NCT04968054

Brief Summary

Inhalation anesthetics significantly can delay latency and reduce amplitude of cortical MEPs and SSEPs signals compared to intravenous anesthetics by acting on not only GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) receptors but also NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors, so total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been more preferred for neurophysiological monitoring follow-up during surgery. However, just less than inhalation anesthetics, the decrease of amplitude and the delay of latency also occur according to the dose dependant of propofol. Moreover, it can cause various adverse effects such as delayed recovery after anesthesia or propofol infusion syndrome, consequently, combined methods with other agents or conversion to other relative anesthetics are being made. Remimazolam is a ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, and unlike conventional benzodiazepine drugs, it is rapidly metabolized in plasma and not accumulates in the body for long periods of infusion or even with high dose administration. Recently, there have been repored that continuous infusion of 0.5-1.5 mg/kg of remimazolam has little effect on the motor evoked potential (MEPs) of cervical spine surgery patients, but this is a case report without the control group; further prospective studies are definitely needed. Therefore, in the case of using propofol or remimazolam for total intravenous anesthesia, we aim to investigate which intravenous anesthetic is more appropriate for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring by comparing the results of the somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) and MEPs according to these anesthetics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 20, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 2, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 2, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 18, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 13, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 16, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Latency of SSEPs

    The difference of SSEPs between the two groups (propofol vs. remimazolam) compared with baseline SSEPs

    At the 30 minutes after anesthetic induction (before surgical incision)

Study Arms (2)

Propofol group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Propofol group will be inducted and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol 2% and remifentanil under Shinider and Minto target controlled infusion (TCI) model, respevtively

Drug: Arm I (Propofol)

Remimazolam group

EXPERIMENTAL

Remimazolam group will be started total intravenous anesthesia with remiamazolam at 6 mg/kg/h at the time of anesthesia induction, and maintained at 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h.

Drug: Arm II (Remimazolam)

Interventions

Propofol group will be inducted and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol 2% and remifentanil under Shinider and Minto target controlled infusion (TCI) model, respevtively.

Propofol group

Remimazolam group started total intravenous anesthesia with remiamazolam at 6 mg/kg/h at the time of anesthesia induction, and maintained at 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h.

Remimazolam group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients who aged 20-70 years with ASA-PS 1-3, diagnosed of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament or cervical spondylotic myelopathy, in need of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

You may not qualify if:

  • Tolerance or hypersensitivity to benzodiazepine or propofol
  • Dependence or addiction to psychotropic drugs or alcohol
  • Previous brain-related neurosurgery
  • Inserted status of pacemaker
  • Inserted status of intracranial device
  • Steroids use during surgery
  • Pregnant women, subjects who lack the ability to make decisions and susceptible to voluntary participation decisions

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

GangnamSeverance Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Interventions

Propofolremimazolam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesOssification, HeterotopicPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2021

First Posted

July 20, 2021

Study Start

July 20, 2021

Primary Completion

May 2, 2023

Study Completion

May 2, 2023

Last Updated

October 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations