A Phase 2 Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spasmodic Dysphonia (SD) is a focal, action-specific movement disorder with prominent effects on speech (1, 2). Patients with SD lose their ability to speak normally due to involuntary contractions of their laryngeal muscles. As a result, SD tremendously affects an individual's quality of life by limiting their ability to communicate effectively. The current standard of care for SD involves botulinum toxin (BTX) injections into the laryngeal muscles. BTX causes a weakness in the injected muscles thereby lessening the spasms (3). The primary neurological problem is not changed but weakening the muscles temporarily diminishes the symptoms. However, BTX therapy is associated with several limitations (3, 4). First, the clinical effect produced by BTX is temporary and repeated injections are required approximately every 3 months. Second, there is a delay in the onset of benefits provided by BTX injections; this delay results in a sinusoidal symptom curve where SD is optimally controlled for only a portion of each treatment cycle and patients' spasms return prior to the next injection cycle. Furthermore, the injections can be very painful and some patients develop antibodies to BTX (3, 4). Oral medications used in dystonia, such as anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and baclofen, provide minimal relief and have numerous side effects at the doses required to influence a patient's voice. Thus, on basis of these limitations, we set out to explore new and innovative strategies to treat SD and provide patients with long-term benefit. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that involves the implantation of electrodes to deliver electrical stimuli to specific brain regions. It is the gold-standard surgical treatment for other movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease and generalized dystonia. During a DBS procedure, an electrode is inserted very precisely into the brain and is linked to a pacemaker implanted under the skin of the chest or abdominal wall. When the pacemaker is switched on, a very small electric current passes into the brain, blocking the damaging signals that cause the condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedNovember 1, 2022
October 1, 2022
2.7 years
June 16, 2021
October 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Voice-Related Quality of Life as assessed by the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire.
The primary endpoint will be the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) reported by the patients after three months of blinded DBS-ON or DBS-OFF
6 months
Study Arms (2)
DBS On
EXPERIMENTALDBS Off
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of spasmodic dysphonia (evaluated by 2 centres - one team in Vancouver and the other team in Indiana)
- Patient is receiving Botox treatments
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have muscle tension dysphonia or vocal tremor
- Patients who have had laryngeal denervation surgery
- Patients who have intracranial pathology
- Patients who have a neurodegenerative disease
- Patients with bleeding diathesis
- Patients with mild symptoms
- Patients who have any of the following MRI contraindications:
- Patients with a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator
- Patients who have an insulin or infusion pump
- Patients who have a cochlear, otological, or ear implant
- Patients who have any implant held in place by a magnet
- Patients who have any tissue expanders
- Patients who have an implanted catheter, clamps, clips, valves, or other metal
- Patients who have any tattoos or permanent makeup above shoulders
- Patients who have any shrapnel or metal fragments
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leslie and Gordon Diamond Health Care Center
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Jankovic J, Schwartz K, Donovan DT. Botulinum toxin treatment of cranial-cervical dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, other focal dystonias and hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;53(8):633-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.8.633.
PMID: 2213039BACKGROUNDWhite LJ, Klein AM, Hapner ER, Delgaudio JM, Hanfelt JJ, Jinnah HA, Johns MM 3rd. Coprevalence of tremor with spasmodic dysphonia: a case-control study. Laryngoscope. 2011 Aug;121(8):1752-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.21872.
PMID: 21792965BACKGROUNDBielamowicz S, Stager SV, Badillo A, Godlewski A. Unilateral versus bilateral injections of botulinum toxin in patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia. J Voice. 2002 Mar;16(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00080-2.
PMID: 12002878BACKGROUNDZwirner P, Murry T, Swenson M, Woodson GE. Effects of botulinum toxin therapy in patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia: acoustic, aerodynamic, and videoendoscopic findings. Laryngoscope. 1992 Apr;102(4):400-6. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199204000-00006.
PMID: 1556889BACKGROUNDHoney CR, Kruger MT, Almeida T, Rammage LA, Tamber MS, Morrison MD, Poologaindran A, Hu A. Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Phase I Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial. Neurosurgery. 2021 Jun 15;89(1):45-52. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab095.
PMID: 33862624BACKGROUNDPatel RR, Liu L, Galatsanos N, Bless DM. Differential vibratory characteristics of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscle tension dysphonia on high-speed digital imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Jan;120(1):21-32. doi: 10.1177/000348941112000104.
PMID: 21370677BACKGROUNDPoburka BJ, Patel RR, Bless DM. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy. J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):513.e1-513.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
PMID: 28040342BACKGROUNDPatel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, Paul D, Svec JG, Hillman R. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):887-905. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009.
PMID: 29955816BACKGROUNDRoy N, Mauszycki SC, Merrill RM, Gouse M, Smith ME. Toward improved differential diagnosis of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscle tension dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2007;59(2):83-90. doi: 10.1159/000098341.
PMID: 17337898BACKGROUNDParker LA, Kunduk M, Fink DS, McWhorter A. Reliability of High-speed Videoendoscopic Ratings of Essential Voice Tremor and Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. J Voice. 2019 Jan;33(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PMID: 29246397BACKGROUNDYiu Y, Baylor CR, Bamer AM, Shelly S, Klein AM, Garrett CG, Pitman MJ. Validation of the Communicative Participation Item Bank as an Outcome Measure for Spasmodic Dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):859-864. doi: 10.1002/lary.28897. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
PMID: 32710809BACKGROUNDSimonyan K, Tovar-Moll F, Ostuni J, Hallett M, Kalasinsky VF, Lewin-Smith MR, Rushing EJ, Vortmeyer AO, Ludlow CL. Focal white matter changes in spasmodic dysphonia: a combined diffusion tensor imaging and neuropathological study. Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):447-59. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm303. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
PMID: 18083751BACKGROUNDBurgel U, Madler B, Honey CR, Thron A, Gilsbach J, Coenen VA. Fiber tracking with distinct software tools results in a clear diversity in anatomical fiber tract portrayal. Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2009 Feb;70(1):27-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1087212. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
PMID: 19191204BACKGROUNDCoenen VA, Jenkner C, Honey CR, Madler B. Electrophysiologic Validation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Aug;37(8):1470-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4753. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27032969BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher R Honey, MD
University of British Columbia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2021
First Posted
June 24, 2021
Study Start
January 30, 2023
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10