NCT04932200

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center and observational clinical study. Investigators would like to explore the optimal emergency endoscopy timing in cirrhosis patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) by evaluating and comparing the efficacy and safety of emergency endoscopy performed at different times ( within 6 hours or between 6 and 24 hours after gastroenterologic consultation ) and its impact on the short-term prognosis.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
608

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 11, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

esophagogastric variceal bleedingemergency endoscopytiming

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • six-week mortality rate

    Patients died in six weeks after emergency endoscopy due to rebleeding or other complications associated with cirrhosis.

    6 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Immediate success hemostasis rate

    within 24 hours after traetment

  • five-day rebleeding rate

    5 days after treatment

  • detection rate of bleeding site

    during endoscopy

  • mean operating time

    during endoscopy

  • the needs of salvage treatment

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

urgent-endoscopy group

the time interval from gastroenterologic consultation to the start of emergency endoscopy \< 6 hours

early-endoscopy group

the time interval from gastroenterologic consultation to the start of emergency endoscopy between 6 and 24 hours

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with cirrhosis undergoing emergency endoscopy due to EGVB are enrolled this study.

You may qualify if:

  • age≥18 years
  • A definite diagnosis of cirrhosis (confirmed by medical history, laboratory examination and imaging examination)
  • The cause of bleeding was identified as esophageal and/or gastric vein rupture

You may not qualify if:

  • End-stage diseases of major organs (such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, and malignancies other than hepatocellular carcinoma)
  • The subject (or legal representative/guardian) refused to sign the informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, China

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017 Jan;65(1):310-335. doi: 10.1002/hep.28906. Epub 2016 Dec 1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27786365BACKGROUND
  • Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Hayes PC, Patch D, Millson C, Mehrzad H, Austin A, Ferguson JW, Olliff SP, Hudson M, Christie JM; Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology. U.K. guidelines on the management of variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. Gut. 2015 Nov;64(11):1680-704. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309262. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

    PMID: 25887380BACKGROUND
  • Reiberger T, Puspok A, Schoder M, Baumann-Durchschein F, Bucsics T, Datz C, Dolak W, Ferlitsch A, Finkenstedt A, Graziadei I, Hametner S, Karnel F, Krones E, Maieron A, Mandorfer M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Rainer F, Schwabl P, Stadlbauer V, Stauber R, Tilg H, Trauner M, Zoller H, Schofl R, Fickert P. Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III). Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;129(Suppl 3):135-158. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1262-3. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

    PMID: 29063233BACKGROUND
  • de Franchis R; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26047908BACKGROUND
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):406-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 10. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29653741BACKGROUND
  • Cheung J, Soo I, Bastiampillai R, Zhu Q, Ma M. Urgent vs. non-urgent endoscopy in stable acute variceal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1125-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.78. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

    PMID: 19337243BACKGROUND
  • Hsu YC, Chung CS, Tseng CH, Lin TL, Liou JM, Wu MS, Hu FC, Wang HP. Delayed endoscopy as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;24(7):1294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05903.x.

    PMID: 19682197BACKGROUND
  • Chen PH, Chen WC, Hou MC, Liu TT, Chang CJ, Liao WC, Su CW, Wang HM, Lin HC, Lee FY, Lee SD. Delayed endoscopy increases re-bleeding and mortality in patients with hematemesis and active esophageal variceal bleeding: a cohort study. J Hepatol. 2012 Dec;57(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

    PMID: 22885718BACKGROUND
  • Jung DH, Huh CW, Kim NJ, Kim BW. Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 4;10(1):4046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60866-x.

    PMID: 32132589BACKGROUND
  • Lau JYW, Yu Y, Tang RSY, Chan HCH, Yip HC, Chan SM, Luk SWY, Wong SH, Lau LHS, Lui RN, Chan TT, Mak JWY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Timing of Endoscopy for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1299-1308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912484.

    PMID: 32242355BACKGROUND
  • Huh CW, Kim JS, Jung DH, Yang JD, Nam SW, Kwon JH, Kim BW. Optimal endoscopy timing according to the severity of underlying liver disease in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;51(7):993-998. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

    PMID: 30803858BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver CirrhosisHypertension, Portal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Liver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mingkai Chen, PHD

    Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mingkai Chen, PHD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2021

First Posted

June 21, 2021

Study Start

June 15, 2021

Primary Completion

April 30, 2022

Study Completion

April 30, 2022

Last Updated

June 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations