NCT04917432

Brief Summary

Various CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) studies defined CTO as as a substantial atherosclerotic blockage with \>3 months duration of TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0 flow other than via collaterals. Following CTO-PCI, various well-established therapeutic benefits have been extensively acknowledged, such as improved angina frequency score and quality of life score from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Patients are currently referred for CTO PCI to relieve symptoms, reduce ischemia load, or pursue full revascularization to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) CTO-PCI is one of the most difficult procedures in interventional cardiology today. Although IVUS has been demonstrated to improve long-term results during CTO PCI when used for stent optimization, its impact on crossing has received little research. IVUS imaging can aid in the resolution of proximal cap ambiguity by determining the position of the main branch and determining the position of the guidewire during CTO crossing efforts both antegrade and retrograde. For the reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking and dissection (reverse CART) procedure, IVUS can help establish the best balloon size. In addition, imaging guidance can help in balloon and stent sizing, as well as stent expansion and strut apposition. The function of IVUS in CTO PCI has been a source of contention among the four major CTO schools hybrid algorithms. The importance of IVUS-guided entry in overcoming proximal cap uncertainty was underlined in the Asia Pacific algorithm. Furthermore, IVUS-guided wiring, limited subintimal tracking and re-entry are incorporated in the algorithm as alternatives, but only as last resorts. After performing dual coronary injections, the North American hybrid method evaluates four angiographic characteristics, the first of which is a clear understanding of the proximal cap placement utilising angiography or IVUS. They also explain how IVUS guidance can help with reverse CART by allowing for the proper balloon size selection. When proximal cap ambiguity is found in the Euro CTO club algorithm, antegrade procedures such as IVUS-guided puncture and scratch and go technique are performed. When using a primary retrograde approach, the probability of antegrade passing with IVUS guidance and parallel wiring, as well as the advantage of a shorter guide wire crossing time when employing an antegrade route alone, must be incorporated in the Japanese algorithm.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 27, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

May 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Technical success

    Restoration of antegrade flow with residual stenosis below 30% assessed using IVUS by measuring the minimal lumenal area in mm2

    Within three to six hours

  • procedural success

    technical success without in-hospital MACE (death, myocardial infarction, need for urgent PCI or CABG and stroke).

    within three days

  • major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    death, myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization with either PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery and stroke

    within six months

Study Arms (2)

IVUS guided CTO revascularization

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

To assess the effects of IVUS usage in CTO revascularization compared to conventional non-IVUS guided CTO-PCI as regard technical success and procedural success, MACE within 6 months.

Procedure: intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)

Non-IVUS guided CTO revascularization

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

To compare this conventional non-IVUS guided CTO-PCI arm with the other IVUS guided arm as regard technical success and procedural success, MACE within 6 months.

Procedure: Conventional CTO PCI (non-IVUS guided)

Interventions

Intravascular imaging using a specialized catheter delivered through intra-arterial approach to reach the coronaries to guide CTO-PCI procedure and optimize the results after wire crossing.

IVUS guided CTO revascularization

Non-IVUS guided CTO PCI for wiring but may be used for results optimization after wire crossing

Non-IVUS guided CTO revascularization

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- All coronary CTO patients in whom coronary anatomy is defined by coronary CT and/or Coronary angiography provided that:- CTO defined as heavy atherosclerotic occlusion with TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0 flow other than via collaterals for \>3 months and they are symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and/or positive high risk stress modality.

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months.
  • Patients with renal insufficiency (eGFR \< 60 ml/kg/m2, serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL, or on regular dialysis).
  • Patients with expected post CTO-PCI procedure SYNTAX \>10.
  • Hemodynamically unstable patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Galassi AR, Werner GS, Boukhris M, Azzalini L, Mashayekhi K, Carlino M, Avran A, Konstantinidis NV, Grancini L, Bryniarski L, Garbo R, Bozinovic N, Gershlick AH, Rathore S, Di Mario C, Louvard Y, Reifart N, Sianos G. Percutaneous recanalisation of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):198-208. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00826.

    PMID: 30636678BACKGROUND
  • Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Kim JS, Hong MK, Gwon HC, Kim HS, Yu CW, Park HS, Chae IH, Rha SW, Lee SH, Kim MH, Hur SH, Jang Y; K-CTO Registry. Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions (from the Multicenter Korean-Chronic Total Occlusion Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

    PMID: 25001153BACKGROUND
  • Park Y, Park HS, Jang GL, Lee DY, Lee H, Lee JH, Kang HJ, Yang DH, Cho Y, Chae SC, Jun JE, Park WH. Intravascular ultrasound guided recanalization of stumpless chronic total occlusion. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 14;148(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.10.052. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

    PMID: 19942305BACKGROUND
  • Dai J, Katoh O, Kyo E, Tsuji T, Watanabe S, Ohya H. Approach for chronic total occlusion with intravascular ultrasound-guided reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking technique: single center experience. J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Oct;26(5):434-43. doi: 10.1111/joic.12066.

    PMID: 24106742BACKGROUND
  • Estevez-Loureiro R, Ghione M, Kilickesmez K, Agudo P, Lindsay A, Di Mario C. The role for adjunctive image in pre-procedural assessment and peri-procedural management in chronic total occlusion recanalisation. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014 May;10(2):120-6. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140331143731.

    PMID: 24694101BACKGROUND
  • Kalogeropoulos AS, Alsanjari O, Davies JR, Keeble TR, Tang KH, Konstantinou K, Vardas P, Werner GS, Kelly PA, Karamasis GV. Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound on Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Revascularization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Dec;33:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

    PMID: 33461936BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ultrasonography, Interventional

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UltrasonographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Khaled Qayed, Ass. lecturer

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2021

First Posted

June 8, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

September 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06