Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol 25 μg vs. Vaginal Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor at Term
MISODINO
1 other identifier
observational
706
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Labor induction is a common medical technique. There is no consensus on which technique is better than the others. Misoprostol is an analogue of Prostaglandin E1 previously used off-label in labor induction. Its low cost, room-temperature storage, and diverse route options have made it an alternative to PGE2 in labor induction. As of 2018, oral misoprostol 25 μg tablet was licensed for labor induction. Very few studies have been performed on oral misoprostol 25 μg and none compared it with the PGE2s mostly used in induction on unfavorable cervix at term. The investigators compared the safety and the efficacy between the oral misoprostol 25 μg Angusta® used since 20/02/2020 and the vaginal dinoprostone previously used in gel or diffuser over two consecutive periods from 01/01/2019 to 19/02/2020 for the dinoprostone and from 20/02/2020 to 07/04/2021 for the misoprostol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2021
CompletedJune 12, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 months
July 5, 2021
June 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Variation of vaginal deliveries within 24hours patient number in both groups
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Variation of Cesarean section patient number in both groups
24 hours
Variation of indications for cesarean section in both groups
24 hours
Variation of uterine contractility abnormalities in both groups
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
PGE2
In period 1, the service protocol for induction at term on an unfavorable cervix indicated the use of a PGE2. In nulliparous women, Propess® was introduced intra-vaginally for 24 hours or until regular painful uterine contractions occurred. In the case of a multiparous woman, Prostine® gel, one or two mg depending on the cervical conditions at the time of induction, was introduced intravaginally and the cervix was reassessed after six hours. If the cervix remained unfavorable and the kinetics of the contractions were not optimal, a new dose of Prostine® one or two mg was administered to the patient.
misoprostol
In period 2, patients who were induced with an unfavorable cervix at term were induced with misoprostol. Regardless of parity, the patient received oral misoprostol 25 μg, one tablet orally every two hours until a maximum of eight tablets per day, or 200 µg, was reached, with cessation of the tablets when painful, regular contractions were obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
all patients requiring induction of labor with a singleton pregnancy at term, a gestational age greater than 37 weeks of amenorrhea, with a fetus in cephalic presentation and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score less than six)
You may qualify if:
- age of patient\> 18 years
- patients requiring induction of labor with a singleton pregnancy at term, a gestational age greater than 37 weeks of amenorrhea, with a fetus in cephalic presentation and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score less than six).
You may not qualify if:
- intrauterine fetal death,
- preterm pregnancy,
- scarred uterus
- contraindications to vaginal delivery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2021
First Posted
July 9, 2021
Study Start
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion
May 8, 2021
Study Completion
May 8, 2021
Last Updated
June 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share