Bioenergetics of Exercise-Induced Menstrual Disturbances
BioE
2 other identifiers
interventional
47
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Menstrual disturbances are frequently observed in physically active women and female athletes. Short term prospective studies have shown that diet and exercise interventions can lead to decreases in Luteinizing hormone (LH) pulsatility, however these studies are unable to capture further changes in menstrual status. One longer term prospective study over two menstrual cycles showed that weight loss elicited menstrual disturbances, but there were no quantifiable measurements of energy availability. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to assess how varying levels of energy deficiency created through a combination of caloric restriction and exercise affect menstrual function in young, premenopausal, sedentary women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2001
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2001
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2021
CompletedJune 24, 2021
June 1, 2021
4 years
June 1, 2021
June 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in frequency of menstrual disturbances (disturbances /cycle)
Frequency of menstrual disturbances including luteal phase defects, anovulation, oligomenorrhea cycles, and anovulatory cycles analyzed by daily urinary metabolites of estrone-1-glucuronide (E1G), pregnanediol glucuronide (PdG), and midcycle LH
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, intervention MC 1 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), intervention MC 2 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), and intervention MC 3 (28 days or the length of 1 MC)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in percent body fat
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, intervention MC 1 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), intervention MC 2 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), and intervention MC 3 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), & Post Study (days 1-7)
Change in metabolic hormones
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, Mid- study (week 3 of MC during intervention MC 2) an (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC), & Post Study (Days (d)1-7 of cycle
Change in cycle length (days (d))
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, intervention MC 1 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), intervention MC 2 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), and intervention MC 3 (28 days or the length of 1 MC)
Change in aerobic capacity
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, & Post Study (Days (d)1-7 of cycle
Change in body weight
Baseline Menstrual Cycle (MC) (28 days (d) or the length of 1 MC, intervention MC 1 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), intervention MC 2 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), and intervention MC 3 (28 days or the length of 1 MC), & Post Study (days 1-7)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Sedentary Control
EXPERIMENTALParticipants did not exercise but consumed a diet that has an appropriate number of calories to maintain body weight throughout the intervention (3 menstrual cycles).
Exercising control
EXPERIMENTALParticipants exercised but were given extra calories to remain in energy balance throughout the intervention (3 menstrual cycles).
15 percent energy deficit (ED1)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants exercised for the equivalent of 15 percent of their daily caloric intake needs throughout the intervention cycles.
30 percent energy deficit (ED2)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants exercised for the equivalent of 30 percent of their daily caloric intake needs throughout the intervention cycles.
30 percent energy deficit 15/15 (ED2)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants exercised for the equivalent of 15 percent of their daily caloric intake needs throughout the intervention cycles, and their dietary intake was decreased by 15 percent to total a 30 percent energy deficit.
60 percent energy deficit (ED3)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants exercised for the equivalent of 30 percent of their daily caloric intake needs throughout the intervention cycles, and their dietary intake was decreased by 30 percent to total a 60 percent energy deficit.
Interventions
Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had calories sufficient to maintain body weight. Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Exercise: Participants engaged in supervised exercise training in Noll Laboratory Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had calories sufficient to maintain body weight and additional calories to remain in energy balance. Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Exercise: Participants engaged in supervised exercise training in Noll Laboratory that was equal to 15 percent of the participants' daily caloric needs. Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had calories to meet metabolic needs (before 15 percent deficit exercise). Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Exercise: Participants engaged in supervised exercise training in Noll Laboratory that was equal to 30 percent of the participants' daily caloric needs. Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had calories to meet metabolic needs (before 30 percent deficit exercise). Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Exercise: Participants engaged in supervised exercise training in Noll Laboratory that was equal to 15 percent of the participants' daily caloric needs. Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had 15 percent less calories than those needed to meet metabolic needs. Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Exercise: Participants engaged in supervised exercise training in Noll Laboratory that was equal to 30 percent of the participants' daily caloric needs. Diet: Participants consumed meals in the General Clinical Research Center metabolic kitchen that had 30 percent less calories than those needed to meet metabolic needs. Diet composition was 55 percent carbohydrates, 30 percent fat, and 15 percent protein.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Weight 45-75 kg
- Body fat 15-35 percent
- BMI 18-25 kg/m2
- Nonsmoking
- \<1 hour/week of purposeful aerobic exercise for the past 6 months
- Documentation of at least two ovulatory menstrual cycles during screening.
You may not qualify if:
- History of serious medical conditions
- Medication use that would alter metabolic hormone levels
- Significant weight loss/gain (±2.3 kg) in the last year
- Current evidence of disordered eating or history of an eating disorder
- Taking exogenous hormonal contraceptives for the past 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Lieberman JL, DE Souza MJ, Wagstaff DA, Williams NI. Menstrual Disruption with Exercise Is Not Linked to an Energy Availability Threshold. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):551-561. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001451.
PMID: 29023359RESULTWilliams NI, Leidy HJ, Hill BR, Lieberman JL, Legro RS, De Souza MJ. Magnitude of daily energy deficit predicts frequency but not severity of menstrual disturbances associated with exercise and caloric restriction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jan 1;308(1):E29-39. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00386.2013. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
PMID: 25352438RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy I Williams, ScD
Penn State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Head, Department of Kinesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2021
First Posted
June 24, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2001
Primary Completion
April 30, 2005
Study Completion
April 30, 2005
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share