Toolkit for Optimal Recovery After Orthopedic Injury
TOR
1 other identifier
interventional
195
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a multi-site randomized feasibility trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Orthopedic Injury (TOR), a mind-body program to prevent persistent pain and disability in at-risk patients with acute orthopedic injury, versus a minimally-enhanced usual care (MEUC) control. TOR is a 4-session program delivered via secure live video to patients at risk for chronic pain, 1-2 months after an orthopedic traumatic injury. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether the study methodology (i.e., implementation, randomization, procedures and assessment of outcome measures) and delivery of TOR meet a priori set benchmarks for feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, necessary for the success of the subsequent efficacy trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 27, 2025
CompletedJune 27, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.9 years
July 13, 2021
April 23, 2025
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Feasibility of Recruitment Among All Patients
We will report number of participants who consented to participate out of those eligible, evaluated at the end of study. This number is not the same as the number who were actually enrolled and randomized in the trial (195).
At the end of the entire enrollment period of the study, which was about 1 year and 10 months.
Appropriateness of Treatment Program, Rated by Participants Randomized to TOR and Assessed by the Credibility and Expectancy Scale
A measure of participant's expectations and believed credibility for program (i.e. appropriateness), as assessed by the Credibility and Expectancy Scale. This scale has a range of 3 to 27 points, with higher ratings indicating more belief that the program is logical and will help with the intended outcome. This measure was the count of patients who scored above or below the scale's theoretical midpoint (i.e. the midpoint is not based on the collected data) on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale
Baseline
Feasibility of Data Collection
This outcome will assess the feasibility of collecting the data used to assess and compare the TOR intervention to MEUC (usual care); it is not looking at the data itself or comparing two arms, but just the feasibility of collecting it. To assess this feasibility marker of our intervention, we will report the number of patients who complete their study assessments, for both TOR and MEUC together, at all of their required timepoints in the study.
On the participant level, data was collected over the course of 4 months (baseline through followup). Counts reported here and described above were summed at the final end of all study activities (a total duration of 1 year 10 months).
Acceptability of Treatment (Satisfaction) Assessed With the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (Patients Randomized to TOR Only)
Participant's satisfaction with treatment received after completion of TOR was assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. In this questionnaire, items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 3 to 12, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. This measure is the count of participants in TOR who scored above the scale's theoretical midpoint (i.e. the midpoint is not based on the collected data) on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Assessed at Post-Test, which was approximately 4 weeks after a participant's enrollment in the study and baseline assessment.
Acceptability of TOR (Attendance for Patients Randomized to TOR)
We will the report total number of patients in the TOR intervention who attend all four sessions that are part of their intervention.
On the participant level, the data for this outcome was collected over the course of the intervention and its sessions (4 weeks). Counts of attendance were summed at the end of the study (~1 year and 10 months).
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Feasibility of Randomization/Adherence to Assigned Arm, for All Enrolled Patients
Assessed the counts for the study as a whole at the end of study completion, which was about 1 year and 10 months. On the participant level, the time from randomization to posttest took place over an average of 4 weeks.
Orthopedic Staff Feasibility of Referral
On the staff member level, the data for this outcome was collected over the course of the entire intervention/study (about 1 year and 7 months total from the start of referrals and participant enrollment in the study).
Fidelity to Study Procedures (Minor Deviations)
On the participant level, the data for this outcome was collected over the course of the intervention as well as the through the followup time point, a total of 4 months. Counts of deviations were summed at the end of the study (~1 year and 10 months).
Fidelity to Study Procedures (Major Deviations)
On the participant level, the data for this outcome was collected over the course of the intervention as well as the through the followup time point, a total of 4 months. Counts of deviations were summed at the end of the study (~1 year and 10 months).
Adherence to TOR Homework
On the participant level, the data for this outcome was collected over the course of the intervention and its sessions (4 weeks). Counts were then summed at the end of the study (~1 year and 10 months).
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Orthopedic Injury - Active
EXPERIMENTALThe Toolkit (TOR) is a 4-session, individual, live video, synchronous program developed specifically for patients with orthopedic acute injuries who are at risk for chronic pain and disability. The program teaches evidence-based mind-body skills (e.g., relaxation and mindfulness; myths about pain; activity pacing; acceptance and values based goal setting). Participants gain access to a website downloaded on their phones as an app. The website included explainer videos of skills and recordings of mindfulness and relaxation exercises. In addition, participants will receive usual care as determined by medical team.
Minimally Enhanced Usual Care (MEUC) - Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe MEUC is educational material, in the form of a physical hard-copy pamphlet and website downloaded as an app on their phones. In addition, participants will receive usual care as determined by medical team.
Interventions
The Toolkit (TOR) is a 4-session, individual, live video, synchronous program developed specifically for patients with orthopedic acute injuries who are at risk for chronic pain and disability. The program teaches evidence-based mind-body skills (e.g., relaxation and mindfulness; myths about pain; activity pacing; acceptance and values based goal setting). Participants gain access to a website downloaded on their phones as an app. The website included explainer videos of skills and recordings of mindfulness and relaxation exercises. In addition, participants will receive usual care as determined by medical team.
The MEUC is educational material, in the form of a physical hard-copy pamphlet and website downloaded as an app on their phones. In addition, participants will receive usual care as determined by medical team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female outpatients in the Level 1 Trauma Center of one of the 4 sites, age 18 years or older
- Sustained one more more acute orthopedic injuries (e.g., fracture, dislocation, rupture) approximately 1-2 months earlier (acute phase)
- Score ≥20 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) or ≥40 on the Short Form Pain Anxiety Scale (PASS-20)
- Willing to participate and comply with the requirements of the study protocol, including randomization, questionnaire completion, and potential home practice and weekly sessions.
- No psychotropics for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment or stable for \>6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose
- Cleared by orthopedic surgeon for activities using the injured limb within the next 4 weeks
- Able to meaningfully participate (e.g., English speaking and comprehension, stable living situation as determined by the medical staff at each site)
- A score of 8/10 or more on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire ONLY IF a participant is 65 or older, or if a participant's cognitive abilities are unclear to research staff
You may not qualify if:
- Serious comorbidity expected to worsen in the next 3 months (e.g., malignancy)
- Current untreated or unstable severe mental health conditions like bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or active substance use
- Current suicidal ideation
- Other unmanaged serious non-orthopedic injuries that occurred alongside the orthopedic injury (i.e., TBI, ruptured internal organs, etc.)
- Practice of meditation, or other mind body techniques that elicit the RR, for at least 45 total minutes a week each week over the last 3 months
- Currently in litigation or under Workman's Comp
- Surgery complications (e.g., uncontrolled infection, need for repeat surgery)
- Self-reported pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- University of Texas at Austincollaborator
- University of Kentuckycollaborator
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02140, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Organization
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Research assistants who assess outcomes and collect data after randomization, orthopedic surgeons, and statistician will be blinded. The study clinicians will be unblinded. The research assistant who enrolls participants and performs activities before randomization will be unblinded.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2021
First Posted
July 22, 2021
Study Start
September 21, 2021
Primary Completion
August 15, 2023
Study Completion
August 15, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2025
Results First Posted
June 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06