Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of CPO-100 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Single Agent Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Evidence of Antitumor Activity of CPO-100 in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of CPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_1
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 28, 2024
August 1, 2024
3.9 years
June 4, 2021
August 27, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Part A-1: Number of subjects with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the DLT evaluation period. DLTs assessed per CTCAE v5.0, include grade ≥ 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia; grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rash, fatigue, infusion reaction; any other grade ≥ 2 non-hematologic toxicity judged to be dose limiting; and treatment delay \>14 days due to unresolved toxicities.
At the end of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Part A-2: Number of subjects with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) when prophylactic use of G-CSF is allowed during Cycle 1
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the DLT evaluation period. DLTs assessed per CTCAE v5.0, include grade ≥ 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia; grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rash, fatigue, infusion reaction; any other grade ≥ 2 non-hematologic toxicity judged to be dose limiting; and treatment delay \>14 days due to unresolved toxicities.
At the end of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Part B: Dose Expansion - Incidence and severity of Adverse Events
Incidence and severity of Adverse Events per CTCAE v5.0, including changes of Clinical Laboratory Values, Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Weight, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and ECG from baseline. Dosing delays and dosing intensity.
Screening to up to 4 years
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Area Under the Curve (AUC0-t) for CPO-100
0, .5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours (Day1) and Day 15
Area Under the Curve (AUC0-∞) for CPO-100
0, .5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours (Day1)
Cmax for CPO-100
0, .5, 1, 2, 3, 4 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours (Day 1) and Day 15
Tmax for CPO-100
Time Frame: 0, .5, 1, 2, 3, 4 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours (Day 1) and Day 15
Overall response rate (ORR)
At the end of every 28 day cycle for up to 4 years
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Part A-1: Dose Escalation
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks).
Part A-2: Dose escalation
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) with the option to administer G-CSF in cycle one. Starting dose will be 45 mg/m2.
Part B: Cohort 1
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) at the recommended Phase 2 dose (X mg/m2) in 15 patients with taxane naïve advanced solid tumors of gastric, head and neck, lung, and ovarian.
Part B: Cohort 2
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) at the recommended Phase 2 dose (X mg/m2) in 15 patients with taxane naïve advanced breast cancer.
Part B: Cohort 3
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) at the recommended Phase 2 dose (X mg/m2) in 15 patients with taxane naïve advanced prostate cancer.
Part B: Cohort 4
EXPERIMENTALCPO-100 administered intravenously in cycles of 3 weekly doses with 1 week rest (1 cycle = 4 weeks) at the recommended Phase 2 dose (X mg/m2) in 15 patients with either ovarian or/and breast cancer who have failed prior taxane treatment (ie, either progressed on a taxane regimen or within 6 months of receiving a taxane regimen).
Interventions
Docetaxel albumin-bound
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of a pathologically documented (histology or cytology) locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor cancer.
- Patients has failed at least 2 lines of conventional systemic therapy or have no other standard of care therapies available for their cancer. Prostate cancer patients should have received adenosine triphosphate (ADT) alone,(GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, or surgical orchiectomy and a pathway targeted agent such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc (castration-resistant prostate cancer). M1 disease must be present (not just biochemical recurrence).
- Male or female patients18 years of age or older.
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (PS) of 0, 1 or 2
- Having at least one measurable target lesion present and documented by RECIST 1.1 for each cancer other than prostate cancer. Patients with prostate cancer may be enrolled with non-measurable disease providing the patient with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase that is ≥25% and ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir, which is confirmed by a second value ≥3 weeks later, or 2 or more new bone lesions on imaging.
- Adequate major system function defined as:
- Bone marrow reserve:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x109/L Platelet count ≥ 100 x109/L Hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL without transfusion (the patient needs to be transfusion independent)
- Hepatic function:
- Total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) (unless the subject has Grade 1 bilirubin elevation due to Gilbert's disease or a similar syndrome involving slow conjugation of total bilirubin); And aspartate aminotransferase (AST) / serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) / serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) ≤ 1.5 x ULN with alkaline phosphatase ≤2.5 x ULN.
- Renal function:
- Normal serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L) OR calculated creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min. (Cockcroft - Gault formula)
- Coagulation:
- Adequate coagulation parameters defined as International Normalization Ratio (INR) ≤2.
- Adequate methods of contraception for female patients of reproductive potential during the study and for at least 6 months following last dose. Male patients with female partners of childbearing potential and women patients of childbearing potential are required to use two forms of acceptable contraception, including 1 barrier method, during their participation in the study and for at least 3 months following last dose. Male patients must also refrain from donating sperm during their participation in the study.
