Comparison of IONM Between Remimazolam and Propofol
Comparison of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring According to the Use of Anesthetics During Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Spine Surgery Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inhalation anesthetics significantly can delay latency and reduce amplitude of cortical MEPs and SSEPs signals compared to intravenous anesthetics by acting on not only GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) receptors but also NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors, so total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been more preferred for neurophysiological monitoring follow-up during surgery. However, just less than inhalation anesthetics, the decrease of amplitude and the delay of latency also occur according to the dose dependant of propofol. Moreover, it can cause various adverse effects such as delayed recovery after anesthesia or propofol infusion syndrome, consequently, combined methods with other agents or conversion to other relative anesthetics are being made. Remimazolam is a ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, and unlike conventional benzodiazepine drugs, it is rapidly metabolized in plasma and not accumulates in the body for long periods of infusion or even with high dose administration. Recently, there have been repored that continuous infusion of 0.5-1.5 mg/kg of remimazolam has little effect on the motor evoked potential (MEPs) of cervical spine surgery patients, but this is a case report without the control group; further prospective studies are definitely needed. Therefore, in the case of using propofol or remimazolam for total intravenous anesthesia, we aim to investigate which intravenous anesthetic is more appropriate for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring by comparing the results of the somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) and MEPs according to these anesthetics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2023
CompletedOctober 18, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.8 years
July 13, 2021
October 16, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Latency of SSEPs
The difference of SSEPs between the two groups (propofol vs. remimazolam) compared with baseline SSEPs
At the 30 minutes after anesthetic induction (before surgical incision)
Study Arms (2)
Propofol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol group will be inducted and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol 2% and remifentanil under Shinider and Minto target controlled infusion (TCI) model, respevtively
Remimazolam group
EXPERIMENTALRemimazolam group will be started total intravenous anesthesia with remiamazolam at 6 mg/kg/h at the time of anesthesia induction, and maintained at 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h.
Interventions
Propofol group will be inducted and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol 2% and remifentanil under Shinider and Minto target controlled infusion (TCI) model, respevtively.
Remimazolam group started total intravenous anesthesia with remiamazolam at 6 mg/kg/h at the time of anesthesia induction, and maintained at 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients who aged 20-70 years with ASA-PS 1-3, diagnosed of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament or cervical spondylotic myelopathy, in need of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
You may not qualify if:
- Tolerance or hypersensitivity to benzodiazepine or propofol
- Dependence or addiction to psychotropic drugs or alcohol
- Previous brain-related neurosurgery
- Inserted status of pacemaker
- Inserted status of intracranial device
- Steroids use during surgery
- Pregnant women, subjects who lack the ability to make decisions and susceptible to voluntary participation decisions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
GangnamSeverance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2021
First Posted
July 20, 2021
Study Start
July 20, 2021
Primary Completion
May 2, 2023
Study Completion
May 2, 2023
Last Updated
October 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10