Comparison of Qutenza (8% Capsaicin) With a Low-dose Capsaicin for Treatment of Nerve Pain After Surgery
RISE
An Interventional, Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-site, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Qutenza® in Subjects With Post-surgical Neuropathic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
409
6 countries
64
Brief Summary
This is an interventional, Phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multi-site, clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of repeated topical application of Qutenza (capsaicin 8% topical system) versus low-dose capsaicin control (capsaicin 0.04% topical system) in subjects with moderate to severe postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for phase_3
64 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2025
CompletedApril 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
4.1 years
June 10, 2021
April 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline to the weekly average score of Week 12 in the 24-hr average pain intensity [Core Phase].
For the US. The 24-hr average pain intensity will be assessed and reported in the electronic diary (e-diary) once daily in the evening, using an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS, from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).
Change from baseline to the average score of the entire period between Week 2 and Week 12 in the 24-hr average pain intensity [Core Phase].
For non-US countries/regions. The 24-hr average pain intensity will be assessed and reported in the electronic diary (e-diary) once daily in the evening, using an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS, from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).
From the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84).
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change from baseline to Week 12 in the treatment area size [Core Phase].
Visit 2 (Day 1) and at Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Core Phase]
Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)
Incidence of TEAEs leading to discontinuation [Core Phase]
Visit 2 (Day 1) up to Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294)
Change from baseline to the average score of Week 42 in the 24-hr average pain intensity [Extension Phase].
Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1) up to the Final Visit (Week 42/Day 294).
Change from baseline to Week 42 in the treatment area size [Extension Phase].
Visit 2 (Day 1) and at Visit 6 (Week 12/Day 84)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Qutenza (capsaicin) 8% topical system
EXPERIMENTALQutenza (capsaicin 8% topical system, containing capsaicin 179 mg or capsaicin 640 µg/cm2 of topical system)
Low-dose capsaicin control
ACTIVE COMPARATORcapsaicin 0.04% topical system
Interventions
High concentration capsaicin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General
- The subject has given written informed consent to participate.
- Female or male subjects aged 18 years or older.
- For women of childbearing potential: negative pregnancy tests at Screening Visit (Visit 1), the Randomization Visit (Visit 2), and prior to each reapplication of the investigational medicinal product (IMP), and must have agreed to practice medically acceptable methods of birth control.
- Confirmation of diagnosis of chronic moderate to severe PSNP
- Documented diagnosis of PSNP by the following criteria:
- A history of post-surgical pain with a duration of at least 6 months to maximally 60 months that is plausibly related to the surgical intervention as documented on a body map.
- Douleur Neuropathique 4 interview (DN4i) of at least 3 out of 7 points at Visit 1.
- The pain must extend beyond the scar area to neuroanatomically adjacent skin areas and be related to the site of the surgery.
- Documented diagnosis of probable or definite PSNP according to the following criteria (Finnerup et al. 2016):
- The pain must be associated with sensory signs in the same neuroanatomically plausible distribution. The area of sensory changes may extend beyond, be within, or overlap with the area of pain (criterion for probable neuropathic pain), or
- In addition to 5a : Direct surgical evidence (e.g., surgeon´s clear verification of an intraoperative nerve lesion) (criterion for definite neuropathic pain).
- The subject has moderate to severe pain with a baseline value for 24-hr average pain intensity of at least 4 points on the NPRS. The baseline value is calculated as the average of the 24-hr average pain intensity ratings of the Baseline Phase (Day -7 to Day -1). At least 5 (out of the last 7 days) pain ratings should be available during the Baseline Phase. If less than 5 pain ratings are available in the last 7 days, the subject may be rescheduled for Visit 2 (1 time only) after having received appropriate re-training in the use of the e-diary to ensure compliance.
- Suitability for treatment with IMP
- The size of the affected painful intact skin area is not larger than the size of 4 standard Qutenza topical systems (1120 cm2).
- +8 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- General or previous treatments
- The subject received Qutenza before the Randomization Visit (Visit 2) or received a medical device in another clinical trial within 7 days before the Randomization Visit (Visit 2), or
- Any former use of topical capsaicin in the area of the PSNP before Visit 2, except for the use of a low-dose (\<1%) capsaicin product - but not within 7 days before Visit 2.
- The subject participated previously in this clinical trial or participated in another clinical trial for the treatment of PSNP completing less than 3 months ago.
- A score of 0 out of 5 in all 3 categories of the neurological/sensory examinations, i.e., for warm sensation, pinprick and cold sensation at the Screening Visit (Visit 1).
