NCT04924621

Brief Summary

To compare the difference in endotracheal intubation in participants with difficult airway between under general anesthesia by Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange and under traditional sedation by mask ventilation. The investigators focus on the different outcomes in oxygenation maintaince, carbon dioxide removal and the effectiveness of safety apnea time, to evaluate the safety of receiving endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in participants with difficult airway.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 10, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 14, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 10, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 7, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Moderate SedativeAirway ControlTHRIVE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Blood oxygen pressure

    Blood oxygen pressure after intubation immediately.

    Day 0

  • Pulse oxygen saturation

    Pulse oxygen saturation after intubation immediately.

    Day 0

  • Blood carbon dioxide pressure

    Blood carbon dioxide pressure after intubation immediately.

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Endtidal CO2

    Day 0

  • Success of intubation

    Day 0

  • Arrhythmias or dramatic haemodynamic fluctuations

    Day 0

  • Tolerance of intubation

    Day 1

  • Time to complete intubation

    Day 0

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

THRIVE group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in group T received mask ventilation(oxygen concentration: 100%, flow rate: 6L /min, head height: 30°) for 5 minutes, and then THRIVE device (device model: Respiratory Humidification Treatment Device, AIRVO 2 PT101AZ, Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Inc.) was set 100% oxygen, flow rate 30L /min, temperature 34℃.

Device: Respiratory Humidification Treatment Device, AIRVO 2 PT101AZ, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc.Drug: Midazolam(T group)Drug: Sufentani(T group)Drug: Propofol(T group)Drug: Rocuronium(T group)Drug: Drug use target(T group)

Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The Control Group will receive mask ventilation (oxygen concentration: 100%, flow rate: 6L /min, head height: 30°) for 5 minutes

Device: Mask ventilationDrug: Sufentanil(C group)Drug: Midazolam(C group)Drug: PropofolDrug: Tetracaine(C group)Drug: Drug use target

Interventions

The nasal cavity was disinfected with Iodophor cotton swab, and the appropriate nasal cavity was selected for endotracheal intubation assisted by fiberoptic bronchoscope according to the experience of anesthesiologists. After the endotracheal intubation was fixed, the anesthesia machine was connected for mechanical ventilation. The anesthesia machine was set at 50% oxygen +50% air, and the tidal volume was set at 6-8ml/kg.

THRIVE group

The Control Group will receive sequential intravenous infusion of Sufentanil 5ug, midazolam 0.05mg/kg, and propofol 1-2ug/ml, to make the BIS between 70 and 80. 2ml tetracaine was injected with cyclothyroid membrane puncture, and the nasal cavity was disinfected with iodophor cotton swab. According to the experience of anesthesiologists, the appropriate nasal cavity was selected for intranasal endotracheal intubation assisted by fiberbronchoscope. After the endotracheal intubation was successful, the anesthesia machine was connected for mechanical ventilation, full narcotic inducer will be injected. The anesthesia machine was set at 50% oxygen +50% air, and the tidal volume was set at 6-8ml/kg.

Control group

Midazolam 0.05mg/kg, intravenous injection

THRIVE group

Sufentanil 0.02-0.05ug/kg, intravenous injection

THRIVE group

Propofol 2-3ug/ml, intravenous injection

THRIVE group

Rocuronium 0.06mg/kg, intravenous injection

THRIVE group

Make BIS \< 60 .

THRIVE group

Sufentanil 5ug, intravenous injection

Control group

Midazolam 0.05mg/kg, intravenous injection

Control group

Propofol 1-2ug/ml, intravenous injection

Control group

2ml tetracaine was injected with cyclothyroid membrane puncture.

Control group

Make the BIS between 70 and 80.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-60
  • Patients with difficult airway assessed by two anesthesiologists according to the difficult airway score who needed to undergo nasal endotracheal intubation for oral and maxillofacial surgery in Peking University Stomatological Hospital.
  • BMI between 18 to 30 kg/m2
  • ASA Grade I to II
  • NYHA grade I
  • Patients requiring arterial hemodynamics monitoring and blood gas analysis due to surgical requirements
  • Signed the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Respiratory diseases: respiratory failure, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, asthma and other diseases. Patients with ventilatory dysfunction or airway obstruction.
  • NYHA cardiac function grade greater than I, or NYHA cardiac function grade I but with a history of coronary heart disease.
  • Conditions affecting the monitoring of peripheral oxygen saturation, such as poor peripheral circulation perfusion and application of vasoconstrictor, are present.
  • Indoor oxygen saturation below 92%.
  • Patients who cannot tolerate rapid exchange ventilation with nasal humidification.
  • Patients with a history of easy nasal bleeding.
  • Inability to understand or express pain scores.
  • Menstrual period and lactation period of female patients.
  • The patient has mental illness.
  • Patients with severe intraoperative complications should be removed after surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking University Hospital of Stomatology

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100081, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Propofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Central Study Contacts

Xudong Yang, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Department of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2021

First Posted

June 14, 2021

Study Start

June 10, 2021

Primary Completion

May 10, 2022

Study Completion

June 10, 2022

Last Updated

April 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations