: Protescal: Prevention of Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Formation Post Caesarean Section
Assessing the Effectiveness of Protescal In Preventing Post Caesarean Section Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Protescal in preventing post caesarean section hypertrophic scar and keloid formation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2021
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
June 1, 2021
6 months
May 30, 2021
June 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Name of the Measurement:Assessment of degree of caesarean wound healing. Measurement Tool:REEDA scale Unit of measure:"Percentage (%) of patients with..."
Wound healing assessed on 10th-day post caesarean section using REEDA scale of which the criteria assessed include redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and approximation. The REEDA Scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) scale assesses the inflammation process and tissue healing. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 15; whereby the higher the score denotes the more severe the tissue trauma and healing outcome.Percentage of patients in both groups with REEDA Scale scores of 0, 1-2 and ≥ 3 is determined.
Day 10th post caesarean section
Name of the Measurement : Assessment of Caesarean wound keloid formation & degree of scarring Measurement Tool : Modified Vancouver scar scale (MVSS) Unit of measure:"Percentage (%) of patients with..."
Third-month post-caesarean section, the degree of scarring was assessed using the Modified Vancouver scar scale (MVSS) which assessed pigmentation, height, pliability and vascularity of the scar. This scale focused on six parameters including scar height and thickness, pliability, vascularity, pigmentation, symptoms of itch and pain to generate a score ranging from 0 to 18 points.For the purpose of this study, a hypertrophic scar (HTS) was defined as one which was raised by at least 2 mm and had a total MVSS of 5 points or more (4). Thus a higher score would means a more hypertrophic scar formation. If a patient had more than one MVSS recorded during their follow up, the highest value was used.
3 months post caesarean section
Name of the Measurement : Assessment of Caesarean wound keloid formation & degree of scarring Measurement Tool : Colour photograph of wound Unit of measure : "Percentage (%) of patients with..."
Third-month post-caesarean section, the degree of scarring was assessed by colour photography if deemed necessary for comparison purposes. This would also depend on patient's agreement to her scar being photographed. If agreeable and deemed necessary, thus a patient's assessment was supplemented with colour photographs for later review and comparison.
3 months post caesarean section
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Name of the Measurement: Assessment of pelvic adhesions noted during next caesarean section.Measurement Tool: Intra-operative visual assesment of pelvic adhesions noted during next caesarean section.Unit of measure:"Percentage (%) of patients with..."
3 years post caesarean section
Study Arms (2)
Protescal group
EXPERIMENTALCaesarean-section was done in the usual manner. The transverse suprapubic skin incision was made and abdominal layers opened as usual. After delivering the baby, uterine muscle is closed in two layers with braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). After hemostasis secure, 1 mL Protescal gel was applied at the uterine suture site in Protescal group. Peritoneal layer closed using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). Rectus sheath was sutured using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). Subcutaneous tissue closed interruptedly using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). Protescal gel (0.5 mL) was applied over the subcutaneous tissue prior to skin closure in Protescal group. The skin was then closed with the subcuticular method using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl 3-0).
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONCaesarean-section was done in the usual manner. The transverse suprapubic skin incision was made and abdominal layers opened as usual. After delivering the baby, uterine muscle is closed in two layers with braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). After hemostasis secure, No Protescal gel was applied at the uterine suture site in this Control group. Peritoneal layer closed using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). Rectus sheath was sutured using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). Subcutaneous tissue closed interruptedly using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl no 1). No application of Protescal gel (0.5 mL) over the subcutaneous tissue prior to skin closure in this Control group. The skin was then closed with the subcuticular method using braided absorbable suture, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl 3-0).
Interventions
Protescal gel (0.5 mL) was again applied over the subcutaneous tissue prior to skin closure in Protescal group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All women undergoing elective caesarean section, without any history of previous abdominal surgery ; who planned for further pregnancy and consented to participate in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient that allergic to protescal
- Patient with previous abdominal surgery
- Patient refusal or patients who are not able to give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anizah Ali, MD(UKM),MOG(UKM)
UKMMC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- control group receives no protescal application while study group does
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2021
First Posted
July 7, 2021
Study Start
April 26, 2017
Primary Completion
October 31, 2017
Study Completion
November 16, 2017
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06