Effects of Enriched Gardens in Nursing Home Residents With Dementia
Effects of Enriched Gardens on Cognition and Independence of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia: a Cluster-controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparing the effect of the frequentation of an enriched garden vs sensory conventional garden by nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease. The effects will be evaluated as regards to cognitive impairment (MMSE), autonomy (ADL) and prevention of falls (Unipodal stance and UpandGo Test)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2021
CompletedMay 26, 2021
May 1, 2021
7 months
March 3, 2021
May 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in global cognitive function
Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) , 0-30, higher score is the better outcome
6 MONTHS
Change in functional independence
Activities of daily living (ADL), 0-6, higher score is the better outcome
6 MONTHS
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in gait ability
6 MONTHS
Change in balance
6 MONTHS
Study Arms (3)
GROUP ONE
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants do not receive incentive to visit any gardens
GROUP TWO
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe participants receive incentives by carers to visit regularly a conventional sensory garden
GROUP THREE
EXPERIMENTALThe participants receive incentives by carers to visit regularly an enriched garden
Interventions
Carers invites every the participants of group 2 and 3 visiting their respective gardens (enriched or conventional sensory garden)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Give consent
- Ability walking alone
- Alzheimer's disease
You may not qualify if:
- No dementia
- Severe dementia
- Severe behavioural disorder
- Inability to walk alone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RIVAGESlead
Study Sites (1)
Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix et Sorbonne Université
Ivry-sur-Seine, Val De Marne, 94200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigators and outcomes assessor do not know which groups the participants belongs to
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2021
First Posted
May 26, 2021
Study Start
March 15, 2020
Primary Completion
October 15, 2020
Study Completion
October 15, 2020
Last Updated
May 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will only be available to study reviewers