- +9 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Most recent chemotherapy ≤14 days or have residual NCI CTCAE greater than Grade 1 chemotherapy-related side effects, with the exception of alopecia.
- Use of any experimental drug ≤28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) prior to the first dose of CPO-100. For study drugs for which 5 half-lives is ≤28 days, a minimum of 14 days between termination of the study drug and administration of CPO-100 is required.
- Wide field radiotherapy (including therapeutic radioisotopes such as strontium 89 and lutetium 177) administered ≤28 days or limited field radiation for palliation ≤7 days prior to starting study drug or has not recovered from side effects of such therapy.
- Major surgical procedures ≤28 days of beginning study drug, or minor surgical procedures ≤7 days. No waiting required following port-a-cath placement.
- Previously untreated brain metastases. Patients who have received radiation or surgery for brain metastases are eligible if therapy was completed at least 2 weeks previously and there is no evidence of central nervous system disease progression, and no requirement for chronic corticosteroid therapy.
- Leptomeningeal metastases or spinal cord compression due to disease.
- Known serious hypersensitivity reactions to docetaxel or life-threatening toxicity due to prior exposure to docetaxel
- Pregnant or lactating.
- Acute or chronic liver, renal, or pancreatic disease that in the opinion of the investigator would put the patient at unjustified increased risk by participating in this study or could interfere with the interpretation of the study results.
- Other systemic disease that in the opinion of the investigator would put the patient at unjustified increased risk by participating in this study or could interfere with the interpretation of the study results.
- Any of the following cardiac diseases currently or within the last 6 months:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<50% as determined by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram (ECHO)
- Corrected QT (QTc) interval \>470 ms (average of 3 tracings) on screening electrocardiogram (ECG)
- Unstable angina pectoris
- Congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ Grade 2)
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 75246, United States
Yale University School of Medicine - Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169, United States
Carolina BioOncology Institute
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Lyndhurst, Ohio, 44124, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Virginia Cancer Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Related Publications (27)
Aihara T, Kim Y, Takatsuka Y. Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Feb;13(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf027.
PMID: 11886007BACKGROUNDAndre N, Carre M, Pasquier E. Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul;11(7):413-31. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.89. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
PMID: 24913374BACKGROUNDAston WJ, Hope DE, Cook AM, Boon L, Dick I, Nowak AK, Lake RA, Lesterhuis WJ. Dexamethasone differentially depletes tumour and peripheral blood lymphocytes and can impact the efficacy of chemotherapy/checkpoint blockade combination treatment. Oncoimmunology. 2019 Jul 13;8(11):e1641390. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1641390. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31646089BACKGROUNDBruno R, Olivares R, Berille J, Chaikin P, Vivier N, Hammershaimb L, Rhodes GR, Rigas JR. Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein as an independent predictor for treatment effects and a prognostic factor of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Mar;9(3):1077-82.
PMID: 12631610BACKGROUNDde Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Tombal B, Wulfing C, Kramer G, Eymard JC, Bamias A, Carles J, Iacovelli R, Melichar B, Sverrisdottir A, Theodore C, Feyerabend S, Helissey C, Ozatilgan A, Geffriaud-Ricouard C, Castellano D; CARD Investigators. Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-2518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911206. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
PMID: 31566937BACKGROUNDGradishar WJ. Taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2012;6:159-71. doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S8205. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
PMID: 23133315BACKGROUNDHardin C, Shum E, Singh AP, Perez-Soler R, Cheng H. Emerging treatment using tubulin inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 May;18(7):701-716. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1316374. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
PMID: 28388240BACKGROUNDHarvey V, Mouridsen H, Semiglazov V, Jakobsen E, Voznyi E, Robinson BA, Groult V, Murawsky M, Cold S. Phase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):4963-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0294. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
PMID: 17033039BACKGROUNDMinami H, Kawada K, Sasaki Y, Igarashi T, Saeki T, Tahara M, Itoh K, Fujii H. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of protein-unbound docetaxel in cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 2006 Mar;97(3):235-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00166.x.
PMID: 16542221BACKGROUNDOhbatake Y, Fushida S, Tsukada T, Kinoshita J, Oyama K, Hayashi H, Miyashita T, Tajima H, Takamura H, Ninomiya I, Yashiro M, Hirakawa K, Ohta T. Elevated alpha1-acid glycoprotein in gastric cancer patients inhibits the anticancer effects of paclitaxel, effects restored by co-administration of erythromycin. Clin Exp Med. 2016 Nov;16(4):585-592. doi: 10.1007/s10238-015-0387-9. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
PMID: 26359244BACKGROUNDPalmeri L, Vaglica M, Palmeri S. Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Oct;4(5):1047-59. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3397.
