NCT04929756

Brief Summary

Approximately 217 million people worldwide currently suffer from low vision, which impacts a broad range of activities of daily living and is associated with depression and increased mortality. Over half of the patients presenting for low vision services have eye disease that affects the fovea and surrounding macula and leads to central vision loss (CVL). People with CVL are forced to use eccentric vision as a substitute for their impaired fovea, however eye movement control and visual function is impaired with eccentric vision. Recent evidence and preliminary results from the investigators show that rehabilitation methods can help improve oculomotor control and this can lead to improved functional outcomes. The investigators have developed new feedback-based training methods that aim to improve eccentric vision use by patients with CVL. In a series of studies, the investigators examine rehabilitation of fixation control, smooth pursuit eye movements that track moving objects and saccadic eye movements that abruptly change the point of regard. The investigators examine how visual feedback, scotoma awareness methods and hand-eye coordination can improve eccentric vision use. Improvements in oculomotor control are quantified with eye tracking methods and associated changes in visual function are quantified with acuity, contrast sensitivity and reading performance. The proposed research therefore develops and translates state-of-the-art methods in basic science to clinical applications. Accomplishing the proposed aims will provide new and improved methods for rehabilitation strategies for visual impairment. The ultimate goal of this proposal is to maximize the residual visual function of people with low vision and to help them to live independently, thereby improving quality of life and minimizing the economic and social burden of visual impairment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
106

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 4, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2021

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in Visual Acuity

    The smallest band-pass filtered letter that can be identified at 100% contrast

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Contrast Sensitivity

    The lowest contrast band-pass filtered letter that can be identified as a function of spatial frequency

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Fixation control

    Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area of Fixation (degrees of visual angle)

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Saccadic Eye Movement Latency

    Latency (msec) after stimulus displacement before onset of saccadic eye movement

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Saccadic Eye Movement Amplitude

    Amplitude (degrees per sec) of eye movements between fixation targets

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement Latency

    Latency (msec) after stimulus movement before onset of pursuit eye movement

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

  • Change in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement Gain

    Gain (ratio of eye movement speed divided by stimulus speed) during stimulus movement

    Before, immediately after and 2 weeks after behavioral intervention

Study Arms (5)

Fixation PRL

Visual feedback will be provided at the the preferred retinal locus (PRL) to train subjects to attend to a fixation location. Feedback consists of a gaze-contingent ring whose size varies depending on task performance. Training consists of 5 blocks of up to 50 trials, each block lasting approximately 10 minutes. Acuity and contrast sensitivity will be assessed at the PRL with forced choice psychophysical letter identification tasks. Gaze behavior will be measured with an eye tracker.

Behavioral: Visual Feedback

Smooth Pursuit PRL

Visual feedback will be provided to train subjects to attend to a PRL for smooth pursuit eye movements. Feedback consists of a gaze-contingent ring whose size varies depending on the subject's ability to center the ring on a drifting target. Training consists of 5 blocks of up to 50 trials, each block lasting approximately 10 minutes. Acuity and contrast sensitivity will be assessed at the PRL with forced choice psychophysical letter identification tasks. Smooth pursuit tracking behavior will be measured with an eye tracker.

Behavioral: Visual Feedback

Saccade PRL

Visual feedback will be provided to train subjects to attend to a PRL for saccadic eye movements. Feedback consists of a gaze-contingent ring whose size varies depending on the subject's ability to center the ring on an abruptly shifting dot. Training consists of 5 blocks of up to 50 trials, each block lasting approximately 10 minutes. Acuity and contrast sensitivity will be assessed at the PRL with forced choice psychophysical letter identification tasks. Saccadic eye movement behavior will be measured with an eye tracker.

Behavioral: Visual Feedback

Scotoma Awareness PRL

Subjects are often unaware of their scotomas because they are filled in with the surrounding background texture. The investigators will exploit this filling in to increase awareness of the scotoma by surrounding the scotoma with a visible disk that will be perceptually completed across the scotoma, rendering the scotoma visible. In a randomized within-subjects design, Acuity and contrast sensitivity will be assessed with and without a Scotoma Awareness Disk at a Fixation, Smooth Pursuit and Saccade PRL with forced choice psychophysical letter identification tasks. Oculomotor behavior will be measured with an eye tracker.

Behavioral: Visual Feedback

Meta-Guidance PRL

Oculomotor control can be promoted in the location around our hands. The investigators will exploit this meta-guidance advantage by asking subjects to move their hand and their PRL to an on-screen target. In a randomized within-subjects design, Acuity and contrast sensitivity will be assessed with and without a Hand Movement at a Fixation, Smooth Pursuit and Saccade PRL with forced choice psychophysical letter identification tasks. Oculomotor behavior will be measured with an eye tracker.

Behavioral: Visual Feedback

Interventions

Visual FeedbackBEHAVIORAL

Gaze-contingent visual feedback

Fixation PRLMeta-Guidance PRLSaccade PRLScotoma Awareness PRLSmooth Pursuit PRL

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Human subjects with bilateral central vision loss

You may qualify if:

  • over 14 year of age
  • logMAR Acuity 0.5-1.0
  • Bi-lateral foveal scotomas \< 7 °radius
  • Mini Mental State questionnaire ≥ 29
  • no history of concurrent peripheral vision loss

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

NECO Center for Eye Care

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

RECRUITING

Lighthouse Guild

New York, New York, 10023, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vision, LowMacular Degeneration

Interventions

Feedback, Sensory

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vision DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRetinal DegenerationRetinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biofeedback, PsychologyBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesFeedback, PsychologicalFeedback, PhysiologicalHomeostasisPhysiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Peter J Bex, PhD

    Northeastern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Peter J Bex, PhD

CONTACT

Nicole C Ross, O.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Posted

June 18, 2021

Study Start

September 4, 2020

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 31, 2024

Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

De-identified data will be made available after publication of study outcomes via the Open Science Foundation data repository

Locations