Simplified Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using singLe Catheter and IntraCardiac Echocardiography
Simple-ICE
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) by means of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the principal method for the treatment of PAF. Usually, PVI is confirmed by recording PV potentials (PVP) from the circular catheter placed at the ostium of PV. However, newer and faster methods became avialable. The only currently available technique which can visualize LA anatomy on-line, is intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). It seems that ICE could replace all other techniques used for LA imaging. Also, there may be no need for introducing diagnostic catheters and only ablation catheter and single transseptal puncture will do. Hypothesis. Simplified ICE-based ablation is faster and with shorter fluoroscopy time than standard ablation without compromising safety and efficacy and with no significant increase in costs. Aim. To compare procedural data, costs, safety and efficacy of simplified ICE-based ablation versus standard RF ablation for AF. Methods. This is prospective, controlled trial. Three centers will be included: center 1 where simplified ICE-based procedure is performed and centers 2 and 3 where standard approach is used. Patients with PAF will be allocated to two approaches: (1) standard (n=45) arm undergoing multi-electrode RF ablation in centers 2 and 3 and (2) the simple-ICE group (n=45) undergoing RF ablation in center 1 using ablation catheter and ICE catheter only. Ablation procedure will be performed using electro-anatomical system according to the CLOSE protocol. In the simple-ICE group PVI is confirmed by lack of LA capture during pacing from or up to 5 mm inside the ablation line. In the standard group both pacing from ablation line and signals from the circular diagnostic electrode will be used to confirm PVI. A one year follow-up is planned including three visits in cardiology clinics with 4-7 day Holter ECG 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Assessed outcomes include duration of procedure, duration and dose of radiation, one-year procedural efficacy, peri- and post-procedural complications and cost-efficacy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation
Started May 2021
Typical duration for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 24, 2024
CompletedJanuary 10, 2023
January 1, 2023
2 years
May 27, 2021
January 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of procedure
calculated from first skin puncture to sheaths removal
100 - 240 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Dose of radiation
up to 4 hours
Duration of radiation
up to 20 minutes
One-year procedural efficacy
up to 366 days
Peri- and post-procedural complications
up to 28 days
Cost-efficacy
two years
Study Arms (2)
Simple-ICE group
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing ablation using only ICE visualization and ablation catheter
Standard mapping catheter without ICE
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing ablation using standard approach including diagnostic and mapping electrodes as well as ablation electrode
Interventions
Radio-frequency ablation of atrial fibrillation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- first ablation for AF
- written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- previous AF ablations
- anticipated need for more complex ablation than PVI only
- lack of written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiology, Postgraduate Medical School, Grochowski Hospital
Warsaw, 04-073, Poland
Related Publications (13)
Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M. Evaluation of a Strategy Aiming to Enclose the Pulmonary Veins With Contiguous and Optimized Radiofrequency Lesions in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
PMID: 29600792BACKGROUNDBerte B, Hilfiker G, Moccetti F, Schefer T, Weberndorfer V, Cuculi F, Toggweiler S, Ruschitzka F, Kobza R. Pulmonary vein isolation using ablation index vs. CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter. Europace. 2020 Jan 1;22(1):84-89. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz244.
PMID: 31518403BACKGROUNDEitel C, Hindricks G, Sommer P, Gaspar T, Kircher S, Wetzel U, Dagres N, Esato M, Bollmann A, Husser D, Hilbert S, Zaker-Shahrak R, Arya A, Piorkowski C. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a single-catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the pace-and-ablate approach. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
PMID: 20036199BACKGROUNDSteven D, Sultan A, Reddy V, Luker J, Altenburg M, Hoffmann B, Rostock T, Servatius H, Stevenson WG, Willems S, Michaud GF. Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2-center randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 2;62(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.059. Epub 2013 May 1.
PMID: 23644091BACKGROUNDCaponi D, Corleto A, Scaglione M, Blandino A, Biasco L, Cristoforetti Y, Cerrato N, Toso E, Morello M, Gaita F. Ablation of atrial fibrillation: does the addition of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the left atrium to electroanatomic mapping improve the clinical outcome?: a randomized comparison of Carto-Merge vs. Carto-XP three-dimensional mapping ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010 Aug;12(8):1098-104. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq107. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
PMID: 20400766BACKGROUNDDe Potter T Jr, Bardhaj G, Viggiano A, Morrice K, Geelen P. Three-dimensional Rotational Angiography as a Periprocedural Imaging Tool in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014 Nov;3(3):173-6. doi: 10.15420/aer.2014.3.3.173. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
PMID: 26835087BACKGROUNDSingh SM, Heist EK, Donaldson DM, Collins RM, Chevalier J, Mela T, Ruskin JN, Mansour MC. Image integration using intracardiac ultrasound to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Nov;5(11):1548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.08.027. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
PMID: 18984531BACKGROUNDRordorf R, Chieffo E, Savastano S, Vicentini A, Petracci B, De Regibus V, Valentini A, Klersy C, Dore R, Landolina M. Anatomical mapping for atrial fibrillation ablation: a head-to-head comparison of ultrasound-assisted reconstruction versus fast anatomical mapping. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;38(2):187-95. doi: 10.1111/pace.12539. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
PMID: 25469451BACKGROUNDKaseno K, Hisazaki K, Nakamura K, Ikeda E, Hasegawa K, Aoyama D, Shiomi Y, Ikeda H, Morishita T, Ishida K, Amaya N, Uzui H, Tada H. The impact of the CartoSound(R) image directly acquired from the left atrium for integration in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;53(3):301-308. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0368-5. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
PMID: 29656326BACKGROUNDBaran J, Stec S, Pilichowska-Paszkiet E, Zaborska B, Sikora-Frac M, Krynski T, Michalowska I, Lopatka R, Kulakowski P. Intracardiac echocardiography for detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Action-Ice I Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1074-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000504. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24243787BACKGROUNDBrooks AG, Wilson L, Chia NH, Lau DH, Alasady M, Leong DP, Laborderie J, Roberts-Thomson KC, Young GD, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Accuracy and clinical outcomes of CT image integration with Carto-Sound compared to electro-anatomical mapping for atrial fibrillation ablation: a randomized controlled study. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.130. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
PMID: 23623342BACKGROUNDKulakowski P, Sikorska A, Piotrowski R, Krynski T, Baran J. Ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-real-life results from a middle-volume electrophysiology laboratory. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;62(3):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00937-1. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
PMID: 33423186BACKGROUNDHaissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
PMID: 9725923RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2021
First Posted
June 11, 2021
Study Start
May 24, 2021
Primary Completion
May 24, 2023
Study Completion
May 24, 2024
Last Updated
January 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- from May 2024
- Access Criteria
- after personal contact access criteria will be defined
If individual data will be rquired by reviewers or other investigators (for example, for meta-analysis maiking) we will provide all details