PMID: 19209285BACKGROUNDScher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K, Antonarakis ES, Beer TM, Carducci MA, Chi KN, Corn PG, de Bono JS, Dreicer R, George DJ, Heath EI, Hussain M, Kelly WK, Liu G, Logothetis C, Nanus D, Stein MN, Rathkopf DE, Slovin SF, Ryan CJ, Sartor O, Small EJ, Smith MR, Sternberg CN, Taplin ME, Wilding G, Nelson PS, Schwartz LH, Halabi S, Kantoff PW, Armstrong AJ; Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1402-18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
PMID: 26903579BACKGROUNDSocinski MA, Manikhas GM, Stroyakovsky DL, Makhson AN, Cheporov SV, Orlov SV, Yablonsky PK, Bhar P, Iglesias J. A dose finding study of weekly and every-3-week nab-Paclitaxel followed by carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Jun;5(6):852-61. doi: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d5e39e.
PMID: 20521351BACKGROUNDUrien S, Barre J, Morin C, Paccaly A, Montay G, Tillement JP. Docetaxel serum protein binding with high affinity to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Invest New Drugs. 1996;14(2):147-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00210785.
PMID: 8913835BACKGROUNDAmerican Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/pancreatic-cancer/about/key-statistics.html Accessed 17 May 2022
BACKGROUNDDeeken JF, Slack R, Weiss GJ, Ramanathan RK, Pishvaian MJ, Hwang J, Lewandowski K, Subramaniam D, He AR, Cotarla I, Rahman A, Marshall JL. A phase I study of liposomal-encapsulated docetaxel (LE-DT) in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):627-33. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2048-y. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
PMID: 23274395BACKGROUNDEheman C, Henley SJ, Ballard-Barbash R, Jacobs EJ, Schymura MJ, Noone AM, Pan L, Anderson RN, Fulton JE, Kohler BA, Jemal A, Ward E, Plescia M, Ries LA, Edwards BK. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2008, featuring cancers associated with excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity. Cancer. 2012 May 1;118(9):2338-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27514. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
PMID: 22460733BACKGROUNDNCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022, Management of Neutropenia
BACKGROUNDPronk LC. Modulation of docetaxel treatment [dissertation], Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 1997
BACKGROUNDSimard EP, Ward EM, Siegel R, Jemal A. Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):118-28. doi: 10.3322/caac.20141. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PMID: 22281605BACKGROUNDSmith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2758-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8983. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
PMID: 19403886BACKGROUNDStatBite. U.S. pancreatic cancer rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1822. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq517. Epub 2010 Dec 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 21139097BACKGROUNDSweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Eisenberger M, Wong YN, Hahn N, Kohli M, Cooney MM, Dreicer R, Vogelzang NJ, Picus J, Shevrin D, Hussain M, Garcia JA, DiPaola RS. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):737-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
PMID: 26244877BACKGROUNDTaxotere® US Package Insert (version 11/2021)
BACKGROUNDVon Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, Laheru DA, Smith LS, Wood TE, Korn RL, Desai N, Trieu V, Iglesias JL, Zhang H, Soon-Shiong P, Shi T, Rajeshkumar NV, Maitra A, Hidalgo M. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4548-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5742. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
PMID: 21969517BACKGROUNDVon Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
PMID: 24131140BACKGROUNDWorni M, Guller U, White RR, Castleberry AW, Pietrobon R, Cerny T, Gloor B, Koeberle D. Modest improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a trend analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry from 1988 to 2008. Pancreas. 2013 Oct;42(7):1157-63. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318291fbc5.
PMID: 23867367BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer
- Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy?
- Dexamethasone differentially depletes tumour and peripheral blood lymphocytes and can impact the efficacy of chemotherapy/checkpoint blockade combination treatment
- Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein as an independent predictor for treatment effects and a prognostic factor of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel
- Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- Taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer
- Emerging treatment using tubulin inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of protein-unbound docetaxel in cancer patients
- Elevated alpha1-acid glycoprotein in gastric cancer patients inhibits the anticancer effects of paclitaxel, effects restored by co-administration of erythromycin
- Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer
- A dose finding study of weekly and every-3-week nab-Paclitaxel followed by carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
- Docetaxel serum protein binding with high affinity to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein
- A phase I study of liposomal-encapsulated docetaxel (LE-DT) in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies
- Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2008, featuring cancers associated with excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity
- Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2008
- Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation
- U.S. pancreatic cancer rates
- Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
- Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial
- Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine
- Modest improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a trend analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry from 1988 to 2008
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Officials
Conjupro Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2021
First Posted
June 18, 2021
Study Start
March 24, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Undecided