NCT04927143

Brief Summary

Combatting the rise of the opioid epidemic is a central challenge of U.S. health care policy. A promising approach for improving welfare and decreasing medical costs of people with substance abuse disorders is offering incentive payments for healthy behaviors. This approach, broadly known as "contingency management" in the medical literature, has repeatedly shown to be effective in treating substance abuse. However, the use of incentives by treatment facilities remains extremely low. Furthermore, it is not well understood how to design optimal incentives to treat opioid abuse. This project will conduct a randomized evaluation of two types of dynamically adjusting incentive schedules for people with opioid use disorders or cocaine use disorders: "escalating" schedules where incentive amounts increase with success to increase incentive power, and "de-escalating" schedules where incentive amounts decrease with success to improve incentive targeting. Both schemes are implemented with a novel "turnkey" mobile application, making them uniquely low-cost, low-hassle, and scalable. Effects will be measured on abstinence outcomes, including longest duration of abstinence and the percentage of negative drug tests. In combination with survey data, variation from the experiment will shed light on the barriers to abstinence more broadly and inform the understanding of optimal incentive design.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
3mo left

Started Sep 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress94%
Sep 2021Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2021

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

contingency managementapp-based treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percent of Negative Saliva Tests

    Percent of tests negative for non-medical opioids, cocaine, or stimulant

    month 3

  • Percent of App Acceptability

    Percent of eligible population which accepts app

    month 12

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Percent of Psychotherapy Visits Attended

    month 3

  • Percent of Treatment Discharge Against Medical Advice

    month 3

  • Percent of Relapse

    month 3

  • Percent of transition to step-down care

    Day 14

Study Arms (7)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will have access to the DynamiCare app; however, no behavioral incentives will be provided to this group.

Behavioral: Sham Control

Escalating Low

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have access to the DynamiCare app. Through the app, participants will receive incentive amounts for drug negative saliva tests. Incentive amounts increase with every negative drug test up to a ceiling and "reset" to the lowest amount when a test is positive or missed. The "Low" group will receive incentives worth $2-$8.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

Escalating High

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have access to the DynamiCare app. Through the app, participants will receive incentive amounts for drug negative saliva tests. Incentive amounts increase with every negative drug test up to a ceiling and "reset" to the lowest amount when a test is positive or missed. The "High" group will receive incentives worth $4-$16.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

De-Escalating Low

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have access to the DynamiCare app. Through the app, participants will receive incentive amounts for drug negative saliva tests. Incentive amounts increase with every positive drug tests (up to a ceiling), and decrease by the same increment with every negative drug test (down to a floor). The "Low" group will receive incentives worth $6-12.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

De-Escalating High

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have access to the DynamiCare app. Through the app, participants will receive incentive amounts for drug negative saliva tests. Incentive amounts increase with every positive drug tests (up to a ceiling), and decrease by the same increment with every negative drug test (down to a floor). The "High" group will receive incentives worth $10-$20.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

Constant High

EXPERIMENTAL

In the Constant groups, incentive amounts will remain unchanged across time. The "High" group will receive incentives worth $16.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

Constant Low

EXPERIMENTAL

In the Constant groups, incentive amounts will remain unchanged across time. The "Low" group will receive incentives worth $8 every test.

Behavioral: App-Based Contingency Management

Interventions

Participants will receive financial incentives for submitting randomly generated drug-negative saliva tests across the intervention period.

Constant HighConstant LowDe-Escalating HighDe-Escalating LowEscalating HighEscalating Low
Sham ControlBEHAVIORAL

Participants get access to the DynamiCare app but will not be provided with financial incentives.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age at least 18 years old;
  • Meet DSM-5 OUD, CoUD, or MUD criteria as evidenced by an OUD CPT code F11\* (opioid related disorders), a CoUD CPT code F14\* (cocaine related disorders), a MUD CPT code F15.1/F15.2 or other clinical notes indicating illicit opioid/cocaine/methamphetamine use for treatment
  • Have access to a smartphone (iOS or Android) with data plan and willing to download DynamiCare app;
  • Have an email and can access it from their smartphone;
  • Are in residential, day (PHP), partial day (IOP), or outpatient (OP) AODA treatment;
  • Are likely to be helped by contingency management because at least ONE of the following conditions is true:
  • Were first enrolled in residential, PHP, or IOP substance use treatment no longer than 2 treatment weeks (14 days/encounters of treatment) prior to providing informed consent.
  • Used non-medical opioids, cocaine, and/or methamphetamine within the last 21 days.
  • Understands English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Have evidence of active (non-substance related) psychosis that might impair participation as determined by the PI.
  • Has significant cognitive impairment that might confound participation as determined by the PI or are so significantly cognitively impaired that they have a legal guardian.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Rogers Behavioral Health

Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, 53066, United States

RECRUITING

Advocate Aurora Behavioral Health Services

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53212, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (24)

  • Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Matejkowski J, Clements NT, Seymour BL, Festinger DS. Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1426-36. doi: 10.1111/add.12589. Epub 2014 May 23.

