:
- Gastric focal lesion with suspicion of early gastric cancer (low or high grade dysplasia with features of early gastric cancer; adenocarcinoma with morphology of superficial lesion and work-up of superficial lesion)
- Rectal polyps (adenoma or superficial carcinoma) from 0 to 15 cm from the anal margin; with features being recognized indications of ESD: more than 20mm granular LST, more than 20mm non granular LST, more than 20mm villous or bulging polyps, Paris 0-IIa+IIc lesions, lesions with suspicious pattern (Kudo Vi / JNET 2B), lesions with anal canal involvement.
You may not qualify if:
- Gastric and rectal neuroendocrine tumour (NET) with indication of ESD will be excluded
- Gastric and rectal lesions with indication of ESD but strong fibrosis due to previous partial resection will be excluded
- Subject is currently enrolled in another confounding research
- Subjects with any other location of ESD (esophagus, duodenum and colon) will not be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles. (ULB)
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Düsseldorf, 40217, Germany
Keio University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
Related Publications (13)
Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
PMID: 19693750BACKGROUNDFujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 21;14(27):4289-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4289.
PMID: 18666315RESULTKodashima S, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using flexknife. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 May-Jun;40(5):378-84. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200605000-00004.
PMID: 16721217RESULTPark YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2666-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1627-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
PMID: 21424201RESULTLian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):763-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PMID: 22884100RESULTPimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, Conio M, Haringsma J, Langner C, Meisner S, Messmann H, Morino M, Neuhaus H, Piessevaux H, Rugge M, Saunders BP, Robaszkiewicz M, Seewald S, Kashin S, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Deprez PH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PMID: 26317585RESULTFujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Mizushima Y, Oka M, Enomoto S, Kakushima N, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Iguchi M, Shimizu Y, Ichinose M, Omata M. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2004 Jul;36(7):579-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814517.
PMID: 15243878RESULTCastro R, Libanio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):777-788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777.
PMID: 30809079RESULTTakezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sagara Y, Okada M, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Miura Y, Sunada K, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
PMID: 30716306RESULTYamamoto H, Hayashi Y, Despott EJ. The pocket-creation method for endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with saline-immersion: another potential option to overcome challenges in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug;90(2):288-289. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.244. No abstract available.
PMID: 31327340RESULTEndoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):570-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861352.
PMID: 15933932RESULTHewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
PMID: 22609383RESULTSano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakamura H, Hotta K, Horimatsu T, Sakamoto N, Fu KI, Tsuruta O, Kawano H, Kashida H, Takeuchi Y, Machida H, Kusaka T, Yoshida N, Hirata I, Terai T, Yamano HO, Kaneko K, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi Y, Tamai N, Nakano N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Iwatate M, Ishikawa H, Murakami Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):526-33. doi: 10.1111/den.12644. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PMID: 26927367RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arnaud Lemmers, MD,PhD
Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles. (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- A computer-based block randomization scheme will be created using block randomization and stratifying by center and by organ type (stomach/rectum). Data will be collected through a printed CRFs and then anonymized and entered into a central web based secured platform.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Professor, Head of Clinic, Endoscopy Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2021
First Posted
July 26, 2021
Study Start
September 21, 2021
Primary Completion
December 15, 2022
Study Completion
January 5, 2023
Last Updated
October 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share