Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
AMAC
1 other identifier
interventional
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In the prehospital setting, the risk of difficult intubation and life-threatening complications is increased under particular conditions due to the environment or the frequent instability of patients. To limit this risk procedures and devices to ease and secure tracheal intubation must be developped and integrated. As the prevalence of complications increase with the number of attempts of intubation, one strategy is to facilitate the intubation technic itself. Direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blades is the standard device commonly used in first place for tracheal intubation. Other devices are available and used, mostly for difficult intubation, included videolaryngoscopy. This device has been used and studied for years now. Allowing a better view and glottic visualisation, videolaryngoscopy could increase the first-pass success rate. Among all videolaryngoscopes, the McGrath videolaryngoscope is the most similar device to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope. It is light, compact, with a screen directly linked to the handle, easy to use and offering excellent view. Its usability and efficacy make it a device of choice for the prehospital setting and worth further clinical trials to define its place in the airway strategy. Hypothesis: In the prehospital setting, the use of McGrath videolaryngoscope as the primary device for tracheal intubation could facilitate tracheal intubation and decrease the number of attempts of intubation and complications. The objective of our study is to determine if the use of McGrath videolaryngoscope increase the rate of successful first-pass intubation in the prehospital setting compared to direct view Macintosh laryngoscopy. The primary outcome is the rate of successful intubation at the first attempt. One attempt is defined as an advancement of the tube towards the glottis during a laryngoscopy ; every new try even during the same laryngoscopy is considered as a new attempt. Successful intubation is confirmed by the visualisation of 6 waves of EtCO2.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2021
CompletedJune 18, 2021
May 1, 2021
6 months
June 7, 2021
June 14, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of successful intubation at the first attempt
One attempt is defined as an advancement of the tube towards the glottis during a laryngoscopy ; every new try even during the same laryngoscopy is considered as a new attempt.Successful intubation is confirmed by the visualisation of 6 waves of EtCO2.
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Number of attempts needed for successful intubation
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
Time to intubate
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
Reason of failure of the first-pass success
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
Proportion of decision of switch in case of failure
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
Proportion of difficult intubations
up to 10 minutes post inclusion
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Videolaryngoscopy group
OTHERDirect laryngoscopy group
OTHERInterventions
Tracheal intubation will be performed using Videolaryngoscope in first intention and will be performed using standard pre-hospital intubation procedures : preoxygenation before intubation, maintenance of oxygenation throughout procedure, standard sedation technique (using rapid sequence intubation (RSI)), correct position confirmation using a capnogram and conditioning (hemodynamic monitoring, respirator settings, securing). If the first attempt at intubation is unsuccessful, further management will be left to the discretion of the clinician according to the procedures and algorithm of usual standard care
Tracheal intubation will be performed using Direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blades in first intention. and will be performed using standard pre-hospital intubation procedures : preoxygenation before intubation, maintenance of oxygenation throughout procedure, standard sedation technique (using rapid sequence intubation (RSI)), correct position confirmation using a capnogram and conditioning (hemodynamic monitoring, respirator settings, securing). If the first attempt at intubation is unsuccessful, further management will be left to the discretion of the clinician according to the procedures and algorithm of usual standard care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age more than 18
- Indication of orotracheal intubation
- Operators trained to the use of the McGrath
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- No insurance
- Major patient under guardianship or curatorship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2021
First Posted
June 18, 2021
Study Start
June 15, 2021
Primary Completion
December 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 15, 2021
Last Updated
June 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05