Standard Versus Flexible Tip Bougie for Videolaryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the flexible tip bougie with standard bougie for tracheal intubation using non channelled, acute angled video laryngoscope using modified intubation difficulty scale score as primary outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 13, 2025
CompletedMay 13, 2025
April 1, 2025
6 months
July 9, 2021
May 31, 2023
May 12, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale Score (mIDS)
Composite score of difficulty of tracheal intubation using the bougie devices minimum score is zero, maximum possible score is 10, higher values represent worse outcome. Total score is sum of sub scales, values are numbers Total 6 sub scale from N1 to N6 ( N1: 0-2, N2: 0-1, N3:0-5, N4: 0-1, N5 0-1, N6 0-1, so total mIDS score is sum of N1 to N 6 sub scales)
average 1 minute
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time to Successful Tracheal Intubation
less than two minutes
Laryngoscopy Time
less than one minute
Overall First Attempt Success Rate
average 1 minute
Anaesthetist's Visual Analogue Score for Ease of Use of the Bougie
average 1 minute
Study Arms (2)
Endotracheal intubation with C-MAC D Blade Videolaryngoscopy and Standard Bougie
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to standard bougie will be intubated using standard bougie (Frova® airway intubation catheter )
Endotracheal intubation with C-MAC D Blade Videolaryngoscopy and Flexi-tip Bougie
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to Flexi-tio bougie will be intubated using Flexi-tip bougie (P3 medical Ltd, Bristol, UK)
Interventions
Standard Bougie for endotracheal intubation
Flexi-tip Bougie for endotracheal intubation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients aged above 18, presenting for elective surgical procedures and requiring general anaesthesia tracheal intubation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are do not want to take part or do not give consent
- Patients below 18 years of age
- Patient physical status of ASA 4 and 5,
- Patients deemed to require awake intubation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
Coventry, West Midlands, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Cyprian Mendonnca
- Organization
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cyprian Mendonca, Phd, MD FRCA
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2021
First Posted
July 22, 2021
Study Start
August 23, 2021
Primary Completion
February 10, 2022
Study Completion
February 10, 2022
Last Updated
May 13, 2025
Results First Posted
May 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share