Study Stopped
The study is terminated because the product (nasal provocation test) is out of stock.
Interest of Nasal Provocation Tests for Diagnosis of House Mites Allergic Rhinitis
NPT-MAR
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the positive predictive value of the combination rapid nasal provocation test (RNTP) + skin tests (TC) + specific immunoglobulins E (IgEs) to the combination of TC + IgEs (strategy currently used in clinical practice) concerning the efficacy of treatment with Allergen immunotherapy (ITA) at 1 year, in patients with symptoms suggesting allergic rhinitis to house dust mites.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 5, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.3 years
May 21, 2021
August 7, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The negative predictive value calculated with the efficacy of ITA at 1 year
The primary endpoint is negative predictive value, calculated with the efficacy of ITA at 1 year as the gold standard. It corresponds to the number of patients for whom treatment with an ITA will have been effective at 1 year, divided by the number of patients who have received an ITA. It will be calculated on the one hand for patients with TC and / or IgEs positive (control strategy), and on the other hand for patients with TC and / or IgEs positive and RNTP positive.
Year 1
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Efficacity of ITA at 2 and 3 years, according to the same methods as for the primary endpoint.
Years 2 and 3
Negative predictive value of the TC + IgEs + RNTP strategy for the efficacy of ITA at 1, 2 and 3 years, according to the same methods as for the primary endpoint.
Years 1, 2 and 3
Evaluation of the symptoms of allergic rhinitis using the CSMS score at 1, 2 and 3 years
Years 1, 2 and 3
Assessment of symptoms of allergic rhinitis using Lebel score at 1, 2 and 3 years
Years 1, 2 and 3
Evaluation of the specific quality of life at 1, 2 and 3 years, using the RQLQ questionnaire.
Years 1, 2 and 3
Study Arms (1)
Adult dust mite allergenic rhinitis patients
EXPERIMENTALNasal Provocation Test administration (725 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (5.000 SBE/ml) dosage form: Lyophilisate and solvent for nasal drops, suspension dosage and frequency: 3 nasal sprays at 3 different concentrations per year: 50, 500 and 5000 SBE / ml for 3 years Duration: 36 months
Interventions
3 different concentrations of Nasal Provocation Test are administered to patients: * Nasal spray at 50 SBE/ml for 36 months * Nasal spray at 500 SBE/ml for 36 months * Nasal spray at 5000 SBE/ml for 36 months
Negative control using only solvent is applied in order to consider a non-specific nasal hyper reactivity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years old,
- Patient with persistent mild to severe or moderate to severe intermittent rhinitis according to ARIA criteria, suspicion of allergic rhinitis to dust mites, and a positive skin test for mites and / or a positive mite specific IgE assay
- Patient having signed a free and informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients under guardianship or curatorship
- Patients under legal protection
- Patients not affiliated to a social security scheme
- Contraindications to performing a RNPT
- Active ENT or respiratory infections.
- Allergy in acute phase
- History of anaphylaxis due to the allergen involved.
- Unstabilized asthma and other obstructive pathologies.
- Severe general illnesses in evolution.
- Hypersensitivity to one of the components of the product
- Simultaneous treatment with beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors,
- Presence of an excessive degree of sensitization (e.g. history, excessive skin reactions),
- Contraindications to immunotherapy:
- Asthma (uncontrolled) or severe \[FEV \< 70% of the theorical value (after appropriate drug treatment) at the beginning of the treatment\].
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionvillelead
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, Francecollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Verduncollaborator
- CHU de Reimscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CHR Metz Thionville/Hopital de Mercy
Metz, Grand Est, 57085, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sébastien LEFEVRE, MD
CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2021
First Posted
June 7, 2021
Study Start
March 7, 2022
Primary Completion
July 5, 2024
Study Completion
July 5, 2024
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share