Flow Rates of High-flow Nasal Cannula and Extubation Outcome
Effect of Flow Rates of Postextubation High-flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcome: An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula with a flow rate of 60 L/min versus 40 L/min after planned extubationon on a composite outcome of reintubation and use of NIV.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2023
CompletedMay 10, 2024
August 1, 2023
1.6 years
June 14, 2021
May 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A composite outcome of NIV(non-invasive ventilation) use or reintubation in 48 hours
Proportion of patients require NIV(non-invasive ventilation) support or reintubation
48 hours after extubation
Secondary Outcomes (10)
ICU mortality
ICU stay
In-hospital mortality
Hospital stay
28-day mortality
28 days
Time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation
28 days
AUC(area under curve) of respiratory rate (0-24 hours)
24 hours
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
60 L/min arm
EXPERIMENTALThe flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60 L/min after extubation.
40 L/min arm
EXPERIMENTALThe flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40 L/min after extubation.
Interventions
The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.
The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours
- acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg) as a main cause of invasive mechanical ventilation.
- planned extubation \& already passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
You may not qualify if:
- \< 20 years of ages
- refusal to re-intubation
- with terminal cancer
- pregnant women
- with a tracheal stoma or tracheostomy tube in situ
- not feasible for high-flow nasal cannula(decided by the primary care team)
- must required to use non-invasive ventilation immediately after extubation (decided by the primary care team)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
Related Publications (16)
Ruan SY, Teng NC, Wu HD, Tsai SL, Wang CY, Wu CP, Yu CJ, Chen L. Durability of Weaning Success for Liberation from Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: An Analysis of a Nationwide Database. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 15;196(6):792-795. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2153LE. No abstract available.
PMID: 28170290RESULTSaiphoklang N, Auttajaroon J. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation in medical wards at Thammasat University Hospital. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205106. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30286153RESULTRochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Helviz Y, Goligher EC, Jaber S, Ricard JD, Rittayamai N, Roca O, Antonelli M, Maggiore SM, Demoule A, Hodgson CL, Mercat A, Wilcox ME, Granton D, Wang D, Azoulay E, Ouanes-Besbes L, Cinnella G, Rauseo M, Carvalho C, Dessap-Mekontso A, Fraser J, Frat JP, Gomersall C, Grasselli G, Hernandez G, Jog S, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Talmor D, Thille AW, Brochard L, Burns KEA. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2226-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
PMID: 33201321RESULTRochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PMID: 30888444RESULTMauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC.
PMID: 27997805RESULTMauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, Cambiaghi B, Carlesso E, Taccone P, Bottino N, Lissoni A, Spadaro S, Volta CA, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1453-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4890-1. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
PMID: 28762180RESULTMauri T, Galazzi A, Binda F, Masciopinto L, Corcione N, Carlesso E, Lazzeri M, Spinelli E, Tubiolo D, Volta CA, Adamini I, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. Crit Care. 2018 May 9;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4.
PMID: 29743098RESULTMaggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
PMID: 25003980RESULTRittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care. 2014 Apr;59(4):485-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02397. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
PMID: 24046462RESULTHernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
PMID: 26975498RESULTHernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
PMID: 27706464RESULTFernandez R, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Masclans JR, Lesmes A, Panadero L, Hernandez G. High-flow nasal cannula to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0270-9. Epub 2017 May 2.
PMID: 28466461RESULTSong HZ, Gu JX, Xiu HQ, Cui W, Zhang GS. The value of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct;72(9):562-567. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)07.
PMID: 29069260RESULTTheerawit P, Natpobsuk N, Petnak T, Sutherasan Y. The efficacy of the WhisperFlow CPAP system versus high flow nasal cannula in patients at risk for postextubation failure: A Randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
PMID: 33012589RESULTJing G, Li J, Hao D, Wang T, Sun Y, Tian H, Fu Z, Zhang Y, Wang X. Comparison of high flow nasal cannula with noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia in preventing postextubation respiratory failure: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):217-225. doi: 10.1002/nur.21942. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30887549RESULTRuan SY, Kuo YW, Huang CT, Chien YC, Huang CK, Kuo LC, Kuo JS, Chung KP, Ku SC, Chien JY; Taiwan Collaborative Intensive Care Study (TACTICS) Group. Effect of Flow Rates of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Chest. 2025 May;167(5):1388-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.021. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
PMID: 39742913DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel Fu-Chang Tsai, MD, PhD
Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2021
First Posted
June 22, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 28, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share