- Confounding factors
- The subject reported a 24-hr average pain intensity score of 10 on the NPRS for at least 4 days during the Baseline Phase.
- Any painful procedure planned during the course of the trial that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
- Subjects with PSNP related to a surgery/condition with a high potential for confounding symptoms, e.g., the pain is at least partially due to pain in deeper structures such as muscles or bones (including referred pain from deeper structures) as listed in examples.
- Other painful conditions in the body area that is affected by PSNP and may affect efficacy or safety assessments and cannot be discriminated from the target pain by the subject, including infectious, non-infectious, inflammatory or neuropathic conditions which could also be complications related to the previous surgical procedure.
- Non-exhaustive list of examples of types of surgeries/conditions not suitable for eligibility Any surgery performed due to suspected neoplasia: suspected residual neoplasia or metastases Conditions where nociceptive or neuropathic pain has been the reason for the surgery, e.g., failed back surgery, carpal tunnel syndrome or other nerve compression syndromes leading to neuropathic pain, (e.g., meralgia paresthetica) Conditions of projected neuropathic pain (i.e., from inguinal hernia repair) with painful symptoms in the genital region, e.g., the scrotum or vagina Amputations Radicular pain and nerve trunk lesions Scar pain neuroma Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Type I or Type II)
- Contraindications to IMP
- Neuropathic pain areas located only on the face, above the hairline of the scalp, and/or in proximity to mucous membranes.
- Hypersensitivity to capsaicin (i.e., chili peppers or over-the-counter \[OTC\] capsaicin products), or to any excipients of the IMP or to excipients of the cleansing gel in use and their components, or to topical anesthetics in use and their components.
- Medical history/concurrent condition(s)/other factors
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (64)
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
ILD Research Center
Vista, California, 92009, United States
International Spine, Pain, and Performance Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006, United States
South Lake Pain Institute
Clermont, Florida, 34711, United States
University Clinical Research - DeLand Clinical Research Unit
DeLand, Florida, 32720, United States
Florida Research Center, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33174, United States
Clinical Research of West Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Drug Studies America
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Neuroscience Research Center, LLC
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210, United States
Kansas City Bone & Joint Clinic, P.A.
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, United States
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
Bay City, Michigan, 48706, United States
Premier Pain Centers
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 07702, United States
Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
New York, New York, 10022, United States
Accellacare
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
META Medical Research Institute, LLC
Dayton, Ohio, 45432, United States
Main Line Spine
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, 19406, United States
New Phase Research & Development
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, United States
Expert Pain
Houston, Texas, 77079, United States
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee - Centre d'evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur
La Roche-sur-Yon, Pays de la Loire Region, France
CHU de Nantes - Hopital Nord Laennec
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, France
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, France
Centre Regional De Lutte Contre Le Cancer (Crlcc) -Centre Paul Papin
Angers, France
Centre Hospitalier Jean Rougier
Cahors, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHRU) de Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez
Lille, France
Clinique Francois Chenieux
Limoges, France
Cochin Hospital-Paris Descartes University
Paris, France
Groupe Hospitalier Paris saint-Joseph
Paris, France
CHU Poitiers / La Miletrie
Poitiers, France
VUMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
PT&R
Beek, Netherlands
NOCEPTA
Hengelo, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Leiden, Netherlands
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Katowice
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Silmedic Sp z o.o. Oddzial w Katowicach
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Vitamed Nzoz Im. Edyty Jakubow
Bialystok, Poland
Nzoz Neuro-Medic
Katowice, Poland
Linden Centrum Medyczne
Krakow, Poland
Instytut Zdrowia dr Boczarska-Jedynak
Oświęcim, Poland
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
Świdnik, Poland
Centrum Badan Medycznych Nigrir
Warsaw, Poland
FutureMeds sp. z o. o.
Wroclaw, Poland
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital Del Mar
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Moraleja
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Quironsalud Malaga
Málaga, Spain
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Spain
Clinica Gaias
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, Spain
Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - Northamptonshire
Corby, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - Yorkshire
Shipley, Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI) - NHS Grampian
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Accellacare
Coventry, United Kingdom
Leeds General Infirmary - Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, United Kingdom
Accellacare - (MeDiNova Limited) - North London
Northwood, United Kingdom
MeDiNova South London Quality Research Site
Sidcup, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2021
First Posted
July 19, 2021
Study Start
July 13, 2021
Primary Completion
August 28, 2025
Study Completion
August 28, 2025
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04