    PMID: 24750232BACKGROUND
  • Davis DR, Kurti AN, Skelly JM, Redner R, White TJ, Higgins ST. A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014. Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

    PMID: 27514250BACKGROUND
  • Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):179-87. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111851. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

    PMID: 18198270BACKGROUND
  • Higgins ST, Washio Y, Lopez AA, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Lynch ME, Hanson JD, Higgins TM, Skelly JM, Redner R, Bernstein IM. Examining two different schedules of financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant women. Prev Med. 2014 Nov;68:51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

    PMID: 24704135BACKGROUND
  • Hutchinson ML, Chisolm MS, Tuten M, Leoutsakos JM, Jones HE. The efficacy of escalating and fixed contingency management reinforcement on illicit drug use in opioid-dependent pregnant women. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2012 Sep;11(3):150-153. doi: 10.1097/ADT.0b013e318264cf6d.

    PMID: 23226717BACKGROUND
  • Kirby KC, Carpenedo CM, Dugosh KL, Rosenwasser BJ, Benishek LA, Janik A, Keashen R, Bresani E, Silverman K. Randomized clinical trial examining duration of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for cocaine abstinence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 13.

    PMID: 23680075BACKGROUND
  • Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Morral AR, Galbicka G, Iguchi MY. Shaping smoking cessation in hard-to-treat smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):62-71. doi: 10.1037/a0018323.

    PMID: 20099951BACKGROUND
  • Ling W, Hillhouse M, Ang A, Jenkins J, Fahey J. Comparison of behavioral treatment conditions in buprenorphine maintenance. Addiction. 2013 Oct;108(10):1788-98. doi: 10.1111/add.12266. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

    PMID: 23734858BACKGROUND
  • Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x.

    PMID: 16445548BACKGROUND
  • Packer RR, Howell DN, McPherson S, Roll JM. Investigating reinforcer magnitude and reinforcer delay: a contingency management analog study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Aug;20(4):287-92. doi: 10.1037/a0027802. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

    PMID: 22686494BACKGROUND
  • Petry NM, Alessi SM, Marx J, Austin M, Tardif M. Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management treatment of substance abusers in community settings. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;73(6):1005-14. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1005.

    PMID: 16392974BACKGROUND
  • Petry NM, Alessi SM, Barry D, Carroll KM. Standard magnitude prize reinforcers can be as efficacious as larger magnitude reinforcers in cocaine-dependent methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):464-72. doi: 10.1037/a0037888. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

    PMID: 25198284BACKGROUND
  • Petry NM, Barry D, Alessi SM, Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM. A randomized trial adapting contingency management targets based on initial abstinence status of cocaine-dependent patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr;80(2):276-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026883. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

    PMID: 22229758BACKGROUND
  • Petry NM, Martin B. Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;70(2):398-405. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.2.398.

    PMID: 11952198BACKGROUND
  • Petry NM, Weinstock J, Alessi SM, Lewis MW, Dieckhaus K. Group-based randomized trial of contingencies for health and abstinence in HIV patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):89-97. doi: 10.1037/a0016778.

    PMID: 20099954BACKGROUND
  • Prendergast ML, Podus D, Chang E, Urada D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Jun 1;67(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00014-5.

    PMID: 12062779BACKGROUND
  • Rash CJ, Petry NM. Contingency management treatments are equally efficacious for both sexes in intensive outpatient settings. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;23(5):369-76. doi: 10.1037/pha0000035. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

    PMID: 26167714BACKGROUND
  • Roll JM, Higgins ST. A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 Feb 1;58(1-2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00073-3.

    PMID: 10669060BACKGROUND
  • Roll JM, Higgins ST, Badger GJ. An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):495-504; quiz 504-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-495.

    PMID: 8995832BACKGROUND
  • Roll, John M., Huber, A., Sodano, R., Chudzynski, J.E., Moynier, E., Shoptaw, S. (2006). A Comparison of Five Reinforcement Schedules for Use in Contingency Management-Based Treatment of Methamphetamine Abuse. Psychological Record, 56(1), 67.

    BACKGROUND
  • Romanowich P, Lamb RJ. Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):357-67. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-357.

    PMID: 21358898BACKGROUND
  • Romanowich P, Lamb RJ. The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):25-37. doi: 10.1002/jaba.185. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

    PMID: 25640764BACKGROUND
  • Schottenfeld RS, Chawarski MC, Pakes JR, Pantalon MV, Carroll KM, Kosten TR. Methadone versus buprenorphine with contingency management or performance feedback for cocaine and opioid dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;162(2):340-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.340.

    PMID: 15677600BACKGROUND
  • Swensen, I.D. (2015). Substance-abuse treatment and mortality. Journal of Public Economics 122, 13-30.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Opioid-Related DisordersSubstance-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Narcotic-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Mercedes Robaina, PhD

    Advocate Aurora Behavioral Health Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ariel Zucker, PhD

    University of California Santa Cruz

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mercedes Robaina, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2021

First Posted

June 15, 2021

Study Start

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations