NCT04931303

Brief Summary

Gait disturbances and movement restrictions occur frequently in Parkinson's disease. Patient-centered monitoring with objective aids in the patient's daily life, supports and promotes therapy decisions made by physicians and patients. Technical, sensor-based monitoring has the potential to generate objective target parameters at any point in time during therapy (patient journey), representing the state of health and its progression, and to make this information available to physicians and patients via telemedical data management. In this study, the gait analysis system "Mobile GaitLab Home 2.0", consisting of sensors for gait data acquisition, a smartphone application for study participants (Mobile GaitLab app) and a web portal for physicians (Mobile GaitLab portal) is used for data collection. The research question is divided into three sub-objectives: First, the study explores and tests how technically generated parameters of sensor-based gait analysis can map the symptom "bradykinesis". The second goal is the explorative investigation of how a tele-health service support with low-threshold access to medical professionals, can be integrated into the care process. The third goal is the implementation evaluation of the technological developments. Here, it is examined to determine the extent to which the implementation of gait data and patient feedback (PROMs) in the patient-centered care process within the framework of clinical decision support contributes to early gait-associated therapy optimization and thus improves the general health of patients and how initial indications of positive care effects for patients can be derived. During a 60-day observation phase, study participants use the gait analysis system, which records their gait pattern throughout the day and collects data via the Mobile GaitLab app. Study participants are asked to perform standardized gait tests in the home environment several times a day, in addition to continuous measurements during the awake phase. Frequency of data collection is controlled by Mobile GaitLab Home 2.0 and can be flexibly adjusted to the study participant's health status and therapy. The Mobile GaitLab app uses questionnaires to record data on gait safety, activity, general well-being, and events relevant to the disease. An evaluation of these data (PROMs) and the results from the gait analyses, are visualized for the study participants via the Mobile GaitLab app.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2021

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 24, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 24, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

June 1, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

ParkinsonGait AnalysisDigital HealthHome-Monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (22)

  • Difference in gait parameters (stride length) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in stride length in cm during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (stride time) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in stride time in seconds during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (gait speed) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in gait speed in m/s during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (heel-strike angle) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in heel-strike angle in degree during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (toe-off angle) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in toe-off angle in degree during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (foot-clearance) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in foot clearance in cm during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in gait parameters (variability) during 4x10 meter gait test (4x10m) performed at clinic

    Difference in variability in percent during 4x10m performed at clinic

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in time of 1 x 10 meter gait test (1x10m) performed at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in time, measured in seconds of 6 meter constant walking within the 10-meter gait test at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in time of Timed-Up-and-Go Test (TUG) performed at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in time, measured in seconds of TUG at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS III) Motor Score evaluated at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in UPDRS III Motor Score (range from 0 to 56, Lower scores mean a better outcome) at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in Shared-Decision-Making-Questionaire-9 (SDM-Q9) evaluated at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in SDM-Q9 (range from 0 to 45, Higher scores mean a better outcome) at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in Parkinsons-Disease-Questionaire (PDQ-39) evaluated at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in PDQ-39 (range from 0 to 100, Lower scores mean a better outcome) at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Difference in Parkinson-specific-health-literacy evaluated at baseline versus closeout

    Difference in Parkinson-specific-health-literacy (range from 0 to 100, Higher scores mean a better outcome) at baseline and at closeout

    day 1 and day 60

  • Number of useful Patient-Physician-Contacts evaluated at closeout

    Counted number of useful Patient-Physician-Contacts during study duration (range from 0 to individual number of Patient-Physician-Contacts) evaluated at closeout

    day 60

  • System Usability Scale (SUS) and modified SUS evaluated at closeout

    SUS score per patient - range from 0 to 100 score points (Higher scores mean a better outcome.)

    day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (stride length) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (stride length in cm)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (stride time) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (stride time in seconds)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (gait speed) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (gait speed in m/s)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (heel-strike angle) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (heel-strike angle in degree)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (toe-off angle) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (toe-off angle in degree)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (foot clearance) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (foot clearance in cm)

    day 1 to day 60

  • Collecting gait parameters (variability) during gait tests and monitoring at home

    Collection of gait parameters (variability in percent)

    day 1 to day 60

Study Arms (1)

Study Group

Enrolled patients receive a medical device which monitors gait quality and collects information about the patients health status. Possible changes of intervention (drug or physical therapy) within the observational phase (8 weeks) are initiated and prescribed by physicians as a result of routine care process or patient contact based on their (deteriorated) health status. With the chosen endpoints, changes of patients empowerment, gait quality and system usability by using a monitoring device are monitored.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study participants will be enrolled during their routine outpatient or physician visit or inpatient stay.

You may qualify if:

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (H\&Y I-IV)
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Ability to walk \> 4 x 10 m without assistance
  • Ability to speak and read
  • Ability to use an application that can be mapped on a smart device
  • Informed consent of the study participant
  • Willingness of the study participant to take therapy measures (e.g., medication therapy, exercise therapy)

You may not qualify if:

  • Tremor-dominant Parkinson's syndrome without involvement of the lower extremities
  • Aphasia and alexia
  • Visual disturbances that make reading impossible
  • Higher-grade movement disorders, with high risk of falls and non-independent ability to walk
  • Higher grade cognitive deficits
  • Inability of the study participant to understand the information and procedures of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University Hospital Erlangen

Erlangen, 91054, Germany

Location

Philipps University Marburg Medical Center

Marburg, 35043, Germany

Location

University of Regensburg

Regensburg, 93053, Germany

Location

Hospital Rummelsberg

Schwarzenbruck, 90592, Germany

Location

Neuropoint GmbH

Ulm, 89073, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson DiseaseGait Disorders, Neurologic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jürgen Winkler, Professor

    Molekulare Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2021

First Posted

June 18, 2021

Study Start

June 24, 2021

Primary Completion

February 15, 2022

Study Completion

February 15, 2022

Last Updated

August 24, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations