NCT04934163

Brief Summary

This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula with a flow rate of 60 L/min versus 40 L/min after planned extubationon on a composite outcome of reintubation and use of NIV.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 14, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 28, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

high-flow nasal cannulahypoxemic respiratory failureoxygen therapypostextubation respiratory failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • A composite outcome of NIV(non-invasive ventilation) use or reintubation in 48 hours

    Proportion of patients require NIV(non-invasive ventilation) support or reintubation

    48 hours after extubation

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • ICU mortality

    ICU stay

  • In-hospital mortality

    Hospital stay

  • 28-day mortality

    28 days

  • Time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation

    28 days

  • AUC(area under curve) of respiratory rate (0-24 hours)

    24 hours

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

60 L/min arm

EXPERIMENTAL

The flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60 L/min after extubation.

Other: Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min)

40 L/min arm

EXPERIMENTAL

The flow rate of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40 L/min after extubation.

Other: Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min)

Interventions

The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 60L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.

60 L/min arm

The flow rates of HFNC(high-flow nasal cannula) is set as 40L/min(temperature:34°C). Initial FiO2 is 100%, which would be titrated down to the minimal level to keep SpO2 ≥ 92% within 30 minutes after extubation. After that, the flow rate setting is fixed for 24hrs +/- 6 hrs; then, is tapered to 30 L/min and kept for 12 more hours. Afterwards, HFNC would be changed to conventional oxygen therapy to keep SpO2≥ 92%.

40 L/min arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours
  • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg) as a main cause of invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • planned extubation \& already passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)

You may not qualify if:

  • \< 20 years of ages
  • refusal to re-intubation
  • with terminal cancer
  • pregnant women
  • with a tracheal stoma or tracheostomy tube in situ
  • not feasible for high-flow nasal cannula(decided by the primary care team)
  • must required to use non-invasive ventilation immediately after extubation (decided by the primary care team)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, 10002, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Ruan SY, Teng NC, Wu HD, Tsai SL, Wang CY, Wu CP, Yu CJ, Chen L. Durability of Weaning Success for Liberation from Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: An Analysis of a Nationwide Database. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 15;196(6):792-795. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2153LE. No abstract available.

  • Saiphoklang N, Auttajaroon J. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation in medical wards at Thammasat University Hospital. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205106. eCollection 2018.

  • Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Helviz Y, Goligher EC, Jaber S, Ricard JD, Rittayamai N, Roca O, Antonelli M, Maggiore SM, Demoule A, Hodgson CL, Mercat A, Wilcox ME, Granton D, Wang D, Azoulay E, Ouanes-Besbes L, Cinnella G, Rauseo M, Carvalho C, Dessap-Mekontso A, Fraser J, Frat JP, Gomersall C, Grasselli G, Hernandez G, Jog S, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Talmor D, Thille AW, Brochard L, Burns KEA. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2226-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

  • Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

  • Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC.

  • Mauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, Cambiaghi B, Carlesso E, Taccone P, Bottino N, Lissoni A, Spadaro S, Volta CA, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1453-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4890-1. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

  • Mauri T, Galazzi A, Binda F, Masciopinto L, Corcione N, Carlesso E, Lazzeri M, Spinelli E, Tubiolo D, Volta CA, Adamini I, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. Crit Care. 2018 May 9;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4.

  • Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.

  • Rittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care. 2014 Apr;59(4):485-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02397. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

  • Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.

  • Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.

  • Fernandez R, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Masclans JR, Lesmes A, Panadero L, Hernandez G. High-flow nasal cannula to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0270-9. Epub 2017 May 2.

  • Song HZ, Gu JX, Xiu HQ, Cui W, Zhang GS. The value of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct;72(9):562-567. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)07.

  • Theerawit P, Natpobsuk N, Petnak T, Sutherasan Y. The efficacy of the WhisperFlow CPAP system versus high flow nasal cannula in patients at risk for postextubation failure: A Randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

  • Jing G, Li J, Hao D, Wang T, Sun Y, Tian H, Fu Z, Zhang Y, Wang X. Comparison of high flow nasal cannula with noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia in preventing postextubation respiratory failure: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):217-225. doi: 10.1002/nur.21942. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

  • Ruan SY, Kuo YW, Huang CT, Chien YC, Huang CK, Kuo LC, Kuo JS, Chung KP, Ku SC, Chien JY; Taiwan Collaborative Intensive Care Study (TACTICS) Group. Effect of Flow Rates of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Chest. 2025 May;167(5):1388-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.021. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Daniel Fu-Chang Tsai, MD, PhD

    Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2021

First Posted

June 22, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 28, 2023

Study Completion

April 30, 2023

Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations