Closed-loop Oxygen Control for High Flow Nasal Therapy
HILOOP
Safety and Efficacy of a Closed-loop Oxygen Control for High Flow Nasal Therapy in ICU Patients: a Randomized Cross-over Study (The HILOOP Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), High Flow Nasal Therapy (HFNT) improves oxygenation, tolerance, and decrease work of breathing as compared to standard oxygen therapy by facemask. Current guidelines recommend adjusting oxygen flow rates to keep the oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in the target range and avoid hypoxemia and hyperoxemia. The hypothesis of the study is that closed loop oxygen control increases the time spent within clinically targeted SpO2 ranges and decreases the time spent outside clinical target SpO2 ranges as compared to manual oxygen control in ICU patients treated with HFNT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2021
CompletedDecember 9, 2021
October 1, 2021
4 months
May 4, 2021
November 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of time spent in optimal SpO2 range
The optimal SpO2 range will be defined according to the SpO2 targets determined by the clinician.
4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Percentage of time spent in sub-optimal SpO2 range
4 hours
Percentage of time spent out of range
4 hours
Percentage of time with SpO2 signal available
4 hours
Mean SpO2/FiO2
4 hours
ROX index
4 hours
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Oxygen close-loop
EXPERIMENTALFour hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen delivered will be automatically titrated based on SpO2 values.
Manual FiO2 adjustment
ACTIVE COMPARATORFour hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen delivered will be manually adjusted by the healthcare personnel based on SpO2 values.
Interventions
The Automatic FiO2 option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range. When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the Oxygen setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (\>17yo) patients admitted to the ICU treated with HFNT for at least 8h
- Requiring FiO2 ≥ 30% to keep SpO2 in the target ranges defined by the clinician
- Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case that the patient is unable to consent, after full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with indication for immediate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation
- Hemodynamic instability defined as a need of continuous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine \> 1 mg/h
- Low quality on the SpO2 measurement using finger and ear sensor (quality index below 60% on the Massimo SpO2 sensor, which is displayed by a red or orange colour bar)
- Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.30)
- Pregnant woman
- Patients deemed at high risk for need of mechanical ventilation within the next 8 hours
- Chronic or acute dyshemoglobinemia: methemoglobin, carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, sickle cell disease
- Tracheotomised patient
- Formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient deprived of liberties
- Patient included in another interventional research study under consent
- Patient already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Related Publications (4)
L'Her E, Dias P, Gouillou M, Riou A, Souquiere L, Paleiron N, Archambault P, Bouchard PA, Lellouche F. Automatic versus manual oxygen administration in the emergency department. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jul 20;50(1):1602552. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02552-2016. Print 2017 Jul.
PMID: 28729473BACKGROUNDHelmerhorst HJ, Roos-Blom MJ, van Westerloo DJ, de Jonge E. Association Between Arterial Hyperoxia and Outcome in Subsets of Critical Illness: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Cohort Studies. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1508-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000998.
PMID: 25855899BACKGROUNDArnal JM, Garnero A, Novotni D, Corno G, Donati SY, Demory D, Quintana G, Ducros L, Laubscher T, Durand-Gasselin J. Closed loop ventilation mode in Intensive Care Unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
PMID: 28679200BACKGROUNDRoca O, Caritg O, Santafe M, Ramos FJ, Pacheco A, Garcia-de-Acilu M, Ferrer R, Schultz MJ, Ricard JD. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w.
PMID: 35422002DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2021
First Posted
July 16, 2021
Study Start
April 27, 2021
Primary Completion
August 10, 2021
Study Completion
August 10, 2021
Last Updated
December 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share